on the page still refers to CDR 8, probably a > cut/paste mishap. > > Cheers, > > drewc > > On 10 May 2011 10:56, Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> wrote: >> The document "File-local variables" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 9. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on June 21, 2011, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/ for the details of this document. >> >> -- >> Pascal Costanza >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdr-announce mailing list >> cdr-announce at common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce >> >> _______________________________________________ >> announcements site list >> announcements at common-lisp.net >> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >> -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Sun May 15 13:26:16 2011 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1QLhtH-0001ey-WD for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:26:16 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1QLht4-0001ei-F1; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:26:02 -0700 Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1QLhsy-0001eY-74 for cdr-announce at common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:26:00 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvQHAJMp0E2GuCsB/2dsb2JhbACYD44Fd6hynhWGGQSUMg6KSA Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 15 May 2011 21:56:54 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A34B59056E for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yPC4EKSNMkAA for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (154.93-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.64.93.154]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 693E3590542 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 21:56:52 +0200 Message-Id: <8C36770C-9333-4693-97C7-28ABD1D28DA9 at p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 8 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 20:26:16 -0000 The document "Generic Equality and Comparison for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/8/index.html for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Sun Jun 26 07:09:00 2011 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1Qaq1D-0001MM-Q7 for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:08:59 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1Qaq10-0001M1-O3; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:08:47 -0700 Received: from mxin.vub.ac.be ([134.184.129.112]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1Qaq0x-0001Lt-69 for cdr-announce at common-lisp.net; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 07:08:45 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiwKAHc0B06GuCsB/2dsb2JhbABTmFuGZYgHd4h2oVCeJ4YwBJZjDosv Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.1]) by smtp.vub.ac.be with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2011 16:08:41 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FE75905C3 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at soft.vub.ac.be Received: from soft.vub.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (soft.vub.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29NA0MaRlyIl for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (129.99-64-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.64.99.129]) by soft.vub.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E6F55905BF for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 16:08:39 +0200 Message-Id: <7AEDFE72-AAFC-40B1-9616-B66FFAAD5859 at p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "File-local variables" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [134.184.129.112 listed in list.dnswl.org] Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 9 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:09:00 -0000 The document "File-local variables" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/9/index.html for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Fri Aug 12 23:16:33 2011 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1Qs7WL-0001R8-Pb for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:33 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1Qs7W6-0001Qm-07; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:21 -0700 Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp at gmail.com>) id 1Qs7W2-0001Qd-ML; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:16 -0700 Received: by iyf13 with SMTP id 13so3254873iyf.30 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=bEI8F9xkCprA+Bdc92xrsD3OMoAZZc8LtlsBsIqMqI8=; b=no+DHUDA5tB4iVK5xU1clRW41HQkkq1lxokdcPLqi6QIHUdLS2RK/5B7yCD4BOq7e1 +WdUu9uidZlyiC1+y6k9RVKV5OuR5FRTXQNd7YxmOdKZQY5+I+NkvUhKaxktu1BA0D4B YvYcgAngLncSeG0qR82fNcu0lSn8sAM8YwCfg= Received: by 10.42.97.8 with SMTP id l8mr1776914icn.3.1313216167848; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.253.102] ([115.204.229.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ib5sm2730720icc.0.2011.08.12.23.16.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:16:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp at gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:15:54 +0800 Message-Id: <D58D498A-B521-46BD-BBE6-A8A8577A62BC at gmail.com> To: usocket-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET, version 0.5.3 Changes: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service X-BeenThere: usocket-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET, version 0.5.3 Changes: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel at common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET, version 0.5.3 Changes: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.3 X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 06:16:34 -0000 Hello people, This is a cumulative update for USOCKET, version 0.5.3 Changes: * Bugfix: [MCL] Fixed SOCKET-LISTEN on vector addresses like #(0 0 0 0) * Bugfix: [MCL] Fixed WAIT-FOR-INPUT on passive sockets (stream-server-usocket) * Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed using UDP in delivered applications (thanks to Camille Troillard and Martin Simmons, this is from the legacy LispWorks-UDP project). * Bugfix: [SBCL] Fixed for "SBCL data flush problem", reported by Robert Brown and confirmed by Nikodemus Siivola. Special thanks to: Robert Brown <robert.brown at gmail.com> for his reporting and patching on "SBCL data flush problem". If you want to download this release, please checkout http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/ or just wait for new Quicklisp releases. The API documentation page is still here: http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml Any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. P.S. Now I have a full-time Lisp job in China:) Regards, Chun Tian (binghe) _______________________________________________ usocket-announce mailing list usocket-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Sat Oct 01 08:04:52 2011 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1RA17U-0003Aj-O9 for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:52 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1RA17B-0003AL-Pg; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:33 -0700 Received: from mail-yw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp at gmail.com>) id 1RA179-0003A1-NY; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:32 -0700 Received: by ywn1 with SMTP id 1so2324246ywn.10 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=NY5s9KUW7GG0aeooYy1nO+pEeRW0eY/K4M+SlQ/UVDQ=; b=q9PGNbGkEWTsefk1fgo00zWMo8eY1Jn0CU2OVIisVXtfdD3tSzSpeH99PyjQGZXFt7 TKgVocNZRD+FMgWved55ZjmntBoRheES7oVQqcqVkzdg1IL5znUqYgrLpuBrRjV+Z58N +SuCcI+nDOLPB7/qdtdhwxujjX15uxWh01Cqg= Received: by 10.68.19.100 with SMTP id d4mr66851426pbe.34.1317481465855; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.253.102] ([115.204.229.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lh6sm30811299pbb.12.2011.10.01.08.04.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp at gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 23:04:00 +0800 Message-Id: <A7A8DFBC-69CC-4BC1-9AA3-D73BC45F5005 at gmail.com> To: usocket-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Common Lispers This is a new cumulative update release for USOCKET, version 0.5.4 Changes in this version: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.213.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service X-BeenThere: usocket-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Common Lispers This is a new cumulative update release for USOCKET, version 0.5.4 Changes in this version: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.213.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel at common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Common Lispers This is a new cumulative update release for USOCKET, version 0.5.4 Changes in this version: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.213.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.4 X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:04:53 -0000 SGksIENvbW1vbiBMaXNwZXJzCgpUaGlzIGlzIGEgbmV3IGN1bXVsYXRpdmUgdXBkYXRlIHJlbGVh c2UgZm9yIFVTT0NLRVQsIHZlcnNpb24gMC41LjQKCkNoYW5nZXMgaW4gdGhpcyB2ZXJzaW9uOgoK KiBCdWdmaXg6IFtFQ0xdIEZpeGVkIGZvciBFQ0wncyBNQUtFLUJVSUxEIGJ5IHJlbW92aW5nIHNv bWUgdW5lY2Vzc2FyeSBjb2RlIChyZXBvcnRlZCBieSBKdWFuIEpvc2UgR2FyY2lhLVJpcG9sbCwg dGhlIEVDTCBtYWludGFpbmVyKQoqIEJ1Z2ZpeDogW0FDTF0gRml4ZWQgZm9yIEFsbGVncm8gQ0wg bW9kZXJuIG1vZGUuIChieSBIYW5zIEiouWJuZXIpCiogQnVnZml4OiBbU0JDTF0gU09DS0VULUNP Tk5FQ1Qgb24gVENQIHdvbid0IGNhbGwgYmluZCgpIHdoZW4ga2V5d29yZCBhcmd1bWVudHMgTE9D QUwtSE9TVCBhbmQgTE9DQUwtUE9SVCBpcyBub3Qgc2V0LiAocmVwb3J0ZWQgYnkgUm9iZXJ0IEJy b3duKQoKU3BlY2lhbCB0aGFua3MgKGFnYWluKSB0bzoKCglSb2JlcnQgQnJvd24gPHJvYmVydC5i cm93bkBnbWFpbC5jb20+Cgpmb3IgaGlzIHJlcG9ydGluZyBhbmQgcGF0Y2hpbmcgb24gYSBiaWcg YnVnIGluIFNCQ0wncyBTT0NLRVQtQ09OTkVDVCBmdW5jdGlvbiwgd2hpY2ggaGF2ZSB1bm5lY2Vz c2FyeSBiaW5kKCkgY2FsbHMgcHJldmlvdXNseS4KCklmIHlvdSB3YW50IHRvIGRvd25sb2FkIHRo aXMgcmVsZWFzZSwgcGxlYXNlIGNoZWNrb3V0CgoJaHR0cDovL2NvbW1vbi1saXNwLm5ldC9wcm9q ZWN0L3Vzb2NrZXQvcmVsZWFzZXMvCgpvciBqdXN0IHdhaXQgZm9yIG5ldyBRdWlja2xpc3AgcmVs ZWFzZXMuCgpUaGUgQVBJIGRvY3VtZW50YXRpb24gcGFnZSBpcyBzdGlsbCBoZXJlOgoKCWh0dHA6 Ly9jb21tb24tbGlzcC5uZXQvcHJvamVjdC91c29ja2V0L2FwaS1kb2NzLnNodG1sCgpBcyB1c3Vh bCwgYW55IGZlZWRiYWNrIC0gYnVncyBvciBodWdzIC0gaXMgZ3JlYXRseSBhcHByZWNpYXRlZCwK ClJlZ2FyZHMsCgpDaHVuIFRpYW4gKGJpbmdoZSkKR2xvcml0eSBTb2Z0d2FyZSBMdGQuCgpQLlMu IFdoYXQncyBuZXh0IGluIFVTT0NLRVQ/CgpJIHRoaW5rIGl0J3MgYSBlbmhhbmNlZCBFQ0wgYmFj a2VuZCB3aGljaCB3b3JrcyBpbiBpdHMgYnl0ZS1jb21waWxlci1vbmx5IG1vZGUuIEkgdGhpbmsg dGhpcyBtZWFucyBhbGwgaW5saW5lZCBDIGNvZGUgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHJlcGxhY2VkIGJ5IEZGSSBj b2RlLCBqdXN0IGxpa2Ugd2hhdCBJJ3ZlIGRvbmUgaW4gTFcgYW5kIENMSVNQIGJhY2tlbmRzLiBJ J2xsIGxlYXJuIGhvdyB0byBkbyBpdCByaWdodCBmcm9tIEFTREYuCgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KdXNvY2tldC1hbm5vdW5jZSBtYWlsaW5n IGxpc3QKdXNvY2tldC1hbm5vdW5jZUBjb21tb24tbGlzcC5uZXQKaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLmNvbW1v bi1saXNwLm5ldC9jZ2ktYmluL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vdXNvY2tldC1hbm5vdW5jZQpfX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwphbm5vdW5jZW1lbnRz IHNpdGUgbGlzdAphbm5vdW5jZW1lbnRzQGNvbW1vbi1saXNwLm5ldApodHRwOi8vY29tbW9uLWxp c3AubmV0L21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vYW5ub3VuY2VtZW50cw== >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Mon Feb 27 07:23:36 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1S22QK-0003P0-3j for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:36 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1S22Pw-0003O2-Eu; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:12 -0800 Received: from mail-pw0-f51.google.com ([209.85.160.51]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp at gmail.com>) id 1S22Ps-0003N9-Aa; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:10 -0800 Received: by pbcxa12 with SMTP id xa12so3240502pbc.10 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=guUwyVsUIQIlN8EAw6J0uyxUfXbREnhKthLixgQjEaw=; b=GM8sCa/FeE/4KJE4uWZa3sjUJpUkxKWCIboYbcajPDo7sMlMq5/HaLeDSo095NmCmK G060gKitnBGD6cpOJuS2bzrKKW9CdLTgnOV14aPP6zgoMWBxlZNecPyOs5TvvyAeuUuM DdxVi+EP23jiIR1IO6ShTB9d21eHOS21JBekE= Received: by 10.68.219.130 with SMTP id po2mr35301315pbc.140.1330356182565; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.253.130] ([115.199.241.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id li19sm12955087pbb.17.2012.02.27.07.22.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:23:00 -0800 (PST) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp at gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:22:53 +0800 Message-Id: <3C19759E-75CC-4DE8-B5D7-465DB4E00383 at gmail.com> To: usocket-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.160.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 DECEASED_NO_ML Dead not via mailing list X-BeenThere: usocket-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.160.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel at common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.160.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.5.5 X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:23:36 -0000 Hello, I'm sorry for the late release of new USOCKET updates, but here is the version 0.5.5 Changes in this release: * Enhancement: SOCKET-CONNECT argument :nodelay can now set to :if-supported (patch from Anton Vodonosov). * Enhancement: [server] adding *remote-host* *remote-port* to socket-server stream handler functions (suggested by Matthew Curry) * Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed UDP support for LispWorks 6.1 (patch from Camille Troillard by Martin Simmons). * Bugfix: [LispWorks] Stop using hcl:add-special-free-action for reclaiming unused UDP socket fds to improve multi-threading stablity (suggested by Camille Troillard). * Bugfix: [LispWorks] Fixed SOCKET-CONNECT on Windows, now LOCAL-PORT never have *auto-port* (0) as default value. Special thanks to LispWorks official, Martin Simmons <martin at lispworks.com> whom provided the patch for LispWorks 6.1 compatibility. (And with LispWorks 6.1 released with IPv6 support, now I'm seriously considering USOCKET should also start to support IPv6 in next major release) If you want to download this release, please check http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/ or just wait for next Quicklisp releases. The API documentation page was slightly updated for the new (:NODELAY :IF-SUPPORTED) support in SOCKET-CONNECT: http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. (Due to my recent heavy and hard work on my local Lisp job -- porting a very big commercial Lisp application from single-threaded to multi-threaded model, I'm very sorry that I don't know enough time to release USOCKET 0.6.0 before the end of February, so I decide to release 0.5.5, the last 0.5.x series release. Once I've got my job stabilized again on mid next month, I'll start pushing more work on USOCKET, I promise) Best Regards, Chun Tian (binghe) Gensym Release Owner _______________________________________________ usocket-announce mailing list usocket-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Tue May 22 13:42:22 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1SWvuO-0002ap-Nk for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Tue, 22 May 2012 13:42:22 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1SWvtl-0002YY-Gu; Tue, 22 May 2012 13:41:45 -0700 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1SWvtb-0002Y7-SJ for cdr-announce at common-lisp.net; Tue, 22 May 2012 13:41:37 -0700 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B59F38EFD for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.139 Received: from mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.139]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9382E17208C for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter10-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wtXkzuQyGyiu for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.194.92 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-92-194-108-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.108.194.92]) (Authenticated sender: pascal at p-cos.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B8BA172092 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:15:46 +0200 Message-Id: <D32CD4D1-9811-40CB-BA88-4F4F26D31F57 at p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document 10. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 3, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document 10. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 3, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document 10. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 3, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 10 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 20:42:23 -0000 The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been submitted by Sam Steingold and has been accepted as CDR document 10. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 3, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Sun Jun 03 06:51:31 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1SbBDP-0001nJ-47 for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:51:31 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1SbBCt-0001mn-Gy; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:50:59 -0700 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1SbBCU-0001ln-F6 for cdr-announce at common-lisp.net; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:50:57 -0700 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C2A87164 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.138 Received: from mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.138]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C01617207E for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter9-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XuxD0lZnSFae for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.187.187 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-187-187-108-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.108.187.187]) (Authenticated sender: pascal at p-cos.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 889CD172077 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 15:34:19 +0200 Message-Id: <659FEF0C-BCAF-407E-BE3E-CC09781C6DD1 at p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 11 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:51:31 -0000 The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been submitted by Didier Verna and has been accepted as CDR document 11. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on July 15, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Sun Jun 10 06:32:05 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1SdiFQ-0003VD-Jj for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:32:04 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1SdiFB-0003UZ-4Y; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:31:49 -0700 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1SdiF6-0003U5-KO; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:31:45 -0700 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A33B4037A; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.138 Received: from mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.138]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EEBA8093; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter9-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by mfilter9-d.gandi.net (mfilter9-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g3oR0O7zyrzU; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.247.67 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-67-247-108-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.108.247.67]) (Authenticated sender: pascal at p-cos.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3AB9A8079; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:11 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> In-Reply-To: <21391.1339130972 at gemini.franz.com> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:31:11 +0200 Message-Id: <7F5DDE5C-948F-4605-8638-59C2F13451F7 at p-cos.net> References: <659FEF0C-BCAF-407E-BE3E-CC09781C6DD1 at p-cos.net> <21391.1339130972 at gemini.franz.com> To: smh at franz.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steve, Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the opening page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that page. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE2 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (2) 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE1 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (1) X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steve, Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the opening page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that page. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE2 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (2) 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE1 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (1) Cc: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net, CDR Discussions <cdr-discuss at common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steve, Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the opening page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that page. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE2 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (2) 0.0 T_FRT_PROFILE1 BODY: ReplaceTags: Profile (1) Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 11 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 13:32:05 -0000 Hi Steve, Thanks a lot indeed for your interest in CDR. The rationale for CDR is explained at http://cdr.eurolisp.org/ on the opening page. You should find all answers to the question you posted on that page. But let me stress a few points directly related to your questions: - It is certainly possible to discuss a CDR after it has been finalized. - More specifically, it's also certainly possible to refine a CDR after it has been finalized. However, the particular CDR (with a specific CDR number) cannot be changed anymore. If you want to refine a finalized CDR, you have to submit a new one, which will then receive a new CDR number. New CDRs can claim to updates to existing CDRs. (For example, it is already the case that CDR 4 is a refinement of CDR 0, and the whole CDR process is currently based on CDR 4 rather than CDR 0.) - Whether a particular CDR is eventually accepted by the community or not is in the hands of the community, not in the hands of the CDR editors. CDR is only a repository for documents, not a body that can enforce or endorse standards. This was an intentional design decision, to avoid the need for CDR editors to judge the contents of CDR documents (which they don't), and to avoid legal implications. - There are three mailing lists associated with CDR: cdr-announce is for announcements, cdr-devel is for discussions about the CDR repository and process itself, and cdr-discuss is for discussions about specific CDRs. If you would like to continue a discussion about CDR itself, please do so on cdr-devel. Didier (the author of CDR 11) seems to be willing to discuss CDR 11 on cdr-discuss, so if you are interested in that, please discuss it there. (Authors are encouraged, but not required to discuss documents. Again, CDR is intentionally a light-weight process: Any requirements imposed on authors would need to be checked, and CDR is designed to require as few checks as possible. That's why documents don't even need to be discussed, because it would be hard to judge what would qualify as a "sufficient" amount of discussion. We believe that members of the community are mature enough to decide for themselves what constitutes a "good" CDR or not.) Again, thanks a lot for your interest. I hope this clarifies your questions. Please feel free to comment or discuss this further, if you think there is room for improvement. Best, Pascal P.S.: I personally believe that Duane Rettig's proposal for environment access would be an excellent candidate for a CDR. Franz Inc. probably has more extensions that would be good contributions. Please let us know if we can help with submitting CDR documents, in case you are interested. On 8 Jun 2012, at 06:49, Steve Haflich wrote: > Pascal et al. > > I'm confused, or perhaps only ignorant, about the process underlying the > CDR repository. Once a CDR becomes final after a very short time, there > seems to be no forum or machinery to discuss or refine it. While I find > myself sympathetic to at least some of the stated problems, none of the > stated solutions are fully acceptable -- there are glitches in the > specifications, or important situations missed, or incompatibilities > between proposed changes and the official sanctity of the CL package. > > Is there some forum for further discussion of "final" CDRs? Otherwise > the CDRs seem a rather profitless exercise. > > _______________________________________________ > cdr-announce mailing list > cdr-announce at common-lisp.net > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce -- Pascal Costanza The views expressed in this email are my own, and not those of my employer. _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Sun Jul 08 07:51:21 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1SnspV-0004Pu-FN for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:51:21 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1SnspF-0004PL-OZ; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:51:05 -0700 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1SnspD-0004PE-SJ for cdr-announce at common-lisp.net; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:51:04 -0700 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1DF3B16A for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.139 Received: from mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.139]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C30E172099 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter10-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter10-d.gandi.net (mfilter10-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgQm3oLVX+c8 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.210.186 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-186-210-108-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.108.210.186]) (Authenticated sender: pascal at p-cos.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3454172074 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:43:32 +0200 Message-Id: <9046BB4E-4AEB-4731-86AA-344CFD3BC75A at p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 10 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:51:21 -0000 The document "Functions COMPILED-FILE-P and ABI-VERSION" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/10/index.html for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Sun Jul 15 10:20:02 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1SqSUD-000268-SC for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:20:02 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1SqSTy-00024z-P9; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:19:47 -0700 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1SqSTt-00024h-Pj for cdr-announce at common-lisp.net; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:19:45 -0700 X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492DA3FFA8 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.141 Received: from mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.141]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1776A80C2 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter13-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bLqh5GnJG5Nq for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.129.95 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-95-129-108-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.108.129.95]) (Authenticated sender: pascal at p-cos.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A33EA80BB for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:18:46 +0200 Message-Id: <A218D51A-5457-48F6-9062-E308B0A78C04 at p-cos.net> To: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 11 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:20:02 -0000 The document "Standard output streams default behavior in terminal sessions" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/11/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Fri Sep 21 15:20:15 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1TFBa3-0003h2-2X for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:20:15 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <clfswm-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1TFBZz-0003gl-37; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:20:11 -0700 Received: from smtp04.