[cl-graph-devel] Re: child-vertexes and parent-vertexes swapped in last fix.

[Gary King]

That's weird. Looks like I need another test (not surprising, that).  
Thanks.


On Sep 7, 2008, at 6:26 AM, William Halliburton wrote:

>
> Looks like the last ix incorrectly swapped child-vertexes and parent- 
> vertexes. ;)
>
> STORE> *t*
> #<NODE-TEMPLATE 351 name "application">
>
> STORE> *e*
> #<EDGE 353 "field of" 351 -> 352>
>
> STORE> (target-vertex *e*)
> #<STRING-FIELD 352 name "name">
>
> STORE> (source-vertex *e*)
> #<NODE-TEMPLATE 351 name "application">
>
> STORE> (child-vertexes *t*)
> NIL
>
> STORE> (parent-vertexes *t*)
> (#<STRING-FIELD 352 name "name"> #<STRING-FIELD 354 name "layout">
>  #<VIEW 356 name "basic"> #<VIEW 356 name "basic">)
>
> STORE>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Gary King <gwking at metabang.com> wrote:
> This is fixed in 0.9.1 which I just posted.
>
> Thanks for the report.
> --
> Gary Warren King, metabang.com
> Cell: (413) 559 8738
> Fax: (206) 338-4052
> gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM
>
>
>
>
>

--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413) 559 8738
Fax: (206) 338-4052
gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-graph-devel/attachments/20080909/fc8d9247/attachment.html>