From juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com Wed Jan 12 15:16:02 2011 From: juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com (Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:16:02 +0100 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] Problem with pathnames Message-ID: [I CC just in case the ECL mailing list provides me a better answer] In polishing the upcoming ECL release I discovered that there are two problems when trying to compile cl-unicode. One is due to a bug in ECL, the other one is due to what I believe an error in CL-UNICODE. More precisely, in build/dump.lisp I find (with-output-to-source-file (out (make-pathname :name "derived-properties" :type :unspecific :directory '(:relative :up "test")) :no-header-p t) As far as I know, :UNSPECIFIC is reserved for values that do not make sense for a filesystem, but in this particular case what happens is that the file does not have a file extension, not that extensions (types) do not exist at all. The consequence is that this lisp form creates an unprintable pathname (one which cannot be written "readably"), both in ECL and CLISP, and ECL righteously complains that this file can not be opened. I believe the appropriate line should be ":type nil", which works on SBCL, CLISP and ECL, AFAIK. Am I wrong? Juanjo P.S.: This is cl-unicode 0.1.1 distributed by quicklisp. -- Instituto de F?sica Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From edi at weitz.de Wed Jan 12 15:39:56 2011 From: edi at weitz.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:39:56 +0100 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] Problem with pathnames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I made the change you proposed (see BKNR repository) but then immediately reverted it again. The problem is that the pathname is only created so that it will be merged afterwards (see with-output-to-source-file). If you use NIL for the type slot, you leave it "open" for MERGE-PATHNAMES to fill which is not what I want. After reading the spec I agree with you, though, that :UNSPECIFIC doesn't look right. Do you have a better idea how to solve this? Thanks, Edi. On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > [I CC just in case the ECL mailing list provides me a better answer] > > In polishing the upcoming ECL release I discovered that there are two > problems when trying to compile cl-unicode. One is due to a bug in ECL, the > other one is due to what I believe an error in CL-UNICODE. More precisely, > in build/dump.lisp I find > > ? (with-output-to-source-file (out (make-pathname :name "derived-properties" > ????????????????????????????????????????????????? :type :unspecific > ????????????????????????????????????????????????? :directory '(:relative :up > "test")) > ?????????????????????????????????? :no-header-p t) > > As far as I know, :UNSPECIFIC is reserved for values that do not make sense > for a filesystem, but in this particular case what happens is that the file > does not have a file extension, not that extensions (types) do not exist at > all. > > The consequence is that this lisp form creates an unprintable pathname (one > which cannot be written "readably"), both in ECL and CLISP, and ECL > righteously complains that this file can not be opened. > > I believe the appropriate line should be ":type nil", which works on SBCL, > CLISP and ECL, AFAIK. > > Am I wrong? > > Juanjo > > P.S.: This is cl-unicode 0.1.1 distributed by quicklisp. > > -- > Instituto de F?sica Fundamental, CSIC > c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) > http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com > > _______________________________________________ > cl-ppcre-devel site list > cl-ppcre-devel at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-devel > From juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com Wed Jan 12 21:28:17 2011 From: juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com (Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:28:17 +0100 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] Problem with pathnames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I will look at the code and see how it is used. I thought it was directly passed to open but now I see that the with-... macro is not a standard one. What about merging in a way that does not pass the extensions? What about (merge-pathnames ,relative-path (make-pathname :name nil :type nil *this-file*)) instead of (merge-pathnames ,relative-path *this-file*) Juanjo -- Instituto de F?sica Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com Wed Jan 12 21:39:14 2011 From: juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com (Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:39:14 +0100 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] Problem with pathnames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This patch seems to fix everything and let cl-unicode build with ECL --- dump-orig.lisp 2011-01-12 22:37:54.000000000 +0100 +++ dump.lisp 2011-01-12 22:32:17.000000000 +0100 @@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ writes to the file denoted by RELATIVE-PATH - a path relative to the location of this source file. Writes a Lisp header to the files unless NO-HEADER-P is true." - `(let ((pathname (merge-pathnames ,relative-path *this-file*))) + `(let ((pathname (merge-pathnames ,relative-path + (make-pathname :name nil :type nil *this-file*)))) (format t "~&;;; Writing source file ~A" (file-namestring pathname)) (force-output) (with-open-file (,stream pathname -- Instituto de F?sica Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From edi at weitz.de Wed Jan 12 22:41:54 2011 From: edi at weitz.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:41:54 +0100 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] Problem with pathnames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm surprised that it works for your because there's a keyword missing in the call to make-pathname. But the general idea is of course correct and I've committed this to the BKNR repository now. Thanks, Edi. On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > This patch seems to fix everything and let cl-unicode build with ECL > --- dump-orig.lisp 2011-01-12 22:37:54.000000000 +0100 > +++ dump.lisp 2011-01-12 22:32:17.000000000 +0100 > @@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ > ?writes to the file denoted by RELATIVE-PATH - a path relative to the > ?location of this source file. ?Writes a Lisp header to the files > ?unless NO-HEADER-P is true." > - ?`(let ((pathname (merge-pathnames ,relative-path *this-file*))) > + ?`(let ((pathname (merge-pathnames ,relative-path > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(make-pathname :name nil :type nil > *this-file*)))) > ?? ? ?(format t "~&;;; Writing source file ~A" (file-namestring pathname)) > ?? ? ?(force-output) > ?? ? ?(with-open-file (,stream pathname > > -- > Instituto de F?sica Fundamental, CSIC > c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) > http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com > > _______________________________________________ > cl-ppcre-devel site list > cl-ppcre-devel at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-devel > From juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com Wed Jan 12 23:02:30 2011 From: juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com (Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:02:30 +0100 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] Problem with pathnames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Edi Weitz wrote: > I'm surprised that it works for your because there's a keyword missing > in the call to make-pathname. But the general idea is of course > correct and I've committed this to the BKNR repository now. > Probably because I had to rewrite the patch by hand after messing it up with emacs :-) Thanks for accepting the fix Juanjo -- Instituto de F?sica Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp Mon Jan 17 11:26:18 2011 From: sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp (Hiroshi Sakate) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:26:18 +0900 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE Message-ID: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> To: cl-ppcre-devel members Hi I'm Hiroshi. I want to use CL-EMB on sbcl. But in the installation, I get error for CL-UNICODE. I have been installed correctly last year. May be beginning of December is OK. In these days, this problem occured. [environment] * Ubuntu Linux 10.04 lucid * SBCL 1.0.29.11.debian [procedure] $rm -rf .sbcl $sbcl (require :asdf) (require :asdf-install) (asdf-install:install :cl-unicode) choose "Personal installation" choose [SKIP-GPG-CHECK] for cl-unicode choose [SKIP-GPG-CHECK] again for cl-ppcre Then this message appears. ================================================================= debugger invoked on a SB-INT:SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR in thread #: failed to find the WRITE-DATE of /home/test/.sbcl/site/cl-unicode-0.1.1/lists.lisp: No such file or directory Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name): 0: [RETRY] Retry installation 1: Retry installation 2: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level. (SB-IMPL::SIMPLE-FILE-PERROR "failed to find the WRITE-DATE of ~A" #P"/home/test/.sbcl/site/cl-unicode-0.1.1/lists.lisp" 2) ================================================================= And I have made a backup of .sbcl last year. So I copied "lists.lisp" to /home/test/.sbcl/site/cl-unicode-0.1.1/ Do above process (except for rm) again. Then installation have finished correctly. How can I install CL-UNICODE without copy lists.lisp? Or why this problem occurs. I don't know that asking here is correct or not. But I don't know well about lisp communities. Sincerely, Hiroshi From edi at weitz.de Mon Jan 17 12:25:09 2011 From: edi at weitz.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:25:09 +0100 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE In-Reply-To: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> References: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: Hi, It's fine to ask here. The file lists.lisp should be generated automatically the first time you load CL-UNICODE. As that didn't seem to happen in your case, I can only guess that there's some incompatibility in your setup. What for example is the version of ASDF you are using? Maybe someone else on this list has an idea? Cheers, Edi. On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Hiroshi Sakate wrote: > To: cl-ppcre-devel members > > Hi I'm Hiroshi. > > I want to use CL-EMB on sbcl. > But in the installation, I get error for CL-UNICODE. > I have been installed correctly last year. > May be beginning of December is OK. > In these days, this problem occured. > > [environment] > ?* Ubuntu Linux 10.04 lucid > ?* SBCL 1.0.29.11.debian > > > [procedure] > $rm -rf .sbcl > $sbcl > > (require :asdf) > (require :asdf-install) > (asdf-install:install :cl-unicode) > > choose "Personal installation" > choose [SKIP-GPG-CHECK] for cl-unicode > choose [SKIP-GPG-CHECK] again for cl-ppcre > > Then this message appears. > ================================================================= > debugger invoked on a SB-INT:SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR in thread # "initial thread" RUNNING {AA5E589}>: > ?failed to find the WRITE-DATE of > /home/test/.sbcl/site/cl-unicode-0.1.1/lists.lisp: > ? ?No such file or directory > > Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. > > restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name): > ?0: [RETRY] Retry installation > ?1: ? ? ? ? Retry installation > ?2: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level. > > (SB-IMPL::SIMPLE-FILE-PERROR > ?"failed to find the WRITE-DATE of ~A" > ?#P"/home/test/.sbcl/site/cl-unicode-0.1.1/lists.lisp" > ?2) > ================================================================= > > And I have made a backup of .sbcl last year. > So I copied "lists.lisp" to /home/test/.sbcl/site/cl-unicode-0.1.1/ > Do above process (except for rm) again. > Then installation have finished correctly. > > How can I install CL-UNICODE without copy lists.lisp? > Or why this problem occurs. > > > I don't know that asking here is correct or not. > But I don't know well about lisp communities. > > > Sincerely, > Hiroshi > > > _______________________________________________ > cl-ppcre-devel site list > cl-ppcre-devel at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-devel > > From sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp Mon Jan 17 13:22:08 2011 From: sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp (Hiroshi Sakate) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:22:08 +0900 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE In-Reply-To: References: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: <4D344280.2040704@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Thank you for your quick replying! Hmmm, checking version of ASDF was difficult for me. I tried this command. (asdf:asdf-version) But I got ================================================================= Symbol "ASDF-VERSION" not found in the ASDF package. ================================================================= And download sbcl source "sbcl_1.0.29.11.orig.tar.gz" from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/sbcl/1:1.0.29.11-1ubuntu1 Then I got this from contrib/asdf/asdf.lisp ================================================================= ;;; This is asdf: Another System Definition Facility. 1.130 ================================================================= contrib/asdf-install/asdf-install.asd ================================================================= (defsystem asdf-install :depends-on (sb-posix sb-bsd-sockets) :version "0.2" #+sb-building-contrib :pathname #+sb-building-contrib "SYS:CONTRIB;ASDF-INSTALL;" :components ((:file "defpackage") (:file "installer" :depends-on ("defpackage")))) ================================================================= Is this correct information? If you want other information please ask me. Cheers, Hiroshi. (2011?01?17? 21:25), Edi Weitz wrote: > Hi, > > It's fine to ask here. > > The file lists.lisp should be generated automatically the first time > you load CL-UNICODE. As that didn't seem to happen in your case, I > can only guess that there's some incompatibility in your setup. What > for example is the version of ASDF you are using? > > Maybe someone else on this list has an idea? > > Cheers, > Edi. > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Hiroshi Sakate > wrote: >> To: cl-ppcre-devel members >> >> Hi I'm Hiroshi. >> >> I want to use CL-EMB on sbcl. >> But in the installation, I get error for CL-UNICODE. >> I have been installed correctly last year. >> May be beginning of December is OK. >> In these days, this problem occured. >> >> [environment] >> * Ubuntu Linux 10.04 lucid >> * SBCL 1.0.29.11.debian >> >> >> [procedure] >> $rm -rf .sbcl >> $sbcl >> >> (require :asdf) >> (require :asdf-install) >> (asdf-install:install :cl-unicode) >> >> choose "Personal installation" >> choose [SKIP-GPG-CHECK] for cl-unicode >> choose [SKIP-GPG-CHECK] again for cl-ppcre >> >> Then this message appears. >> ================================================================= >> debugger invoked on a SB-INT:SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR in thread #> "initial thread" RUNNING {AA5E589}>: >> failed to find the WRITE-DATE of >> /home/test/.sbcl/site/cl-unicode-0.1.1/lists.lisp: >> No such file or directory >> >> Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. >> >> restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name): >> 