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.126] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pbrochard at common-lisp.net>) id 1TFBZw-0003gS-UB for clfswm-announce at common-lisp.net; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:20:09 -0700 Received: from minideb ([92.155.70.94]) by mwinf5d07 with ME id 1xpr1k004222d6c03xpr1r; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:49:52 +0200 From: Philippe Brochard <pbrochard at common-lisp.net> To: clfswm-devel at common-lisp.net, clfswm-announce at common-lisp.net Organization: None Mail-Copies-To: never Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:49:49 +0200 Message-ID: <878vc359mq.fsf at common-lisp.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, As said in the previous weeks, there is a new CLFSWM release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106, changes are as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: clfswm-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, As said in the previous weeks, there is a new CLFSWM release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106, changes are as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, As said in the previous weeks, there is a new CLFSWM release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106, changes are as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [clfswm-announce] CLFSWM 1209 is out X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 22:20:15 -0000 Hi all, As said in the previous weeks, there is a new CLFSWM release tagged R-1209. Since the last official release R-1106, changes are as follow: - Transparency support with xcompmgr = - Multi heads support out of the box (no more need for individual hack). There is some new key bindings to circulate through root (ie: screen). = = - New Expos=E9 Mode which support infinite children (previously 26) and multiple roots. = - Better X Errors handling. Also, there is some new modules in the contrib directory: - contrib/toolbar.lisp to display toolbars everywhere. They can be clickable, hidden on click or with pointer motion. = - contrib/wallpaper.lisp to display different wallpaper on different screen. = More information can be found at http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/ As always, thanks a lot for any patch, feedback or request! Best regards and have fun, Philippe _______________________________________________ clfswm-announce mailing list clfswm-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfswm-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Tue Nov 20 12:24:10 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1TauMb-0005uN-V5 for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:24:10 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1TauML-0005rn-Qb; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:23:53 -0800 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1TauMK-0005rS-4n for cdr-announce at common-lisp.net; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:23:52 -0800 X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078D73897C for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:50 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.131 Received: from mfilter11-d.gandi.net (mfilter11-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.131]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834DB17209C for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter11-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter11-d.gandi.net (mfilter11-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LlweFnuq08C2 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:47 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 94.108.66.118 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-118-66-108-94.static.as47377.net [94.108.66.118]) (Authenticated sender: pascal at p-cos.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A908172096 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:47 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> Message-Id: <8727B47E-EBF1-46DB-9BAA-1E3284EB2D85 at p-cos.net> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:55:47 +0100 To: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 $1499$) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document 12. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on January 1, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document 12. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on January 1, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document 12. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on January 1, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 12 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:24:10 -0000 The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Ingvar Mattsson and has been accepted as CDR document 12. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on January 1, 2012, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/12/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Sat Dec 08 00:56:11 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1ThGCh-0004Yp-DZ for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:56:11 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <clfswm-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1ThGCc-0004YT-9F; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:56:06 -0800 Received: from smtp04.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.126] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pbrochard at common-lisp.net>) id 1ThGCa-0004YI-7K for clfswm-announce at common-lisp.net; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:56:05 -0800 Received: from minideb ([83.204.98.245]) by mwinf5d60 with ME id YwRk1k0085HfhKF03wRkhG; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:25:45 +0100 From: Philippe Brochard <pbrochard at common-lisp.net> To: clfswm-devel at common-lisp.net, clfswm-announce at common-lisp.net Organization: None Mail-Copies-To: never Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:25:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87sj7huf07.fsf at common-lisp.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version. There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs has been fixed. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: clfswm-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version. There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs has been fixed. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version. There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs has been fixed. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.126 listed in list.dnswl.org] Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [clfswm-announce] CLFSWM 1212 released X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 08:56:11 -0000 Hi all, I'm pleased to announce the last CLFSWM 1212 version. There is minor changes since the last 1209 version but some ugly bugs has been fixed. Here is a small resume of the git log information: * load.lisp do no run CLFSWM by default. It build an executable lisp image and can download CLX and ASDF if needed (this will help (I hope) lisp newbies). * The ./configure as been replaced by a simple Makefile which ease the load of load.lisp (it search for available lisp implementations). * New .desktop files to ease the login manager integration. * Some bug fixes on multi heads monitors to add or remove monitors on the fly. Non xinerama configuration are correctly handled. * Add support for numeric keypad with numlock on. * Key bindings for main and second mode are shown in menu entry. * I've added an blank-window-mode in contrib/. This way, we can hide part of the screen with blank window. I'm pretty sure nobody except me will use it but it's very useful in school class to hide some part of the screen on interactive presentation with a video projector. I think this version is pretty clean. So I'll made more announcement about it ((fr.)comp.land.lisp and french slashdot equivalent). I don't know where I can make english announcement/presentation (slashdot doesn't seem the place). So if you like it, feel free to share your feeling about CLFSWM. This way, maybe it will show up again on Wikipedia :-) As always any feedback is very welcome. Have fun, Philippe _______________________________________________ clfswm-announce mailing list clfswm-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfswm-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Wed Dec 26 07:59:45 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1TntOS-0001Uv-NN for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:44 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1TntOM-0001Ua-1O; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:38 -0800 Received: from mail-da0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp at gmail.com>) id 1TntOG-0001Tz-LQ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:36 -0800 Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e20so3945236dak.0 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=HctMN/o85y2WcGNMxTdG5/pIg9bAjHZu5WrVciaF/wE=; b=L69i/VH7Bn2x5tRrP6jUDEUAAvMHdmstpQDX+dm+zP/amJuL/IgHw43nmNstYmTmdk Mxc3QPCIKmPkONApRtzRQdLgM2AwlTBGDlBowGHG0/epsKizFAQccERG0Unw21ot6nnT i75Eqp9sbp1C4hQZYF09/0s9m/DNIVliJACGOlU15LugbZ1gQSjqagyfhQ2zrmjruQLe fC73Vtm8zgQC55oQ1V0ALmz4+8kBimjFPzJK4jQHfAwQPvXSEN87rKCdTnD8y+bVR4Fe OrogVJfJyFnJ5dZ9UDfemd35o/vpyZ9eRqM6Nrz8NsNu/7wLlpF3D6UW2M279xSlo0zy 21gA== X-Received: by 10.68.235.40 with SMTP id uj8mr85573285pbc.98.1356537566534; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.253.103] ([125.120.14.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v2sm16706582paz.36.2012.12.26.07.59.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:59:25 -0800 (PST) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp at gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 23:59:17 +0800 Message-Id: <C85819DA-EA41-41F9-B962-E5B65625A71F at gmail.com> To: usocket-announce at common-lisp.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Lispers, We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release. Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-BeenThere: usocket-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0698727182==" X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Lispers, We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release. Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel at common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Lispers, We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release. Changes in this release: [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.6.0 X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:59:45 -0000 --===============0698727182== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-273235943 --Apple-Mail-1-273235943 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear Lispers, We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release. Changes in this release: * New feature: SOCKET-OPTION and (setf SOCKET-OPTION) for seting and = geting various socket options. * New feature: SOCKET-SEND now support an CCL-like OFFSET keyword for = sending only parts of the whole buffer. * New feature: [ECL] Added support for ECL DFFI mode on Windows. (no = need for C compilers now) * Bugfix: [ECL] ECL now list sb-bsd-sockets as a dependency but relies = on REQUIRE. (patched by Juanjo) * Bugfix: [ABCL] Make USOCKET compile warning-free on ABCL again: = MAKE-IMMEDIATE-OBJECT was deprecated a while ago in favor of 2 = predefined constants. * Bugfix: [LispWorks] remove redundant call to = hcl:flag-special-free-action. (reported by Kamil Shakirov) * Bugfix: [CLISP] improved HANDLE-CONDITION for more CLISP environments. For the new API, SOCKET-OPTION, initially we support following options: * RECEIVE-TIMEOUT (SO_RCVTIMEO) * REUSE-ADDRESS (SO_REUSEADDR), for TCP server * BROADCAST (SO_BROADCAST), for UDP client For usage of SOCKET-OPTION and (SETF SOCKET-OPTION), please directly = take a look at "option.lisp" from USOCKET source code. We'll add = documentation later. (Unfortunately, not all CL platforms were full supported at current = time, but we'll fix the missing part soon) As usual, if you want to download this release, please check http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/ or just wait for next Quicklisp monthly dist updates. The API documentation page was here (but I haven't updated it for = SOCKET-OPTION yet ...): http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. P. S. Something currently still in progress: * New feature: CLISP support some advanced TCP features which CLISP's = SOCKET interface not provide * New feature: Macintosh Common Lisp (MCL) support Datagram sockets = (UDP), based on OpenTransport. * New feature: SOCKET-SHUTDOWN for TCP and UDP sockets. Regards, Chun Tian (binghe) USOCKET Team --Apple-Mail-1-273235943 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii <html><head></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; = -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Dear = Lispers,<div><br></div><div>We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 = release.</div><div><br></div><div>Changes in this = release:</div><div><br></div><div><div>* New feature: SOCKET-OPTION and = (setf SOCKET-OPTION) for seting and geting various socket = options.</div><div>* New feature: SOCKET-SEND now support an CCL-like = OFFSET keyword for sending only parts of the whole buffer.</div><div>* = New feature: [ECL] Added support for ECL DFFI mode on Windows. (no need = for C compilers now)</div><div>* Bugfix: [ECL] ECL now list = sb-bsd-sockets as a dependency but relies on REQUIRE. (patched by = Juanjo)</div><div>* Bugfix: [ABCL] Make USOCKET compile warning-free on = ABCL again: MAKE-IMMEDIATE-OBJECT was deprecated a while ago in favor of = 2 predefined constants.