From marten at sdf.lonestar.org  Fri Apr 25 18:19:47 2008
From: marten at sdf.lonestar.org (Marten King)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:19:47 +0000
Subject: [cl-rdbms-devel] asdf-install
Message-ID: <200804251819.m3PIJlQ1028481@sdf.lonestar.org>

Hi,

Is making cl-rdbms and cl-perec asdf-installable desired here? I've run into
enough install problems as to be discouraged.

Are there any objections to me trying to get these packages asdf-installable
from http://www.cliki.net/ASDF-Install and posting here when problems arise?

TIA


From marten at sdf.lonestar.org  Fri Apr 25 20:38:52 2008
From: marten at sdf.lonestar.org (Marten King)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:38:52 +0000
Subject: [cl-rdbms-devel] basic loading problem 
Message-ID: <200804252038.m3PKcqma024695@sdf.lonestar.org>

Hi,

Am experiencing the following error on asdf:load-op ..

The function CL-RDBMS::REGISTER-READTABLE-FOR-SWANK is undefined.
   [Condition of type UNDEFINED-FUNCTION]

Restarts:
0: [RETRY] Retry performing #<ASDF:LOAD-OP NIL {4EA125D9}> on #<CL-RDBMS-SYSTEM::LOCAL-CL-SOURCE-FILE "configuration" {4E827961}>.
1: [ACCEPT] Continue, treating #<ASDF:LOAD-OP NIL {4EA125D9}> on #<CL-RDBMS-SYSTEM::LOCAL-CL-SOURCE-FILE "configuration" {4E827961}> as having been successful.
2: [ABORT-REQUEST] Abort handling SLIME request.
3: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level.

Backtrace:
0: (SB-KERNEL:%COERCE-CALLABLE-TO-FUN CL-RDBMS::REGISTER-READTABLE-FOR-SWANK)
1: (SB-FASL::FOP-FUNCALL-FOR-EFFECT)
2: (SB-FASL::LOAD-FASL-GROUP #<SB-SYS:FD-STREAM for "file /home/mk/Project/src/cl-rdbms/configuration.fasl" {4E874AA1}>)
3: ((FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK))
4: (SB-FASL::LOAD-AS-FASL #<SB-SYS:FD-STREAM for "file /home/mk/Project/src/cl-rdbms/configuration.fasl" {4E874AA1}> NIL #<unavailable argument>)
5: (SB-FASL::%LOAD #<SB-SYS:FD-STREAM for "file /home/mk/Project/src/cl-rdbms/configuration.fasl" {4E874AA1}>)
6: (SB-FASL::%LOAD #P"/home/mk/Project/src/cl-rdbms/configuration.fasl")
7: (LOAD #P"/home/mk/Project/src/cl-rdbms/configuration.fasl") 


From attila.lendvai at gmail.com  Sat Apr 26 13:16:32 2008
From: attila.lendvai at gmail.com (Attila Lendvai)
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:16:32 +0200
Subject: [cl-rdbms-devel] basic loading problem
In-Reply-To: <200804252038.m3PKcqma024695@sdf.lonestar.org>
References: <200804252038.m3PKcqma024695@sdf.lonestar.org>
Message-ID: <b54b34af0804260616n39fdd31ax3e0c5f29f18ecd01@mail.gmail.com>

>  Am experiencing the following error on asdf:load-op ..
>
>  The function CL-RDBMS::REGISTER-READTABLE-FOR-SWANK is undefined.
>    [Condition of type UNDEFINED-FUNCTION]

darcs pull in cl-syntax-sugar?

-- 
 attila


From attila.lendvai at gmail.com  Sat Apr 26 13:21:35 2008
From: attila.lendvai at gmail.com (Attila Lendvai)
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:21:35 +0200
Subject: [cl-rdbms-devel] asdf-install
In-Reply-To: <200804251819.m3PIJlQ1028481@sdf.lonestar.org>
References: <200804251819.m3PIJlQ1028481@sdf.lonestar.org>
Message-ID: <b54b34af0804260621k325c00c9o1543b30325be4e8d@mail.gmail.com>

>  Is making cl-rdbms and cl-perec asdf-installable desired here? I've run into

we don't care much about asdf-install. but it's not a negative don't
care but  a neutral don't care, so feel free to explore the
possibilities...

we run all our dependencies from VCS repos and i think doing anything
else just generates extra headache currently in lisp. the library
infrastructure is lacking proper tools, but i stop the criticism right
here until i do my own share in change the situation... :)

-- 
 attila


From attila.lendvai at gmail.com  Sun Apr 27 09:20:10 2008
From: attila.lendvai at gmail.com (Attila Lendvai)
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:20:10 +0200
Subject: [cl-rdbms-devel] basic loading problem
In-Reply-To: <200804252038.m3PKcqma024695@sdf.lonestar.org>
References: <200804252038.m3PKcqma024695@sdf.lonestar.org>
Message-ID: <b54b34af0804270220x58e85355hbbef730a5405b25c@mail.gmail.com>

>  Am experiencing the following error on asdf:load-op ..
>
>  The function CL-RDBMS::REGISTER-READTABLE-FOR-SWANK is undefined.
>    [Condition of type UNDEFINED-FUNCTION]

for the record, the problem was with cl-def being loaded without swank
while it was compiled with swank loaded (or something like that :)

the fix was to set up proper asdf-system-connections for cl-def and
swank and now it depends on cl-syntax-sugar, too.

so darcs pull in cl-def should fix loading with or without swank.

-- 
 attila