[cl-plus-ssl-devel] naming RAND_bytes wrapper

[Attila Lendvai]

> I am not sure what naming convention to use:
>
>  (original -> FFI binding -> lispy version)
> 1. RAND_bytes -> rand-bytes -> rand-bytes-lispy
> 2. RAND_bytes -> cl+ssl-ffi:rand-bytes -> cl+ssl:rand-bytes (use separate package for the low level bindings)
> 3. RAND_bytes -> rand-bytes -> random-bytes (i.e. for every new function make this decision every time, and joose some similar, but different name from the low-level bindind)
>
> Any suggestions are appreciated.


i'd go with 2 without ruling out the possibility of giving the lispy
version a more reasonable name, like random-bytes in this case.

-- 
 attila

Notice your eroding (digital) freedom, and do something about it!

PGP: 2FA1 A9DC 9C1E BA25 A59C  963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
OTR XMPP: 8647EEAC EA30FEEF E1B55146 573E52EE 21B1FF06
BitCoin: 154uf86Vd9rpjMULd9CXa7nVwikknYZJiB