</div><div>* Bugfix: [LispWorks] remove redundant = call to hcl:flag-special-free-action. (reported by Kamil = Shakirov)</div><div>* Bugfix: [CLISP] improved HANDLE-CONDITION for more = CLISP environments.</div></div><div><br></div><div>For the new API, = SOCKET-OPTION, initially we support following = options:</div><div><br></div><div>* RECEIVE-TIMEOUT = (SO_RCVTIMEO)</div><div>* REUSE-ADDRESS (SO_REUSEADDR), for TCP = server</div><div>* BROADCAST (SO_BROADCAST), for UDP = client</div><div><br></div><div>For usage of SOCKET-OPTION and (SETF = SOCKET-OPTION), please directly take a look at "option.lisp" from = USOCKET source code. We'll add documentation = later.</div><div><br></div><div>(Unfortunately, not all CL platforms = were full supported at current time, but we'll fix the missing part = soon)</div><div><br></div><div>As usual, if you want to download this = release, please check<br><br><span class=3D"Apple-tab-span" = style=3D"white-space: pre; "> </span><a = href=3D"http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/">http://common-li= sp.net/project/usocket/releases/</a><br><br>or just wait for next = Quicklisp monthly dist updates.<br><br>The API documentation page was = here (but I haven't updated it for SOCKET-OPTION yet ...):<br><br><span = class=3D"Apple-tab-span" style=3D"white-space: pre; "> </span><a = href=3D"http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml">http://comm= on-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml</a><br><br>As usual, any = feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly = appreciated.</div><div><br></div><div>P. S. Something currently still in = progress:</div><div><br></div><div><div>* New feature: CLISP support = some advanced TCP features which CLISP's SOCKET interface not = provide</div><div>* New feature: Macintosh Common Lisp (MCL) support = Datagram sockets (UDP), based on OpenTransport.</div><div>* New feature: = SOCKET-SHUTDOWN for TCP and UDP = sockets.</div></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>= Chun Tian (binghe)</div><div>USOCKET = Team</div><div><br></div></body></html>= --Apple-Mail-1-273235943-- --===============0698727182== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ usocket-announce mailing list usocket-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce --===============0698727182== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements --===============0698727182==-- >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Wed Dec 26 19:22:49 2012 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1To43V-0003Lr-0f for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:49 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <usocket-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1To43I-0003LQ-Ox; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:40 -0800 Received: from mail-da0-f50.google.com ([209.85.210.50]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <binghe.lisp at gmail.com>) id 1To43D-0003L8-Uh; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:35 -0800 Received: by mail-da0-f50.google.com with SMTP id h15so4129591dan.23 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=+Gs0pHm70t8G1pcjQMHicEtLlndJjawPpdDI/L777mk=; b=sYxHG5HtNkGk56ExQ83iv0Gxq4TrroVGnXXriWlYJAIajG/W9OQ6gmLaF6sxx+ox9h adMcqAJOtr59Ho80o11OIeSkK8ef0EkZN18t3tRznqKqAHWDQUjZ6fBK1HEd4Qacr624 zb9NT+AV+aK0xWmGh/UOZxa+fhhTLQh0P+FziRVGB8dWeELjJBbSeq7xDSYsj2JHgxeq Gx1LF3dAe1otneNDSv4lELdc6ShmTEgmIk/tWfZwmn5ZxwTR9IzGvHXWYRmS5p9NU8kw YkrzeSyX+Kj42WdkIWHTzIIrxt4+EXhZTIoHyN8dRwvSj63hn/12LyvlOUYfiVQXEVC7 0ODQ== X-Received: by 10.68.223.135 with SMTP id qu7mr12148744pbc.134.1356578545732; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.82] ([220.191.186.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id is3sm16958083pbc.6.2012.12.26.19.22.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:22:25 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 $1499$) From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.lisp at gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <C85819DA-EA41-41F9-B962-E5B65625A71F at gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:22:21 +0800 Message-Id: <A7913E4C-98AE-48C7-88E3-F325AEE58A35 at gmail.com> References: <C85819DA-EA41-41F9-B962-E5B65625A71F at gmail.com> To: usocket-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Sorry ? suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast, I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's 0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-BeenThere: usocket-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Sorry ? suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast, I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's 0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Cc: usocket development <usocket-devel at common-lisp.net> X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.7 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Sorry ? suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-broadcast, I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. So that's 0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. [...] Content analysis details: (-100.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (binghe.lisp[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Subject: Re: [cl-debian] [ann] [usocket-announce] [ANNOUNCE] usocket 0.6.0 X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 03:22:49 -0000 Sorry =85 suddenly found that ECL actually has no 'sb-bsd-sockets:sockopt-b= roadcast, I've made a small fix to make sure it compiles in ECL correctly. = So that's 0.6.0.1 now. I'll do more careful tests next time. Il giorno 26/dic/2012, alle ore 23:59, Chun Tian (binghe) <binghe.lisp at gmai= l.com> ha scritto: > Dear Lispers, > = > We're glad to announce the USOCKET 0.6.0 release. > = > Changes in this release: > = > * New feature: SOCKET-OPTION and (setf SOCKET-OPTION) for seting and geti= ng various socket options. > * New feature: SOCKET-SEND now support an CCL-like OFFSET keyword for sen= ding only parts of the whole buffer. > * New feature: [ECL] Added support for ECL DFFI mode on Windows. (no need= for C compilers now) > * Bugfix: [ECL] ECL now list sb-bsd-sockets as a dependency but relies on= REQUIRE. (patched by Juanjo) > * Bugfix: [ABCL] Make USOCKET compile warning-free on ABCL again: MAKE-IM= MEDIATE-OBJECT was deprecated a while ago in favor of 2 predefined constant= s. > * Bugfix: [LispWorks] remove redundant call to hcl:flag-special-free-acti= on. (reported by Kamil Shakirov) > * Bugfix: [CLISP] improved HANDLE-CONDITION for more CLISP environments. > = > For the new API, SOCKET-OPTION, initially we support following options: > = > * RECEIVE-TIMEOUT (SO_RCVTIMEO) > * REUSE-ADDRESS (SO_REUSEADDR), for TCP server > * BROADCAST (SO_BROADCAST), for UDP client > = > For usage of SOCKET-OPTION and (SETF SOCKET-OPTION), please directly take= a look at "option.lisp" from USOCKET source code. We'll add documentation = later. > = > (Unfortunately, not all CL platforms were full supported at current time,= but we'll fix the missing part soon) > = > As usual, if you want to download this release, please check > = > http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/releases/ > = > or just wait for next Quicklisp monthly dist updates. > = > The API documentation page was here (but I haven't updated it for SOCKET-= OPTION yet ...): > = > http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/api-docs.shtml > = > As usual, any feedback - bugs or hugs - is greatly appreciated. > = > P. S. Something currently still in progress: > = > * New feature: CLISP support some advanced TCP features which CLISP's SOC= KET interface not provide > * New feature: Macintosh Common Lisp (MCL) support Datagram sockets (UDP)= , based on OpenTransport. > * New feature: SOCKET-SHUTDOWN for TCP and UDP sockets. > = > Regards, > = > Chun Tian (binghe) > USOCKET Team > = _______________________________________________ usocket-announce mailing list usocket-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Tue Jan 01 11:52:22 2013 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1Tq7ss-0002ZR-N3 for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:52:22 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1Tq7sj-0002Yx-46; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:52:13 -0800 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1Tq7sd-0002Yh-EM for cdr-announce at common-lisp.net; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 11:52:11 -0800 X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted X-Policy: 217.70.183.196 is whitelisted Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B6939C6E for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:52:06 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.134 Received: from mfilter4-d.gandi.net (mfilter4-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.134]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2E5172067 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:52:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter4-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter4-d.gandi.net (mfilter4-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aVWO8pnuy04E for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:51:51 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 94.109.37.119 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-119-37-109-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.109.37.119]) (Authenticated sender: pascal at p-cos.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8AB8172080 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:51:50 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> Message-Id: <C6054511-EB2E-4F3F-979E-56FA8F44874A at p-cos.net> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:51:50 +0100 To: "cdr-announce at common-lisp.net" <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 $1499$) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process, we now only list the title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the records. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process, we now only list the title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the records. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process, we now only list the title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the records. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 12 withdrawn X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:52:23 -0000 The document "Generic extendable heaps for Common Lisp" (CDR 12) has been withdrawn. According to the CDR process, we now only list the title of the document and indicate the withdrawn status for the records. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Sun Feb 17 07:28:17 2013 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1U76A5-0000dr-Cw for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:28:17 -0800 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1U769u-0000d0-5f; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:28:06 -0800 Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.89]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1U769r-0000cn-MC for cdr-announce at common-lisp.net; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:28:04 -0800 X-Policy: 217.70.183.195 is whitelisted X-Policy: 217.70.183.195 is whitelisted Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4182442EB6 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mfilter17-d.gandi.net (mfilter17-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.145]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610C6A80C0 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:20 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter17-d.gandi.net Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by mfilter17-d.gandi.net (mfilter17-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FrfxM1l7fZTW for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:18 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 94.109.39.50 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-50-39-109-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.109.39.50]) (Authenticated sender: pascal at p-cos.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8B20A80B4 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:18 +0100 (CET) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> Message-Id: <5467782F-5A53-4858-8720-0A2CFE26B741 at p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:09:18 +0100 To: "cdr-announce at common-lisp.net" <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 $1499$) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 31, 2013, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 31, 2013, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -102.3 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 31, 2013, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. [...] Content analysis details: (-102.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.70.178.89 listed in list.dnswl.org] -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 13 accepted X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:28:17 -0000 The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been submitted by Marco Antoniotti and has been accepted as CDR document 13. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its initial stage and will be finalized on March 31, 2013, unless withdrawn by the author beforehand. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements >From announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net Sun Mar 31 10:04:25 2013 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1UMLg9-0004V2-EF for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:04:25 -0700 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=common-lisp.net) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cdr-announce-bounces at common-lisp.net>) id 1UMLfw-0004UG-OV; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:04:12 -0700 Received: from slow1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.86]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <pc at p-cos.net>) id 1UMLfr-0004Tu-AR for cdr-announce at common-lisp.net; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:04:11 -0700 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.197]) by slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1771F47B41C for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:54:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.141]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360B941C06B for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter13-d.gandi.net Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]) by mfilter13-d.gandi.net (mfilter13-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Ya+c89bOltn for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 94.109.19.151 Received: from koma-komputer.lan (cust-151-19-109-94.dyn.as47377.net [94.109.19.151]) (Authenticated sender: pascal at p-cos.net) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A20FB41C060 for <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> Message-Id: <5229F700-C4E1-4AEC-8777-F596174AE77F at p-cos.net> Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:45:01 +0200 To: "cdr-announce at common-lisp.net" <cdr-announce at common-lisp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 $1503$) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: cdr-announce at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-BeenThere: announcements at common-lisp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: announcements-bounces at common-lisp.net X-Spam-Score: -100.0 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "tiger.common-lisp.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza [...] Content analysis details: (-100.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list Subject: [cl-debian] [ann] [cdr-announce] CDR 13 finalized X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination <cl-debian.common-lisp.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/options/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian> List-Post: <mailto:cl-debian at common-lisp.net> List-Help: <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian>, <mailto:cl-debian-request at common-lisp.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:04:26 -0000 The document "Priority Queues for Common Lisp" has been finalized. According to the CDR process, this document is now in its final stage and cannot be changed anymore. See http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/13/ for the details of this document. -- Pascal Costanza _______________________________________________ cdr-announce mailing list cdr-announce at common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cdr-announce _______________________________________________ announcements site list announcements at common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/announcements From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Mar 13 00:42:28 2009 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:28 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade In-Reply-To: <877i2u1ckp.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <877i2u1ckp.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <handler.s.C.12369048535013.transcript@bugs.debian.org> Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 517839 + upstream Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From luca at pca.it Fri Mar 13 00:38:46 2009 From: luca at pca.it (Luca Capello) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:38:46 +0100 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade In-Reply-To: <20090302130910.19147.68060.reportbug@akazieLX> References: <20090302130910.19147.68060.reportbug@akazieLX> Message-ID: <877i2u1ckp.fsf@gismo.pca.it> tags 517839 + upstream thanks Hi Christoph! Cc:ing the slime-devel mailing list, since this is an upstream issue (already reported, read below). Please keep the Debian BTS as cc:ed (no subscription requnired). On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:09:10 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Updating SLIME in testing fails on configuration. See the aptitude > output attached to this mail. Please always set LANG=C when you provide logs, since it is difficult to parse foreign languages ;-) I can reproduce the bug on a clean cowbuilder chroot: first, I created it for lenny, then installed slime together with xemacs21 and emacs22 (no errors). After that I modified apt's sources.list to point to testing: ===== root at gismo:/# apt-get update Get:1 http://cdn.debian.net testing Release.gpg [197B] Get:2 http://cdn.debian.net testing Release [71.6kB] Get:3 http://cdn.debian.net testing/main Packages [5533kB] Fetched 5604kB in 11s (497kB/s) Reading package lists... Done root at gismo:/# apt-get dist-upgrade [...] The following packages will be upgraded: aptitude base-files bash binutils cl-swank cowdancer cpio cpp cpp-4.3 debconf debconf-i18n debianutils fakeroot findutils g++ g++-4.3 gcc gcc-4.3 gcc-4.3-base gnupg gpgv grep gzip libc6 libc6-dev libdb4.6 libept0 libgcc1 libgcrypt11 libgdbm3 libgmp3c2 libgnutls26 libgomp1 libice6 libmpfr1ldbl libncurses5 libncursesw5 libreadline5 libsepol1 libsm6 libstdc++6 libstdc++6-4.3-dev libtasn1-3 libxapian15 libxau6 libxaw7 mawk mktemp ncurses-base ncurses-bin pbuilder readline-common realpath sed slime tzdata 56 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 37.5MB/38.7MB of archives. After this operation, 3084kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y [...] ===== > Compiling /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.el... > While compiling toplevel forms in file /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.el: > !! error (("Required feature arc-mode was not provided")) >>>Error occurred processing slime.el: > Required feature arc-mode was not provided This is the problem, specific to xemacs21 and not emacs22. The problem is in slime.el at line 69: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (require 'overlay)) (require 'easymenu) (eval-when (compile) (require 'arc-mode) (require 'apropos) (require 'outline) (require 'etags)) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- This has already been reported upstream, see the discussion at http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2008-October/015633.html Quoting Helmut Heller from the thread above: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:49:13 +0100, Helmut Eller wrote: > * Steven E. Harris [2008-10-27 00:21+0100] writes: > >>> Byte-compilation doesn't work in XEmacs, though. >> >> In general, or as a result of this change? Before my last post, I was >> able to byte-compile slime.el when I commented out the `require' form, >> but I concede that I didn't test the result. > > It doesn't work because arc-mode.el in XEmacs provides 'archive-mode > instead of 'arc-mode. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Since on Debian we byte-compile emacsen files at installation, I do not know how to proceed here. Is not this a bug in XEmacs? I would say so and thus reassign the bug to xemacs21. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 314 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090313/db99f685/attachment.sig> From luca at pca.it Fri Mar 13 01:02:04 2009 From: luca at pca.it (Luca Capello) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted slime 1:20090217-2 (source all) Message-ID: <E1Lhvmm-0002dN-E3@ries.debian.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100 Source: slime Binary: slime cl-swank Architecture: source all Version: 1:20090217-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> Description: cl-swank - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server) slime - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs Closes: 518021 Changes: slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/postinst,prerm: - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every Common Lisp-related stuff and the slime package does not need them (Closes: #518021). Checksums-Sha1: 2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Files: 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea 1478 devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f 18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz 8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5rEUACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPBWwQAyCw79dZTl6lhkN2Ep0maI9vL 9XkFbWNQAKyCFp+rfbPzVEsnK4AQqOca56fW93G2S53A/6rrmMKIFHjRdQqBsezb 1wysy0Uv6zMDJWI2kSuwm/+kHBGQbcPtbVOcfeh9JwtPWr8U0gD1b0/HAECgyrb/ C2nYfMRgezva5VPysOU= =f29O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb slime_20090217-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.diff.gz slime_20090217-2.dsc to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.dsc slime_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2_all.deb From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Mar 13 01:15:05 2009 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:15:05 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518021: marked as done (aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze) References: <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em@ries.debian.org> <20090303153229.4011.33921.reportbug@PPP0193985.mtu> Message-ID: <handler.518021.D518021.123690683726888.ackdone@bugs.debian.org> Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 with message-id <E1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em at ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #518021, regarding aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 518021: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518021 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Mikhail Vasil'jev <dlia-spama at mail.ru> Subject: aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:32:29 +0300 Size: 3582 URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090313/04310f88/attachment.mht> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> Subject: Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 Size: 4734 URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090313/04310f88/attachment-0001.mht> From luk at debian.org Fri Mar 13 10:55:58 2009 From: luk at debian.org (Luk Claes) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:55:58 +0100 Subject: No subject Message-ID: <20090313105558.GM1936@station.luk.local> From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Mar 26 23:42:09 2009 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:42:09 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518877: marked as done (libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch) References: <E1Lmyow-0006eE-9H@ries.debian.org> <200903081758.37343.schepler@math.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <handler.518877.D518877.123811082315010.ackdone@bugs.debian.org> Your message dated Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 with message-id <E1Lmyow-0006eE-9H at ries.debian.org> and subject line Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #518877, regarding libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 518877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518877 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Daniel Schepler <schepler at math.berkeley.edu> Subject: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 17:58:37 -0700 Size: 2205 URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090326/f55a57ff/attachment.mht> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> Subject: Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3 Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 Size: 4892 URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090326/f55a57ff/attachment-0001.mht> From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Mar 26 22:45:11 2009 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:45:11 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server In-Reply-To: <87fxgz7vp3.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <87fxgz7vp3.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <handler.s.C.123810735229648.transcript@bugs.debian.org> Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 519920 cl-swank Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `sbcl' to `cl-swank'. > found 519920 1:20090217-1 Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. > severity 519920 normal Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Severity set to `normal' from `normal' > merge 517167 519920 Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Merged 517167 519920. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Mar 26 23:12:04 2009 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:04 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch In-Reply-To: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <handler.s.C.123810894220094.transcript@bugs.debian.org> Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 518877 + pending Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From luca at pca.it Thu Mar 26 23:17:10 2009 From: luca at pca.it (Luca Capello) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted libsigsegv 2.5-3 (source amd64) Message-ID: <E1Lmyow-0006eC-8N@ries.debian.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100 Source: libsigsegv Binary: libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <pkg-common-lisp-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> Description: libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page faults in a portable way libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults in a portable way Closes: 518877 Changes: libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: + Depends: on automake. * debian/rules: + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green <plugwash at p10link.net> (Closes: #518877). Checksums-Sha1: 5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz 9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb 2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Files: b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0 1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860 15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCtYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTOcnQP9EPlWLDbee9PzoyqUAMTf/dkp 3NzgBmwClKAP0VcKLTaex43i/OryiucZm3IpjOUp/VT1J4FsWj5XcEFr1WcoDwVV 76RfR99c/KcErOWD/CP83CGgXZZISheDzrGve/aLwoiSuEmVKoN7E8l8tGTx7uAg 4w8l6d63eCR8nMf0pKI= =EKHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc From luca at pca.it Fri Mar 27 00:31:02 2009 From: luca at pca.it (Luca Capello) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:31:02 +0100 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#456004: Error while loading 50slime In-Reply-To: <1227990689.8876.17.camel@cotton.betterworld.us> References: <20071212212706.26920.85946.reportbug@corn.betterworld.us> <47698D40.8050001@mailworks.org> <1227990689.8876.17.camel@cotton.betterworld.us> Message-ID: <8763hv4xix.