[cl-irc-devel] New release (from pre_mode_tracking tag)?
Erik Huelsmann
e.huelsmann at gmx.net
Sat May 7 11:19:04 UTC 2005
> On Mar 20, 2005, at 3:57 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>
> >
> > The currently available release is quite old now, so I'm wondering if
> > it
> > isn't time to do a new release. The mode tracking code is too new,
> > although
> > it has been running on my system for a while, so I thought to use the
> > pre_mode_tracking tag to generate a 0.7 release.
> >
> > This brings me to several questions:
> >
> > - What's the numbering scheme?
> > - Is 0.10 deemed acceptable? Or is 0.9 considered to be last before
> > 1.0?
> > - Do the version numbers mean anything wrt guaranteed APIs? (like,
> > for
> > example,
> > in the APR project; see http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html)
> > - What requirements are there for a 1.0 release?
> >
> > Thanks for your reactions!
>
> I think 0.10 would be quite acceptable. So far there have been no
> promises of guaranteed APIs; I don't think that it'd be fair to
> guarantee such a thing without any documentation!
>
> As far as a 1.0 release: mode tracking is a very good thing. I'd like
> to also have some kind of last-seen or last-spoke tracking, and
> documentation. Needless to say I've no time to work on any of this
> myself :-)
Last-spoke tracking can easily be added with the mode-support I recently
added.
Last-seen is more cumbersome, since it requires a (theoretically unbounded)
list of nicks having been in a channel: depending on what you want to
remember for each nick, that can become quite some data. Currently 'user'
objects disappear when the user quits or leaves the last channel, limiting
the list of users-in-memory to all active users...
As far as documentation is concerned: I'm quite busy too, but I'll see what
I can do.
bye,
Erik.
--
+++ Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS +++
GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
More information about the cl-irc-devel
mailing list