0: [RETRY] Retry installation >> 1: Retry installation >> 2: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level. >> >> (SB-IMPL::SIMPLE-FILE-PERROR >> "failed to find the WRITE-DATE of ~A" >> #P"/home/test/.sbcl/site/cl-unicode-0.1.1/lists.lisp" >> 2) >> ================================================================= >> >> And I have made a backup of .sbcl last year. >> So I copied "lists.lisp" to /home/test/.sbcl/site/cl-unicode-0.1.1/ >> Do above process (except for rm) again. >> Then installation have finished correctly. >> >> How can I install CL-UNICODE without copy lists.lisp? >> Or why this problem occurs. >> >> >> I don't know that asking here is correct or not. >> But I don't know well about lisp communities. >> >> >> Sincerely, >> Hiroshi >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cl-ppcre-devel site list >> cl-ppcre-devel at common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-devel >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > cl-ppcre-devel site list > cl-ppcre-devel at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-devel From dochang at gmail.com Tue Jan 18 04:09:28 2011 From: dochang at gmail.com (Desmond O. Chang) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:09:28 +0800 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE In-Reply-To: <4D344280.2040704@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> References: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D344280.2040704@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: Hi Hiroshi, On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 21:22, Hiroshi Sakate wrote: > Thank you for your quick replying! > > Hmmm, checking version of ASDF was difficult for me. > > I tried this command. > (asdf:asdf-version) > But I got > ================================================================= > ? ? Symbol "ASDF-VERSION" not found in the ASDF package. > ================================================================= ASDF-VERSION only exists in ASDF2. Try this: (or #+asdf2 (asdf:asdf-version) #+asdf :old) If it returns a version number, that's the version of ASDF installed. If it returns the keyword :OLD, then you're using an old version of ASDF (from before 1.635). If it returns NIL then ASDF is not installed. See ASDF manual 2.2 for details. > And download sbcl source "sbcl_1.0.29.11.orig.tar.gz" ?from > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/sbcl/1:1.0.29.11-1ubuntu1 > > Then I got this from contrib/asdf/asdf.lisp > ================================================================= > ;;; This is asdf: Another System Definition Facility. ?1.130 > ================================================================= > > > contrib/asdf-install/asdf-install.asd > ================================================================= > (defsystem asdf-install > ? :depends-on (sb-posix sb-bsd-sockets) > ? :version "0.2" > ? #+sb-building-contrib :pathname > ? #+sb-building-contrib "SYS:CONTRIB;ASDF-INSTALL;" > ? :components ((:file "defpackage") > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(:file "installer" :depends-on ("defpackage")))) > ================================================================= > > Is this correct information? > If you want other information please ask me. Please upgrade SBCL first. It has included ASDF2 in recent versions. Thanks, Des From sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp Tue Jan 18 10:55:03 2011 From: sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp (Hiroshi Sakate) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:55:03 +0900 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE In-Reply-To: References: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D344280.2040704@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: <4D357187.20701@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Thank you Des and Edi And I'm sorry that was my fault. I finished to install CL-UNICODE in very simple process. 1. Install Ubuntu 10.04 2. Install sbcl 3. $ ls .sbcl -> No such file or directory 4. Install CL-UNICODE 5. Finished properly. The version check result is below. It's old ASDF! ================================================================= * (or #+asdf2 (asdf:asdf-version) #+asdf :old) :OLD ================================================================= Then what is the reason? I tried below at new machine which is installed Ubuntu&CL-UNICODE. 6. $ mv .sbcl .sbcl.bak 7. install CL-UNICODE 8. lists.lisp not found! I have removed .sbcl to test installation process. That is the problem. ***************************************************************** And I tried same test on Ubuntu "10.10" SBCL version: 1.0.40.0 ASDF version: 1.704 First and Second installation completed successfully! So I think the reason is "Ubuntu 10.04 bug" or "old asdf bug" or both. Do you know about any problem on old asdf? Anyway I can install CL-UNICODE properly. Thank you very much. Cheers, Hiroshi (2011?01?18? 