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Hi Ross! On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:31:29 +0100, Ross Boylan wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:29 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: >> Ross Boylan wrote: >> > During a recent emacs upgrade the install log shows >> > Setting up emacs22 (22.1+1-2.1+lenny1) ... >> > emacs-install emacs22 >> > .... >> > Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... >> > Error while loading 50slime >> >> I've tried analysing this problem but I have no idea where it comes >> from, but the slime does work for me in the end. The problem is the following lines: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (load (concat "/usr/share/" (if (boundp 'flavor) (symbol-name flavor) "emacs") "/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads")) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The full output helps understanding the problem ===== Setting up emacs22 (22.2+2-5) ... emacs-install emacs22 emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs22 emacsen-common: byte-compiling for emacs22 Loading /etc/emacs22/site-start.d/00debian-vars.el (source)... No /etc/mailname. Reverting to default... Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... Error while loading 50slime ===== /u/s/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el is not present yet, thus the code I reported previously fails. ===== Wrote /etc/emacs22/site-start.d/00debian-vars.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/debian-startup.elc install/slime: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs22 Loading 00debian-vars... No /etc/mailname. Reverting to default... Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el (source)... ===== At this point, /u/s/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el is present because we have already installed slime. Note that /u/s/emacs/site-list/slime/slime-autoloads.el is *always* present, which means one possible solution would be to always load that instead. This does not change anything WRT the current situation, because /u/s/emacs22/site-listp/slime-autoloads.el is exactly the same the slime package install. However, while this would solve the problem, it is not the correct solution, since what we want is to use the compiled elisp files, thus we should replace the above with a simpler (require 'slime-autoloads). The latter should be evaluated *only* if byte-compiled files have been generated, or, witch is the same, if the slime package has been completely installed through emacsen. Suggestions are welcome :-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 314 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090327/437e1793/attachment.sig> From luca at pca.it Thu Mar 26 23:08:50 2009 From: luca at pca.it (Luca Capello) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:08:50 +0100 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch In-Reply-To: <49C4654A.1050305@p10link.net> References: <49C4654A.1050305@p10link.net> Message-ID: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf@gismo.pca.it> tags 518877 + pending thanks Hi Peter! On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:55:54 +0100, peter green wrote: > The attatched patch makes the package use autoreconf rather than > autoconf so all the autotools stuff is regenerated consistantly. Thank you, applied: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-common-lisp/libsigsegv.git;a=commitdiff;h=00ccc3a8e4364496513ce1fe45c46972d7c4fe0f Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 314 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090327/9651234c/attachment.sig> From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Mar 26 22:36:05 2009 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:05 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server In-Reply-To: <87tz5f7w22.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <87tz5f7w22.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <handler.s.C.123810688215715.transcript@bugs.debian.org> Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 517167 cl-swank Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `slime' to `cl-swank'. > found 517167 1:20090217-1 Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From luca at pca.it Thu Mar 26 22:34:29 2009 From: luca at pca.it (Luca Capello) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:29 +0100 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server References: <613b861a0902252149s61a17530p932d3621ad97dc29@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <87tz5f7w22.fsf@gismo.pca.it> reassign 517167 cl-swank found 517167 1:20090217-1 thanks Hi there! Cc:ing the slime-devel@ mailing list, since I think there is a misinterpretation about the function you use. On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:49:48 +0100, A.W. wrote: > Package: slime The bug is not in the slime package, but in the cl-swank one, reassigned. > Version: 1:20090217 This is not a proper Debian version, which is always in the form $UPSTREAM_VERSION-$DEBIAN_REVISION For the next time, can you please submit bugs using the reportbug tool, as explained in the following link? http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting This also helps the environment in which you have experienced the bug, e.g. versions of other dependendent packages and so on. > Starting a new swank server with the following code > > (require 'asdf) This is not needed since ASDF is loaded by default on Debian Common Lisp implementations. > (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'swank) This works as expected. > ;Specifically, this line\/ What does this mean? > (swank:start-server :dont-close t) > > results in the following error: > > debugger invoked on a SB-INT:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR in thread #<THREAD > "initial thread" RUNNING {AA6A649}>: > odd number of &KEY arguments Are you sure that `start-server' is intended to be used from a CL implementation? The source code seems to disagree with this use: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (defun start-server (port-file &key (style *communication-style*) (dont-close *dont-close*) (coding-system *coding-system*)) "Start the server and write the listen port number to PORT-FILE. This is the entry point for Emacs." (setup-server 0 (lambda (port) (announce-server-port port-file port)) style dont-close (find-external-format-or-lose coding-system))) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Leaving the rest of your mail for the slime-devel@ mailing list. > Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. > > restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name): > 0: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level. > > (SWANK:START-SERVER :DONT-CLOSE)[:EXTERNAL] > > > A longer backtrace when trying to load the same code from stumpwm via > stumpwm-mode, though I think all relevant information is the same: > > > odd number of &KEY arguments0: (SB-DEBUG::MAP-BACKTRACE #<CLOSURE > (LAMBDA #) {B95CCAD}>)[:EXTERNAL] > 1: (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE 100 #<SB-IMPL::STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM {B95CC59}>) > 2: (BACKTRACE-STRING) > 3: (ERR "~A")[:EXTERNAL] > 4: (EVAL-LINE "(swank:start-server :dont-close t)") > 5: (CALL-INTERACTIVELY > "eval" > #S(ARGUMENT-LINE > :STRING "eval (swank:start-server :dont-close t)" > :START 39)) > 6: (EVAL-COMMAND "eval (swank:start-server :dont-close t)" NIL) > 7: (HANDLE-STUMPWM-COMMANDS #<XLIB:WINDOW :0 67>) > 8: (HANDLE-EVENT)[:EXTERNAL] > 9: ((FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK)) > 10: ((FLET #:WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS-BODY-[CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK]509)) > 11: (SB-THREAD::CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK > #<CLOSURE (FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK) {B77FDCB5}> > #S(SB-THREAD:MUTEX > :NAME "CLX Event Lock" > :%OWNER #<SB-THREAD:THREAD "initial thread" RUNNING {B696571}> > :STATE 1)) > 12: (XLIB:PROCESS-EVENT #<XLIB:DISPLAY :0 (The X.Org Foundation > R10402000)>)[:EXTERNAL] > 13: (STUMPWM-INTERNAL-LOOP) > 14: (STUMPWM-INTERNAL ":0") > 15: (STUMPWM ":0") > 16: ((LAMBDA ())) > 17: ((LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP)) > > > I don't have any suggestions at the moment, though perhaps the > upstream slime will have a fix soon. It's possible that this is an > sbcl bug, but what research I'm able to do points me to slime/swank. > > I am using Debian GNU/Linux Sid, updated. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 314 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090326/2912c6a4/attachment.sig> From schepler at math.berkeley.edu Mon Mar 30 20:13:39 2009 From: schepler at math.berkeley.edu (Daniel Schepler) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:13:39 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#521906: clisp: FTBFS: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared Message-ID: <200903301313.40166.schepler@math.berkeley.edu> Package: clisp Version: 1:2.44.1-4.1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lisp.run -M /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lispinit.mem -B /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build -N /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/locale -E 1:1 -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -q ../modprep.fas bdb.c ;; MODPREP: "bdb.c" --> #P"bdb.m.c" ;; MODPREP: reading "bdb.c": 105,314 bytes, 2,654 lines ;; MODPREP: 272 objects, 61 DEFUNs, 1 DEFVAR (1 init) ;; packages: ("BDB") MODPREP: wrote bdb.m.c (199,932 bytes) x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Igllib -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type - Wmissing-declarations -Wno-sign-compare -O -DUNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -DDYNAMIC_MODULES -I. -fPIC -I.. -c bdb.m.c -o bdb.o bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_set_options': bdb.c:703: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:703: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once bdb.c:703: error: for each function it appears in.) bdb.c:709: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c: In function 'dbe_get_flags_list': bdb.c:939: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:943: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_get_options': bdb.c:1104: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:1110: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [bdb.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/berkeley-db' make[1]: *** [berkeley-db] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 20:52:50 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:52:50 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net subscription In-Reply-To: <87vdpqivhn.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <87iqltagyk.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <E1LnZ20-0007Ts-02@master.debian.org> <87vdpqivhn.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoOTS-0003Cm-Cr@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/5f475b2f/attachment.ksh> From schepler at math.berkeley.edu Mon Mar 30 21:27:36 2009 From: schepler at math.berkeley.edu (Daniel Schepler) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:27:36 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#521929: gcl: FTBFS: current binutils static libs need -lz Message-ID: <200903301427.36990.schepler@math.berkeley.edu> Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-45 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... gcc -o raw_pre_gcl \ -L. -Wl,-Map raw_pre_gcl_map -lpre_gcl -lSM -lICE -lXmu -lXt -lXext -lXaw -lX11 -lm -pg - lgmp -lreadline -lncurses -lc -lgclp ./libpre_gcl.a(binutils_bfd_compress.o): In function `bfd_uncompress_section_contents': /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:96: undefined reference to `inflateInit_' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:103: undefined reference to `inflate' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:106: undefined reference to `inflateReset' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:108: undefined reference to `inflateEnd' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [raw_pre_gcl_map] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/unixport' make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7' make: *** [build-gprof-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 21:37:06 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:37:06 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-lw-compat In-Reply-To: <87myb2hevd.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.303.1238447496.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87myb2hevd.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPAI-0005iK-5V@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/b9a6de40/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:00:26 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:26 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-uffi In-Reply-To: <87skkufz81.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.302.1238447494.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87skkufz81.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPWs-0003Wr-4g@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/beedd3e4/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:00:59 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:59 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-syslog In-Reply-To: <87ocvifz72.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.301.1238447494.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87ocvifz72.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPXP-0003eK-7r@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/04099df5/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:01:27 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:27 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-ubf In-Reply-To: <87iqlqfz6a.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.305.1238447499.