From 00003b at gmail.com  Sat Apr 11 03:24:09 2009
From: 00003b at gmail.com (Bart Botta)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:24:09 -0500
Subject: [cl-opengl-devel] testing...
Message-ID: <77cb99c00904102024q4004fb37gb1c6f32fbdacc816@mail.gmail.com>

Is the list broken, or just slow today?



From 00003b at gmail.com  Sat Apr 11 03:08:33 2009
From: 00003b at gmail.com (Bart Botta)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:08:33 -0500
Subject: [cl-opengl-devel] edge-flag-array and tex-coord-array fix
In-Reply-To: <574391850903260733i154d94aej6074d980a968c33b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <574391850903241858r2abeae1eyadea71f07dfdbc01@mail.gmail.com>
	<574391850903260733i154d94aej6074d980a968c33b@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <77cb99c00904102008j6cfda819g54f659431f79285c@mail.gmail.com>

(just realized that this appears to have never reached the list,
responding so people with commit access can see it too...)

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Brad Beer <bradwbeer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have a (possible) fix for my edge-flag and tex-coord arrays.? Please let
> me know if I am submitting this correctly.

would be better to have one of the formats that shows which file it
is, try diff -Nau or darcs diff

>
> 191c191
> <?????????????? (tex-coord-pointer ,size ,gl-type ,stride ,address-expr))))
> ---
>>?????????????? (,func-name ,size ,gl-type ,stride ,address-expr))))
> 193,194c193
> <????????? `(edge-flag-pointer ,stride ,address-expr))
> <???????? (vertex-attrib
> ---
>>????????? `(,func-name ,stride ,address-expr))??????? (vertex-attrib
>

looks right (aside from apparently losing a newline), probably should
do the same thing for vertex-attrib-pointer a few lines down

given the choice, i'd probably pull that whole API out into a contrib
until it stabilized though (and add a contrib/extension setup of some
sort to cl-opengl in the process...)

--
-3b



From luismbo at gmail.com  Sat Apr 11 10:30:30 2009
From: luismbo at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lu=EDs_Oliveira?=)
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:30:30 +0100
Subject: [cl-opengl-devel] testing...
In-Reply-To: <77cb99c00904102024q4004fb37gb1c6f32fbdacc816@mail.gmail.com>
References: <77cb99c00904102024q4004fb37gb1c6f32fbdacc816@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <391f79580904110330o300b437btfc3a020d7635d047@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Bart Botta <00003b at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the list broken, or just slow today?

WFM. :-)

-- 
Lu?s Oliveira
http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/