From 00003b at gmail.com  Sat Mar 13 22:21:32 2010
From: 00003b at gmail.com (Bart Botta)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:21:32 -0600
Subject: [cl-opengl-devel] OpenGL 3.3/4.0 bindings
Message-ID: <77cb99c01003131421g5b73b7ffs9bd05972cc873b46@mail.gmail.com>

I've updated the low level bindings (%gl package) in my cl-opengl fork
at http://github.com/3b/cl-opengl to version 60 of the .spec files,
including gl 3.3 and gl 4.0.
Only minimally tested, but shouldn't have any effect on existing code
aside from a few extension functions whose names changed
(named-make-buffer-resident-nv and named-make-buffer-non-resident-nv
are make-named-* now), an OpenGLES-only enum name change
(:writeonly-rendering-amd to :writeonly-rendering-qcom), and the
disappearance of framebuffer-texture-face, but that doesn't seem to be
in the specification either.

see http://github.com/3b/cl-opengl/issues for a list of known issues,
feel free to add more if you run into any problems with it.

--
b



From luismbo at gmail.com  Sun Mar 14 00:28:12 2010
From: luismbo at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lu=EDs_Oliveira?=)
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:28:12 +0000
Subject: [cl-opengl-devel] OpenGL 3.3/4.0 bindings
In-Reply-To: <77cb99c01003131421g5b73b7ffs9bd05972cc873b46@mail.gmail.com>
References: <77cb99c01003131421g5b73b7ffs9bd05972cc873b46@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <391f79581003131628q6d006c45h2efea5bbd069ba4e@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Bart Botta <00003b at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've updated the low level bindings (%gl package) in my cl-opengl fork

Any reason why we shouldn't make this the official branch and adjust
the webpage links? (And should we point to the issue tracker as well?)

-- 
Lu?s Oliveira
http://r42.eu/~luis/



From ole at sugarshark.com  Sun Mar 14 10:36:07 2010
From: ole at sugarshark.com (Ole Arndt)
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:36:07 +0100
Subject: [cl-opengl-devel] OpenGL 3.3/4.0 bindings
References: <77cb99c01003131421g5b73b7ffs9bd05972cc873b46@mail.gmail.com>
	<391f79581003131628q6d006c45h2efea5bbd069ba4e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <gnus.m3zl2btcko.fsf@sugarshark.com>

Lu?s Oliveira <luismbo at gmail.com> writes:

> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Bart Botta <00003b at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've updated the low level bindings (%gl package) in my cl-opengl fork
>
> Any reason why we shouldn't make this the official branch and adjust
> the webpage links? (And should we point to the issue tracker as well?)

Not that I have any say in this, but I would welcome it. I am using the
fork since quite some time without issues.

Ole
-- 
Ole Arndt                     http://www.sugarshark.com




From 00003b at gmail.com  Sun Mar 14 19:44:42 2010
From: 00003b at gmail.com (Bart Botta)
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:44:42 -0600
Subject: [cl-opengl-devel] OpenGL 3.3/4.0 bindings
In-Reply-To: <391f79581003131628q6d006c45h2efea5bbd069ba4e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <77cb99c01003131421g5b73b7ffs9bd05972cc873b46@mail.gmail.com>
	<391f79581003131628q6d006c45h2efea5bbd069ba4e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <77cb99c01003141244u6974d68dy289293451dbbdb4a@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Lu?s Oliveira <luismbo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Any reason why we shouldn't make this the official branch and adjust
> the webpage links? (And should we point to the issue tracker as well?)
>

OK with me, though if people actually started using the issue tracker
very much, I'd probably want to move it somewhere better.

I think the only major regression from the darcs tree is that the auto
error checking breaks rather badly when used with multiple contexts,
but at least that isn't too hard to disable, and seems useful
otherwise.

--
b