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87iqlqfz6a.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPXr-0003o1-GV@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/05c87191/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:01:54 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:54 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-typesetting In-Reply-To: <87eiwefz5m.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.304.1238447499.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87eiwefz5m.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPYI-0003uQ-7L@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/d3cf38b9/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:02:41 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:41 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-who In-Reply-To: <878wmmfz48.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.306.1238447574.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <878wmmfz48.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPZ3-00046K-GU@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/f4caa618/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:03:05 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:05 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-xmls In-Reply-To: <874oxafz3l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.307.1238447641.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <874oxafz3l.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPZR-0004Cj-Sf@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/8f2a8e45/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:03:30 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:30 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-unit In-Reply-To: <87zlf2ekif.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.308.1238447645.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87zlf2ekif.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPZq-0004Oa-DX@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/42f7a97f/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:03:56 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:56 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-units In-Reply-To: <87vdpqekhp.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.311.1238447689.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87vdpqekhp.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPaG-0004Ty-D8@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/3099a38e/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:04:17 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:04:17 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-utilities In-Reply-To: <87r60eekh4.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.312.1238447689.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87r60eekh4.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPab-0004YI-N4@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/f9e529e8/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:08:17 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:08:17 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net subscription In-Reply-To: <87hc1aekai.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <87iqltagyk.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <E1LnZ20-0007Ts-02@master.debian.org> <87hc1aekai.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoPeT-0005n2-VE@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/88c40218/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:36:53 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:36:53 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cltl In-Reply-To: <87k566bptw.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.331.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87k566bptw.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQ69-0006A3-Ce@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/508b5c6a/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:37:29 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:37:29 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cmucl In-Reply-To: <87fxgubpsw.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.324.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87fxgubpsw.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQ6j-0006IB-Ac@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/f184e7af/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:40:19 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:19 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to gcl In-Reply-To: <87bpribpo6.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.323.1238450900.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87bpribpo6.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQ9T-000776-Or@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/d0912fd1/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:40:44 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:40:44 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to fiveam In-Reply-To: <877i26bpnh.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.332.1238450902.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <877i26bpnh.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQ9s-0007Ba-8h@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/e77b4362/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:41:06 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:06 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to dh-lisp In-Reply-To: <873acubpmv.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.325.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <873acubpmv.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQAE-0007Gi-SZ@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/8ca22318/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:41:29 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:29 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to ecl In-Reply-To: <87y6umab1s.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.327.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87y6umab1s.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQAb-0007Mp-4E@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/45e94cf0/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:41:53 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:41:53 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to common-lisp-controller In-Reply-To: <87tz5aab14.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.333.1238450903.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87tz5aab14.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQAz-0007SY-BR@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/c893ea20/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:42:16 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:16 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to gclcvs In-Reply-To: <87prfyab0h.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.330.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87prfyab0h.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQBM-0007aj-8K@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/0ded0ea9/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:42:37 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:37 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to ironclad In-Reply-To: <87ljqmaazw.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.329.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87ljqmaazw.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQBh-0007g8-N1@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/6ecebe22/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:42:58 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:58 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to hyperspec In-Reply-To: <87hc1aaazb.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.328.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87hc1aaazb.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQC2-0007mp-P8@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/1aff8279/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:43:18 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:43:18 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to clisp In-Reply-To: <87d4byaayr.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.326.1238450901.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87d4byaayr.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQCM-0007zI-Ax@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/6548573b/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 22:46:51 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:46:51 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Last try to remove any cl-debian@common-lisp.net subscription In-Reply-To: <87vdpq8w8h.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <87iqltagyk.fsf@gismo.pca.it> <E1LnZ20-0007Ts-02@master.debian.org> <87vdpq8w8h.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQFn-0000I8-0D@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/b936304d/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:31:34 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:31:34 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to trivial-sockets In-Reply-To: <87k5666110.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.339.1238453214.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87k5666110.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQx4-0002Dt-Fy@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/a668df8f/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:32:16 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:16 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to libsigsegv In-Reply-To: <87fxgu60zx.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.342.1238453215.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87fxgu60zx.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQxk-0002LP-5Q@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/b363ddf5/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:32:36 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:32:36 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to memoization In-Reply-To: <87bpri60z9.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.340.1238453215.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87bpri60z9.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQy4-0002PU-Ef@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/f035d8d1/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:33:02 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:02 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to quick-arrays In-Reply-To: <877i2660yj.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.341.1238453215.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <877i2660yj.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQyU-0002Vx-B3@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/88cc865c/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:33:22 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:22 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to url-rewrite In-Reply-To: <873acu60xz.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.343.1238453217.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <873acu60xz.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQyo-0002ha-S8@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/086988cc/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:33:42 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:33:42 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to xml-to-sexp In-Reply-To: <87y6um4mcy.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.345.1238453217.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87y6um4mcy.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQz8-0002mb-VF@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/6a5400e7/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:34:04 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:04 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to s-xml In-Reply-To: <87tz5a4mcd.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.352.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87tz5a4mcd.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQzU-0002rb-95@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/6915f1fe/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:34:23 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:34:23 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to slime In-Reply-To: <87prfy4mbu.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.347.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87prfy4mbu.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoQzn-0002va-Bc@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/12e4f08e/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:35:29 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:29 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to parenscript In-Reply-To: <87d4by4ma1.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.344.1238453217.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87d4by4ma1.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoR0r-0003Cm-Ro@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/fb1a9ade/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:35:51 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:35:51 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to tbnl In-Reply-To: <878wmm4m9i.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.348.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <878wmm4m9i.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoR1D-0003Go-R2@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/2c2a67c4/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:36:38 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:36:38 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to series In-Reply-To: <87y6um37nn.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.353.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87y6um37nn.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoR1y-0003VI-Tu@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/096094fd/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:37:05 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:37:05 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to onlisp In-Reply-To: <87tz5a37mx.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.349.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87tz5a37mx.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoR2P-0003am-6q@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/a157fcd0/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:52:31 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:31 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to stumpwm In-Reply-To: <87wsa61scq.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.351.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87wsa61scq.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoRHL-0008Ah-38@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/0da92d50/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:53:03 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:03 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to rfc2388 In-Reply-To: <87skku1sbw.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.350.1238453218.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87skku1sbw.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoRHr-0008Kp-60@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/51b77356/attachment.ksh> From owner at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 23:53:26 2009 From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org (owner at packages.qa.debian.org) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:53:26 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to qbook In-Reply-To: <87ocvi1sb7.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <mailman.346.1238453217.1833.cl-debian@common-lisp.net> <87ocvi1sb7.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: <E1LoRIE-00006f-Pj@master.debian.org> An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20090330/f80df8d4/attachment.ksh>