13:09), Desmond O. Chang wrote: > Hi Hiroshi, > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 21:22, Hiroshi Sakate > wrote: >> Thank you for your quick replying! >> >> Hmmm, checking version of ASDF was difficult for me. >> >> I tried this command. >> (asdf:asdf-version) >> But I got >> ================================================================= >> Symbol "ASDF-VERSION" not found in the ASDF package. >> ================================================================= > > ASDF-VERSION only exists in ASDF2. Try this: > > (or #+asdf2 (asdf:asdf-version) #+asdf :old) > > If it returns a version number, that's the version of ASDF > installed. If it returns the keyword :OLD, then you're using an old > version of ASDF (from before 1.635). If it returns NIL then ASDF is > not installed. > > See ASDF manual 2.2 for details. > >> And download sbcl source "sbcl_1.0.29.11.orig.tar.gz" from >> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/sbcl/1:1.0.29.11-1ubuntu1 >> >> Then I got this from contrib/asdf/asdf.lisp >> ================================================================= >> ;;; This is asdf: Another System Definition Facility. 1.130 >> ================================================================= >> >> >> contrib/asdf-install/asdf-install.asd >> ================================================================= >> (defsystem asdf-install >> :depends-on (sb-posix sb-bsd-sockets) >> :version "0.2" >> #+sb-building-contrib :pathname >> #+sb-building-contrib "SYS:CONTRIB;ASDF-INSTALL;" >> :components ((:file "defpackage") >> (:file "installer" :depends-on ("defpackage")))) >> ================================================================= >> >> Is this correct information? >> If you want other information please ask me. > > Please upgrade SBCL first. It has included ASDF2 in recent versions. > > Thanks, > Des > _______________________________________________ > cl-ppcre-devel site list > cl-ppcre-devel at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-devel From dochang at gmail.com Tue Jan 18 15:13:49 2011 From: dochang at gmail.com (Desmond O. Chang) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:13:49 +0800 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE In-Reply-To: <4D357187.20701@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> References: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D344280.2040704@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D357187.20701@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 18:55, Hiroshi Sakate wrote: > > So I think the reason is > "Ubuntu 10.04 bug" or "old asdf bug" or both. > > Do you know about any problem on old asdf? Although I don't know the root problem of it, you should not use deprecated ASDF1 any more. Fortunately, It's very easy to load ASDF2 into your implementation, even it only has ASDF1. Check ASDF manual. Thanks, Des From sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp Wed Jan 19 01:51:57 2011 From: sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp (Hiroshi Sakate) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:51:57 +0900 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE In-Reply-To: References: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D344280.2040704@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D357187.20701@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: <4D3643BD.8090500@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Thank you Des OK. I'll check about ASDF2. If I get some new information, I'll report you again. Maybe the report will be in March. Cheers, Hiroshi (2011?01?19? 00:13), Desmond O. Chang wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 18:55, Hiroshi Sakate > wrote: >> >> So I think the reason is >> "Ubuntu 10.04 bug" or "old asdf bug" or both. >> >> Do you know about any problem on old asdf? > > Although I don't know the root problem of it, you should not use > deprecated ASDF1 any more. Fortunately, It's very easy to load ASDF2 > into your implementation, even it only has ASDF1. Check ASDF manual. > > Thanks, > Des > > _______________________________________________ > cl-ppcre-devel site list > cl-ppcre-devel at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-devel From sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp Wed Jan 19 01:48:48 2011 From: sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp (Hiroshi Sakate) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:48:48 +0900 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE In-Reply-To: References: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D344280.2040704@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D357187.20701@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: <4D364300.6060004@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Thank you Des OK. I'll check about ASDF2. If I get some new information, I'll report you again. Maybe the report will be in March. Cheers, Hiroshi (2011?01?19? 00:13), Desmond O. Chang wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 18:55, Hiroshi Sakate > wrote: >> >> So I think the reason is >> "Ubuntu 10.04 bug" or "old asdf bug" or both. >> >> Do you know about any problem on old asdf? > > Although I don't know the root problem of it, you should not use > deprecated ASDF1 any more. Fortunately, It's very easy to load ASDF2 > into your implementation, even it only has ASDF1. Check ASDF manual. > > Thanks, > Des > > _______________________________________________ > cl-ppcre-devel site list > cl-ppcre-devel at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-devel