<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7226.0">
<TITLE>RE: [cl-wiki-devel] darcs repository</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>----Original Message-----<BR>
From: cl-wiki-devel-bounces@common-lisp.net on behalf of Stefan Scholl<BR>
Sent: Wed 9/7/2005 8:35 PM<BR>
To: cl-wiki-devel@common-lisp.net<BR>
Subject: [cl-wiki-devel] darcs repository<BR>
<BR>
>You can get darcs at <A HREF="http://www.darcs.net/">http://www.darcs.net/</A><BR>
><BR>
>Getting the CL-WIKI development(!) darcs repository:<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> darcs get <A HREF="http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-wiki/repos/cl-wiki_dev">http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-wiki/repos/cl-wiki_dev</A><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
>If you want to update just enter the directory of your local<BR>
>darcs repository and<BR>
><BR>
> darcs pull<BR>
><BR>
>Please remember: This repository can contain broken code!<BR>
<BR>
Being an occasional CVS user (and someone who didn't use darcs at all)<BR>
for simple version cont. stuff I just wonder the reasons why darcs<BR>
is getting popular especially among Lispers. Is simply that "darcs is<BR>
better CVS" or some specific feature for management? Ease of use?<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>