From yanxiaoguang at gmail.com  Wed Aug  1 00:56:40 2012
From: yanxiaoguang at gmail.com (Kenneth Yan)
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:56:40 +0800
Subject: [cl-who-devel] The problem with "esc"
In-Reply-To: <873948znv6.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CAC7gWsuEGGPM2Z2-yR_03UGuEa4e6eEGxj_ifBfU-zRCAwni_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<873948znv6.fsf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAC7gWssnmK0=ZFgfko11CUZSDLdO2ztGNUb=YhzYeHsDRVf82A@mail.gmail.com>

Of course, escape-string always works. But this is not my point. Since
"esc" is the shortcut of "escape-string", hope "esc" will be better.

Best,
Kenneth


On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Stas Boukarev <stassats at gmail.com> wrote:

> Kenneth Yan <yanxiaoguang at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Please pay attention to the issue below.
> >
> > (with-html-output-to-string (*standard-output* nil :prologue nil)
> >   (:input :type "text" :name (escape-string "??") :readonly "readonly"
> >           :value (esc "??")))
> >
> > "<input type=\"text\" name=\"&#20320;&#22909;\"
> > readonly=\"readonly\"&#20320;&#22909; value=\"&#20320;&#22909;\">"
> Try escape-string instead.
>
> --
> With best regards, Stas.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cl-who-devel site list
> cl-who-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-who-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-who-devel/attachments/20120801/bf8bd2a7/attachment.html>

From stassats at gmail.com  Wed Aug  1 03:16:34 2012
From: stassats at gmail.com (Stas Boukarev)
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 07:16:34 +0400
Subject: [cl-who-devel] The problem with "esc"
In-Reply-To: <CAC7gWssnmK0=ZFgfko11CUZSDLdO2ztGNUb=YhzYeHsDRVf82A@mail.gmail.com>
	(Kenneth Yan's message of "Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:56:40 +0800")
References: <CAC7gWsuEGGPM2Z2-yR_03UGuEa4e6eEGxj_ifBfU-zRCAwni_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<873948znv6.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAC7gWssnmK0=ZFgfko11CUZSDLdO2ztGNUb=YhzYeHsDRVf82A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87r4rr714d.fsf@gmail.com>

Kenneth Yan <yanxiaoguang at gmail.com> writes:

> Of course, escape-string always works. But this is not my point. Since
> "esc" is the shortcut of "escape-string", hope "esc" will be better.
esc is a shortcut for (princ (escape-string ...))

-- 
With best regards, Stas.