From edi at agharta.de Sun Feb 21 13:04:03 2010 From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:04:03 +0100 Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [hunchentoot-announce] [hunchentoot-devel] PATCH: Some minor fixes for cl-webdav under hunchentoot 1.0 In-Reply-To: <75b4567b1002192100t3476a5d9w8bfa873d21e80dda@mail.gmail.com> References: <75b4567b0911151829u4fd9358bufff4bd7c482cd849@mail.gmail.com> <1266437462.7337.3.camel@mhflaptop01> <1266489921.7418.8.camel@mhflaptop01> <75b4567b1002192100t3476a5d9w8bfa873d21e80dda@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Thanks, I've applied your patches and made a new release (0.2.0) of cl-webdav which can be downloaded from http://weitz.de/ as usual. On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Matthew Curry wrote: > Edi, > > Looks like there are a couple of (return-code) -> (return-code*) > renames missing in the svn repository (revision 4513 right now). ?One > of them I musta missed in my original patch anyway. > copy/move return a 502 Bad Gateway response, which seems odd, but all > other (supported) cadaver commands seem to work. ?patch attached. > > -Matt > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Edi Weitz wrote: >> I think the problem was that my checkout was somehow botched. ?I just >> tried to clean up the mess. ?Please check if it works now. ?If you're >> OK with the changes, we can make this an official release. ?(Now that >> I know that there /is/ one user... :) >> >> And, yes, the URL should be right. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Mattes wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:35 +0100, Edi Weitz wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Ralf Mattes wrote: >>>> >>>> > What's going on here? I can't find the changes to handlers.lisp from >>>> > that patch in the current svn version - the changes to resources.lisp >>>> > seem to be there. How can that happen? >>>> >>>> Aren't these the ones you were looking for? >>>> >>>> http://bknr.net/trac/changeset/3339/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav >>> >>> Hallo Edi, >>> >>> yes, these _are_ the patches (and they are trivial so I already fixed >>> the code locally). My problem was/is: a fresh svn checkout like this: >>> >>> ralf at mhflaptop01:/tmp$ svn co svn://bknr.net/svn/trunk/thirdparty/cl-webdav >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/resources.lisp >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/properties.lisp >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/util.lisp >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/packages.lisp >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/CHANGELOG.txt >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/doc >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/doc/index.html >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/doc/CVS >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Repository >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Root >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/doc/CVS/Entries >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/doc/dav.png >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/handlers.lisp >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/xml.lisp >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/authorized-file-resources.lisp >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/specials.lisp >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/cl-webdav.asd >>> A ? ?cl-webdav/file-resources.lisp >>> Checked out revision 4511. >>> ralf at mhflaptop01:/tmp$ grep content-type cl-webdav/handlers.lisp >>> ? ? ?(setf (content-type) "text/xml; charset=utf-8" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?<---- What happend to the patch? >>> ? ? ?(setf (content-type) "text/xml; charset=utf-8" >>> ? ? ?(setf (content-type) (resource-content-type resource)) >>> ?(setf (content-type) "text/xml; charset=utf-8" >>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(content-type) nil) >>> >>> >>> Something seems utterly strange here. BTW, that svn url is the one used >>> in bknr's "ediware" svn repository - is this out of date? >>> >>> Cheers RalfD >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tbnl-devel site list >> tbnl-devel at common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-devel >> > _______________________________________________ tbnl-announce site list tbnl-announce at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/tbnl-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements From vsedach at gmail.com Sat Feb 27 18:45:19 2010 From: vsedach at gmail.com (Vladimir Sedach) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:45:19 -0500 Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [parenscript-announce] New Parenscript version Message-ID: Exciting things in this release include the long-awaited implicit return functionality, multiple value return, a completely redone and updated manual in HTML format, and many bugfixes. The version naming scheme has now been changed to a . format (the new release is version 2.1). Enjoy! Vladimir _______________________________________________ parenscript-announce mailing list parenscript-announce at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements