<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"><html>
<head>
<meta name="Generator" content="Zarafa WebAccess v6.20.4-14107">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<title>Convenience over extensibility? Or: How to build on top of hu.dwim.rdbms?</title>
<style type="text/css">
body
{
font-family: Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif;
font-size: 12px;
padding: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
margin: 0px;
border-style: none;
background-color: #ffffff;
}
p, ul, li
{
margin-top: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<p>After all, you derived the long names from the "mechanics" of the code.<br />And now you expect an outsider to go the opposite direction, deriving the "mechanics" of the code from the long names?<br />I don't think this is going to work for an outsider. Long names may even confuse him because he has to<br />"see through" them in order to be able to understand the "mechanics".<br /><br />Maybe you don't expect an outsider to understand the "mechanics" of the code by reading your long names and<br />merely want to aid that process of understanding. How well that is accomplished through the use of long names, is, of course,<br />still open for question. :)<br /><br />Regards,<br />chris<br /> </p>
!DSPAM:4cd7f39b48584559617140!
</body>
</html>