TR: [cl-ppcre-devel] New release 1.2.4

[Gary King]

Yeah... I agree. I've never understood that either...

On Mar 8, 2005, at 3:10 PM, Kick Damien-DKICK1 wrote:

> Hmmm... if one can write a macro that expands to a LOCALLY form in the 
> same place and for the same reason as would might've done with 
> DECLARE, then what is the point of having disallowed one from writing 
> a macro that expands into a DECLARE http://tinyurl.com/6v4v3?   
> <shrug> I suppose it doesn't matter; it does seem better to be able to 
> write a macro that conditionally expands into different values 
> of optimization settings than use read time evaluation.  I'll try 
> riffing off of this GBBopen approach. 
-- 
Gary Warren King, Lab Manager
EKSL East, University of Massachusetts * 413 577 0176

"Why should employers feed troublesome farmworkers to the lions?"
   -- South African Labour Minister spokesman Snuki Zikalala.	
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1096 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-ppcre-devel/attachments/20050308/fdd1037d/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2367 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-ppcre-devel/attachments/20050308/fdd1037d/attachment-0001.bin>