From edi at agharta.de  Tue Oct 12 21:44:35 2010
From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 23:44:35 +0200
Subject: [cl-who-devel] Adding support for HTML5 doctype
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinhwp-M=qCYqyf1cGuhJf=qv_4pKUu61ceBsH0A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C8F9883.5070908@chaitanyagupta.com>
	<AANLkTiniUpB9faTP-67tuuYVJ6rbeBThho6A2mchgFZs@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C8FA696.4020204@chaitanyagupta.com>
	<AANLkTinokNtD-4ifqkyD7ExaA0VbRmNSVJp49vyPPErm@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C90937A.3090908@chaitanyagupta.com>
	<4CA1BD75.2030300@chaitanyagupta.com>
	<AANLkTinhwp-M=qCYqyf1cGuhJf=qv_4pKUu61ceBsH0A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikmLms1E4p36CVgkAfdQS1qxoNu28m7rbm4vJrZ@mail.gmail.com>

I've finally committed your patch to the SVN repository.  Sorry for
the long delay and thanks again.

Edi.



From mail at chaitanyagupta.com  Wed Oct 13 05:59:59 2010
From: mail at chaitanyagupta.com (Chaitanya Gupta)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:29:59 +0530
Subject: [cl-who-devel] Adding support for HTML5 doctype
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikmLms1E4p36CVgkAfdQS1qxoNu28m7rbm4vJrZ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C8F9883.5070908@chaitanyagupta.com>
	<AANLkTiniUpB9faTP-67tuuYVJ6rbeBThho6A2mchgFZs@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C8FA696.4020204@chaitanyagupta.com>
	<AANLkTinokNtD-4ifqkyD7ExaA0VbRmNSVJp49vyPPErm@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C90937A.3090908@chaitanyagupta.com>
	<4CA1BD75.2030300@chaitanyagupta.com>
	<AANLkTinhwp-M=qCYqyf1cGuhJf=qv_4pKUu61ceBsH0A@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikmLms1E4p36CVgkAfdQS1qxoNu28m7rbm4vJrZ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4CB54ADF.9000006@chaitanyagupta.com>

That's great! No problems.

Chaitanya

Edi Weitz wrote:
> I've finally committed your patch to the SVN repository.  Sorry for
> the long delay and thanks again.
> 
> Edi.
> 


-- 
http://chaitanyagupta.com/blog/



From lispercat at gmail.com  Mon Oct 25 17:01:15 2010
From: lispercat at gmail.com (Andrei Stebakov)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:01:15 -0400
Subject: [cl-who-devel] Expected behavior?
Message-ID: <AANLkTinKasdPsSWoq3sakgffRSYt9VhYdKObKmGz=E9H@mail.gmail.com>

I wonder if following two statements should produce the same result:

(with-html-output-to-string (*standard-output* nil :indent t)
  (:p "text"))

and
(with-html-output-to-string (*standard-output* nil :indent t)
  (:p (str (concatenate 'string "te" "xt"))))

So far the first statement gives:
"
<p>
  text
</p>"

The second:
"
<p>text
</p>"

What happens to the indentation in the second case?
I am using cl-who 0.11.1 with sblc 1.0.37 on Linux

Thank you,
Andrei



From pjb at informatimago.com  Tue Oct 26 03:36:22 2010
From: pjb at informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 05:36:22 +0200
Subject: [cl-who-devel] Expected behavior?
References: <AANLkTinKasdPsSWoq3sakgffRSYt9VhYdKObKmGz=E9H@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8762wpeibt.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>

Andrei Stebakov <lispercat at gmail.com> writes:

> I wonder if following two statements should produce the same result:
>
> (with-html-output-to-string (*standard-output* nil :indent t)
>   (:p "text"))
>
> and
> (with-html-output-to-string (*standard-output* nil :indent t)
>   (:p (str (concatenate 'string "te" "xt"))))
>
> So far the first statement gives:
> "
> <p>
>   text
> </p>"
>
> The second:
> "
> <p>text
> </p>"
>
> What happens to the indentation in the second case?
> I am using cl-who 0.11.1 with sblc 1.0.37 on Linux

They're the same result.  Since it's HTML, sameness should be defined as
what will be rendered by an HTML engine, and the HTML standards specify
that those two sources produce exactly the same rendering.


-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/