[cl-muproc-devel] [Patch] openmcl support

[Rudi Schlatte]

On 5. Jul 2006, at 10:28, Klaus Harbo wrote:

> This is excellent!  I will try to integrate your patch later this week
> and report back.  I'm curious as to your porting experience?  Was it
> hard?  Is there anything I/we could learn from the exercise?  I hope
> that we'll be able to add support for the most popular  
> implementations,
> so any porting insights are welcome!

Well, the only real hurdle was removing without-scheduling in muproc- 
spawn, the rest was straightforward.  The port was basically finished  
over a month ago, but I found the fencepost error in consume-input  
only on tuesday.  I think the next ports will happen faster now that  
we know that indeed only muproc-compat functionality is needed to get  
cl-muproc running.

Cheers,

Rudi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-muproc-devel/attachments/20060705/b865e2e1/attachment.sig>