[cl-json-devel] Any interest in moving from darcs to git?

[Robert Goldman]

On 11/12/12 Nov 12 -5:32 PM, Henrik Hjelte wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Robert Goldman <rpgoldman at sift.info
> <mailto:rpgoldman at sift.info>> wrote:
> 
>     On 11/8/12 Nov 8 -1:31 AM, Henrik Hjelte wrote:
>     > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Robert Goldman
>     <rpgoldman at sift.info <mailto:rpgoldman at sift.info>
>     > <mailto:rpgoldman at sift.info <mailto:rpgoldman at sift.info>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Note that I don't think that darcs, in and of itself, is a bad
>     system.
>     >     But there are more than enough DCVSes out there, and we can
>     use one less
>     >     of them.
>     >
>     >
>     > I think it is a good idea, it crossed my mind too. Also github is
>     a good
>     > environment for cooperating.
>     > I think the darcs repo should live for some time while we
>     double-commit.
>     > If no one objects, I'll try to do it quite soon.
> 
>     Sounds good.  I have a preference for a canonical git repo at
>     c-l.net <http://c-l.net>,
>     although a pointer from the c-l.net <http://c-l.net> web page to one
>     on github would be
>     ok.  
> 
> 
> I read this mail after I did the git migration, but I did it like that. 
> The docs are still on common-lisp but mentions the github url.
>  
> 
>     What I'd like us to avoid is that mess where there are a dozen
>     github repos for the same library, and no one knows which one is
>     canonical.  
> 
>  
> I did a git-repo here: https://github.com/hankhero/cl-json
> I am not sure it would add something to host it on common-lisp.net
> <http://common-lisp.net> instead. Other such as hunchentoot seem to be
> on github.

That looks great, thanks!

Really appreciate your doing this.

Best,
Robert