From edi at agharta.de  Thu Apr  5 07:01:35 2007
From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:01:35 +0200
Subject: [cl-who-announce] New release 0.7.1 (Was: should
 cl-who::*html-mode* be a compile time flag?)
In-Reply-To: <4877ae640703301136y249ce5e7s4a332c4c86888502@mail.gmail.com> (Mac
	Chan's message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:36:30 -0700")
References: <4877ae640703291114w3e283d8ald44d8b2d17056565@mail.gmail.com>
	<ur6r7mamy.fsf@agharta.de>
	<4877ae640703301136y249ce5e7s4a332c4c86888502@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <uy7l7uwxc.fsf_-_@agharta.de>

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:36:30 -0700, "Mac Chan" <emailmac at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sure, attached is a patch for this and also remove extra newlines if
> no prologue is specified.

Thanks.  I've released a new version which incorporates your patches.


From edi at agharta.de  Fri Apr 27 09:42:46 2007
From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:42:46 +0200
Subject: [cl-who-announce] New release 0.8.0   (Was: html empty tags)
In-Reply-To: <4877ae640704262219g3a979ad2o565a7c21361d99ca@mail.gmail.com> (Mac
	Chan's message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:19:36 -0700")
References: <4877ae640704262219g3a979ad2o565a7c21361d99ca@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <u7iryqhk9.fsf@agharta.de>

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:19:36 -0700, "Mac Chan" <emailmac at gmail.com> wrote:

> As you probably know, there are certain html tags that will break
> the browser's rendering if they are not paired up properly with a
> close tag </tag> even if it's content is empty.
>
> For example, <textarea> and <script> (ie)
>
> Well today I'm bitten by this, where <div id='header' /> messes up
> firefox's rendering coupled with some css rules.
>
> Even though I'm awared of how to get around it, sometimes it's
> rather hard to spot that with a sea of nested (:div (:div ...)).
>
> This is also a recurring problem for newbie and there were a few
> threads regarding this.
>
> Attach is a patch to fix this.

Thanks, that's quite useful.  I've incorporated it into the new
release.

However, I think the actual test you had in who.lisp is not quite what
you meant.  Please check if my modification is OK.  You also forgot to
export the new symbols... :)

> I'm not sure if anyone is using cl-who to generate XML.

I'm pretty sure some people do.  I also did it a couple of times.

Thanks,
Edi.


From edi at agharta.de  Fri Apr 27 19:12:01 2007
From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:12:01 +0200
Subject: [cl-who-announce] New release 0.8.1 (Was: [cl-who-devel] New
	release 0.8.0)
In-Reply-To: <4877ae640704271156v1317b97bgee1a620f38d63ef8@mail.gmail.com> (Mac
	Chan's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:56:33 -0700")
References: <4877ae640704262219g3a979ad2o565a7c21361d99ca@mail.gmail.com>
	<u7iryqhk9.fsf@agharta.de>
	<4877ae640704271156v1317b97bgee1a620f38d63ef8@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <uslalocn2.fsf_-_@agharta.de>

On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:56:33 -0700, "Mac Chan" <emailmac at gmail.com> wrote:

> BTW, I immediately found a bug! ........ in the doc ;-)

Argh - I had complete forgotten about all this old cruft.  I've
cleaned it up now.

Thanks,
Edi.