From sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp Wed Feb 9 11:44:26 2011 From: sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp (Hiroshi Sakate) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:44:26 +0900 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE In-Reply-To: <4D3643BD.8090500@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> References: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D344280.2040704@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D357187.20701@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D3643BD.8090500@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: <4D527E1A.2010404@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Dear Des and Edi Long time no see and thank you. I could solve the problem with ASDF2! And I am impressed that installing ASDF2 is very easy. After the problem occured. 1. Download asdf.lisp 2. Run sbcl and (load "/path/to/your/installed/asdf.lisp") (require :asdf) (require :asdf-install) (asdf-install:install :cl-ppcre) 3. quit and run again sbcl and (require :cl-ppcre) (require :cl-unicode) That's OK even if I didn't write anything on .sbclrc. But, if I want to write "load asdf.lisp" on .sbclrc, where should I allocate asdf.lisp? Now I allocated it at ~/.sbcl/site/asdf/asdf.lisp Is it natural? (2011?01?19? 10:51), Hiroshi Sakate wrote: > Thank you Des > > OK. I'll check about ASDF2. > If I get some new information, I'll report you again. > Maybe the report will be in March. > > Cheers, > Hiroshi > > > (2011?01?19? 00:13), Desmond O. Chang wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 18:55, Hiroshi Sakate >> wrote: >>> >>> So I think the reason is >>> "Ubuntu 10.04 bug" or "old asdf bug" or both. >>> >>> Do you know about any problem on old asdf? >> >> Although I don't know the root problem of it, you should not use >> deprecated ASDF1 any more. Fortunately, It's very easy to load ASDF2 >> into your implementation, even it only has ASDF1. Check ASDF manual. >> >> Thanks, >> Des >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cl-ppcre-devel site list >> cl-ppcre-devel at common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-devel > > From sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp Wed Feb 9 11:51:01 2011 From: sakate at sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp (Hiroshi Sakate) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:51:01 +0900 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE In-Reply-To: <4D3643BD.8090500@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> References: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D344280.2040704@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D357187.20701@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D3643BD.8090500@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: <4D527FA5.9030908@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Dear Des and Edi (I got a trouble in sending email. If you get duplicate email, I'm sorry for it) Long time no see and thank you. I could solve the problem with ASDF2! And I am impressed that installing ASDF2 is very easy. After the problem occured. 1. Download asdf.lisp 2. Run sbcl and (load "/path/to/your/installed/asdf.lisp") (require :asdf) (require :asdf-install) (asdf-install:install :cl-ppcre) 3. quit and run again sbcl and (require :cl-ppcre) (require :cl-unicode) That's OK even if I didn't write anything on .sbclrc. But, if I want to write "load asdf.lisp" on .sbclrc, where should I allocate asdf.lisp? Now I allocated it at ~/.sbcl/site/asdf/asdf.lisp Is it natural? Cheers, Hiroshi (2011?01?19? 10:51), Hiroshi Sakate wrote: > Thank you Des > > OK. I'll check about ASDF2. > If I get some new information, I'll report you again. > Maybe the report will be in March. > > Cheers, > Hiroshi > > > (2011?01?19? 00:13), Desmond O. Chang wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 18:55, Hiroshi Sakate >> wrote: >>> >>> So I think the reason is >>> "Ubuntu 10.04 bug" or "old asdf bug" or both. >>> >>> Do you know about any problem on old asdf? >> >> Although I don't know the root problem of it, you should not use >> deprecated ASDF1 any more. Fortunately, It's very easy to load ASDF2 >> into your implementation, even it only has ASDF1. Check ASDF manual. >> >> Thanks, >> Des >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cl-ppcre-devel site list >> cl-ppcre-devel at common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/cl-ppcre-devel > > From dochang at gmail.com Thu Feb 10 15:18:46 2011 From: dochang at gmail.com (Desmond O. Chang) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:18:46 +0800 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] I can't install CL-UNICODE In-Reply-To: <4D527E1A.2010404@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> References: <4D34275A.2010600@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D344280.2040704@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D357187.20701@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D3643BD.8090500@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> <4D527E1A.2010404@sc.sys.es.osaka-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: Hi Hiroshi, On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 19:44, Hiroshi Sakate wrote: > Dear Des and Edi > > Long time no see and thank you. > I could solve the problem with ASDF2! > > And I am impressed that installing ASDF2 is very easy. > > After the problem occured. > 1. Download asdf.lisp > 2. Run sbcl and > (load "/path/to/your/installed/asdf.lisp") > (require :asdf) > (require :asdf-install) > (asdf-install:install :cl-ppcre) > 3. quit and run again sbcl and > (require :cl-ppcre) > (require :cl-unicode) > > > That's OK even if I didn't write anything on .sbclrc. > > But, if I want to write "load asdf.lisp" on .sbclrc, > where should I allocate asdf.lisp? > Now I allocated it at ~/.sbcl/site/asdf/asdf.lisp > Is it natural? I put "load" in ~/.config/common-lisp/config.lisp, then symlink ".sbclrc", ".ccl-init.lisp" and ".clisprc.lisp" to that file, so that I can configure all implementations in one file. You can put asdf.lisp anywhere you want, but the same directory is better, you can load it like the following: --------- (load (make-pathname :name "asdf" :type "lisp" :defaults *load-truename*)) --------- Since many implementations already have ASDF2 now, you can write like this: --------- (ignore-errors (require :asdf)) ; maybe faster #-asdf2 (load asdf2...) --------- ASDF2 supports several ways to loading itself. You can choose the best one for yourself. Hope that helps. Des From l.butler at ed.ac.uk Tue Feb 15 13:47:05 2011 From: l.butler at ed.ac.uk (Leo T Butler) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:47:05 +0000 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] compiling cl-ppcre with lisps Message-ID: <20110215134705.196142586dvgw6as@www.staffmail.ed.ac.uk> Hi, I've been trying to use cl-ppcre in Maxima (in order to generate the online help). This has worked very nicely with clisp, cmucl and sbcl but other lisps have had problems. Gcl does not compile cl-ppcre and ecl does but it runs *very* slow. I wonder if you might have any thoughts about this? Here is a link to part of the thread discussing this: http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2011/024147.html and here is the first item in the thread, with a link to the source http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2011/024118.html Thanks, Leo -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. From edi at weitz.de Tue Feb 15 14:34:32 2011 From: edi at weitz.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:34:32 +0100 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] compiling cl-ppcre with lisps In-Reply-To: <20110215134705.196142586dvgw6as@www.staffmail.ed.ac.uk> References: <20110215134705.196142586dvgw6as@www.staffmail.ed.ac.uk> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Leo T Butler wrote: > Here is a link to part of the thread discussing this: > http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2011/024147.html Invalid DEFINE-CONDITION option: (:DEFAULT-INITARGS :POS NIL :STRING *SYNTAX-ERROR-STRING*) This looks like a bug in GCL, not in CL-PPCRE. http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/m_defi_5.htm As to CL-PPCRE being very slow on ECL it'd be nice if you could provide a specific example. IIRC Juan-Jos? is subscribed to this list, so maybe he wants to chime in if there's something in CL-PPCRE that's specifically problematic for ECL. HTH, Edi. From juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com Tue Feb 15 14:38:38 2011 From: juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com (Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:38:38 +0000 Subject: [cl-ppcre-devel] compiling cl-ppcre with lisps In-Reply-To: References: <20110215134705.196142586dvgw6as@www.staffmail.ed.ac.uk> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Edi Weitz wrote: > As to CL-PPCRE being very slow on ECL it'd be nice if you could > provide a specific example. IIRC Juan-Jos? is subscribed to this > list, so maybe he wants to chime in if there's something in CL-PPCRE > that's specifically problematic for ECL. > Yes, it is interesting to have precise performance reports about different libraries. Right now I do not have the resources to follow all of the CL ecosystem, so having some examples where ECL does very badly could help us in fixing the potential problems -- which may be trivial, such as misoptimized code, missing declarations, etc. Juanjo -- Instituto de F?sica Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: