[cl-semantic-devel] Choice of Lisp
Alan Ruttenberg
alanruttenberg at gmail.com
Wed Feb 8 07:02:44 UTC 2006
Why would you choose a particular lisp as opposed to aiming for
platform neutrality? (I use openmcl, abcl, sbcl, cmucl) There are a
variety of compatibility packages.
It would seem to me that this is a more sensible course. Also you might
want to consider McClim, lambda GTK, calling out to java libraries, or
AJAX technology for the UI all of which are a little more current than
ltk. Unless you are thinking about some extremely cpu intensive user
interface, I'd think it would make sense to go with a browser based
solution.
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 7, 2006, at 11:11 AM, brandon.werner at mac.com wrote:
> All:
>
> There has been some debate among the researchers about which CL to use
> for this project. Although I have experience with both SBCL and
> Allegro, it would appear that Allegro is not going to release their
> 8.0 evaluation version anytime soon and this is the only version that
> includes the asdf: functionality we will be using to maintain and
> install builds of cl-semantic.
>
> Yes asdf can be easily added to Allegro, but SBCL is very easy to
> setup, and in a project where are are attempting to get as
> many developers interested as possible, many whom may not have
> university access to Allegro, it seems important that we have a CL
> that is ready right out of the box (we may even group all the source
> for Wilber and other necessary requires in to one .gz for easy
> deployment in to each developer's repository).
>
> However, from my experience using SLIME with Allegro and SBCL, SBCL is
> extremely slow and is generally buggy on OSX do to Apple's Crash
> Reporter actively looking for Mach exceptions because Mac OSX has no
> idea that a program can do a SIGSEGV and keep on living.
>
> Anyone have any suggestions?
>
> I would also like suggestions on a GUI environment for cl-semantic,
> perhaps ltk (uses Tk).
>
> Also, please start posting directly to the message group instead of to
> individual email addresses so that we can leverage our new home at
> common-lisp.net. We have had many people joint the development and
> announce list and we owe it to them to let everyone know what is going
> on, even if they have yet to join the project.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Brandon Werner
> cl-semantic project administrator
> http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-semantic/
> brandon.werner at mac.com
>
> cl-semanic is a collection of RDF/OWL extraction and relationship
> parsing macros written in Common Lisp.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cl-semantic-devel mailing list
> cl-semantic-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-semantic-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 2721 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-semantic-devel/attachments/20060208/bede4042/attachment.bin>
More information about the Cl-semantic-devel
mailing list