[cl-who-devel] [hunchentoot-devel] edicl & Quicklisp - formal release tarballs or production-ready master branches?
Edi Weitz
edi at weitz.de
Fri Sep 23 09:40:47 UTC 2011
Sebastian, thanks for taking the time to go through this. Details below.
I /think/ the main thing I wanted was an easier way for users of
CL-WHO to extend it (without having to deal with undocumented and/or
unexported internal stuff). Judging from your description of the
changes, it seems that I stopped somewhere in the middle. Maybe I
even have uncommitted changes somewhere at home. (But then they must
be on an older laptop that I currently don't have access to.)
Some comments inline:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Sebastian Tennant
<sebyte at smolny.plus.com> wrote:
> 1. TREE-TO-COMMANDS lacks a documentation string. Not part of the API.
Did it have a documentation string once? (I guess so.) If it had,
then I probably removed it because its behaviour changed. I probably
(?) also wanted to export it...
> 3. If WITH-REBINDING is not going to be used, should it not be removed, or a
> note added explaining why it may be used in the future. Not part of the
> API.
Should certainly be removed. I'm sure I just copied it from some of
my other libs.
Thanks again,
Edi.
More information about the Cl-who-devel
mailing list