From noreply at release.debian.org Mon Mar 2 16:39:24 2009 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:39:24 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] slime 1:20090217-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the slime source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:20080223-2 Current version: 1:20090217-1 -- This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team is responsible. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From noreply at release.debian.org Mon Mar 2 16:39:24 2009 From: noreply at release.debian.org (Debian testing watch) Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:39:24 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] slime 1:20090217-1 MIGRATED to testing Message-ID: FYI: The status of the slime source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:20080223-2 Current version: 1:20090217-1 -- This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team is responsible. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Mar 3 23:09:03 2009 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:09:03 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#517578: marked as done (gclcvs_2.7.0-93(mips/unstable): FTBFS on mips.) References: <20090228175826.GS22887@apfelkorn> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:02:40 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#517578: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-96 has caused the Debian Bug report #517578, regarding gclcvs_2.7.0-93(mips/unstable): FTBFS on mips. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 517578: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517578 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Peter De Schrijver Subject: gclcvs_2.7.0-93(mips/unstable): FTBFS on mips. Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:58:26 +0200 Size: 3200 URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Camm Maguire Subject: Bug#517578: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-96 Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:02:40 +0000 Size: 4509 URL: From joerg at alea.gnuu.de Sat Mar 7 08:59:16 2009 From: joerg at alea.gnuu.de (=?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg?= Sommer) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 09:59:16 +0100 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518605: Don't put generated/non-config files not in /etc Message-ID: <20090307085916.GA27113@alea.gnuu.de> Package: common-lisp-controller Version: 6.17 Severity: wishlist Hi, the header of the file /etc/lisp-config.lisp tells it shouldn't be edited. So it can't be a config file and should be moved to /var. % sed -n '/don.t ch/,+1p' /etc/lisp-config.lisp ;;; Please don't change this file. Automaticly generated by common-lisp-controller package. ;;; Run dpkg-reconfigure common-lisp-controller as root to change the settings Bye, J?rg. -- System Information: Debian Release: unstable/experimental APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages common-lisp-controller depends on: ii bash 3.2-4 The GNU Bourne Again SHell ii cl-asdf 1.111-1 Another System Definition Facility ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.24 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.31 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii perl 5.10.0-19 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii realpath 1.12 Return the canonicalized absolute common-lisp-controller recommends no packages. Versions of packages common-lisp-controller suggests: pn sbcl (no description available) -- debconf information excluded -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP URL: From schepler at math.berkeley.edu Mon Mar 9 00:58:37 2009 From: schepler at math.berkeley.edu (Daniel Schepler) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 17:58:37 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch Message-ID: <200903081758.37343.schepler@math.berkeley.edu> Package: libsigsegv Version: 2.5-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... debian/rules build dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. touch aclocal.m4 && \ touch configure # autoconf's stuff for bug #466356 cp configure configure.ORG autoconf aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that, you should regenerate the build system entirely. aclocal.m4:14: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63 make: *** [config.status] Error 63 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler From owner at bugs.debian.org Fri Mar 13 00:42:28 2009 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:28 +0000 Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade In-Reply-To: <877i2u1ckp.fsf@gismo.pca.it> References: <877i2u1ckp.fsf@gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 517839 + upstream Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) >From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 01:03:11 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lhvnp-00033O-Pe for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:03:11 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LhvdC-00060c-7Y; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:52:10 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LhvdB-00060Q-OP for slime at packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:52:09 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LhvTc-0001we-Bc; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:16 +0000 X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Luca Capello Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:13 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 517839 X-Debian-PR-Package: slime X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: slime Received: via spool by 517839-submit at bugs.debian.org id=B517839.12369048535031 (code B ref 517839); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:13 +0000 Received: (at 517839) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2009 00:40:53 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 53; hammy, 151; neutral, 243; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, HAS_BUG_NUMBER,IMPRONONCABLE_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LhvQQ-0000Oj-Kg; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:38:58 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from gismo.pca.it (139-205.0-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.0.205.139]) by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KGF001705SRXH00 at victor.unige.ch>; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:38:51 +0100 (MET) Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5C8C02C494; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:38:51 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello To: Christoph Egger CC: 517839 at bugs.debian.org, ML SLIME-devel References: <20090302130910.19147.68060.reportbug at akazieLX> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:38:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20090302130910.19147.68060.reportbug at akazieLX> Message-ID: <877i2u1ckp.fsf at gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:42:16 +0000 Delivered-To: slime at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 517839 + upstream thanks Hi Christoph! Cc:ing the slime-devel mailing list, since this is an upstream issue (already reported, read below). Please keep the Debian BTS as cc:ed (no subscription requnired). [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#517839: slime: SLIME fails to upgrade X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Luca Capello , 517839 at bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:03:12 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tags 517839 + upstream thanks Hi Christoph! Cc:ing the slime-devel mailing list, since this is an upstream issue (already reported, read below). Please keep the Debian BTS as cc:ed (no subscription requnired). On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:09:10 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Updating SLIME in testing fails on configuration. See the aptitude > output attached to this mail. Please always set LANG=3DC when you provide logs, since it is difficult to parse foreign languages ;-) I can reproduce the bug on a clean cowbuilder chroot: first, I created it for lenny, then installed slime together with xemacs21 and emacs22 (no errors). After that I modified apt's sources.list to point to testing: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D root at gismo:/# apt-get update Get:1 http://cdn.debian.net testing Release.gpg [197B] Get:2 http://cdn.debian.net testing Release [71.6kB] Get:3 http://cdn.debian.net testing/main Packages [5533kB] Fetched 5604kB in 11s (497kB/s) Reading package lists... Done root at gismo:/# apt-get dist-upgrade [...] The following packages will be upgraded: aptitude base-files bash binutils cl-swank cowdancer cpio cpp cpp-4.3 debconf debconf-i18n debianutils fakeroot findutils g++ g++-4.3 gcc gcc-4.3 gcc-4.3-base gnupg gpgv grep gzip libc6 libc6-dev libdb4.6 libept0 libgcc1 libgcrypt11 libgdbm3 libgmp3c2 libgnutls26 libgomp1 libice6 libmpfr1ldbl libncurses5 libncursesw5 libreadline5 libsepol1 libsm6 libstdc++6 libstdc++6-4.3-dev libtasn1-3 libxapian15 libxau6 libxaw7 mawk mktemp ncurses-base ncurses-bin pbuilder readline-common realpath sed slime tzdata 56 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 37.5MB/38.7MB of archives. After this operation, 3084kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y [...] =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Compiling /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/slime/slime.el... > While compiling toplevel forms in file /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/slim= e/slime.el: > !! error (("Required feature arc-mode was not provided")) >>>Error occurred processing slime.el:=20 > Required feature arc-mode was not provided This is the problem, specific to xemacs21 and not emacs22. The problem is in slime.el at line 69: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (require 'overlay)) (require 'easymenu) (eval-when (compile) (require 'arc-mode) (require 'apropos) (require 'outline) (require 'etags)) =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- This has already been reported upstream, see the discussion at http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2008-October/015633.html Quoting Helmut Heller from the thread above: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:49:13 +0100, Helmut Eller wrote: > * Steven E. Harris [2008-10-27 00:21+0100] writes: > >>> Byte-compilation doesn't work in XEmacs, though. >> >> In general, or as a result of this change? Before my last post, I was >> able to byte-compile slime.el when I commented out the `require' form, >> but I concede that I didn't test the result. > > It doesn't work because arc-mode.el in XEmacs provides 'archive-mode > instead of 'arc-mode. =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Since on Debian we byte-compile emacsen files at installation, I do not know how to proceed here. Is not this a bug in XEmacs? I would say so and thus reassign the bug to xemacs21. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5qxYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPSfAP7BlHtMm89+ObsfNQ8XWbbQvPM GcQITkl0/ph91CZEVk3bQ6KBBUqZHlOCnSe3XE+93Ik4BLcV749pIKQaBNYYJ5al XzluYLfKU4fGKtOHvKgzaXbPr6nxVHvgvIpoujEydai1hpQ+2R0ciQiTHIhAIEvZ 5zZe/+mVO0wuXnXQfu0= =uktn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- >From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 01:12:54 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LhvxE-0003Ai-Lf for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:54 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LhvxE-0001oX-4P; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:52 +0000 Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LhvxD-0001oL-Nh for slime at packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:51 +0000 Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lhvmm-0002dN-E3; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 From: Luca Capello To: debian-devel-changes at lists.debian.org X-Dak: dak process-unchecked X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ X-Debian: DAK X-Debian-Package: slime MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 Delivered-To: slime at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: upload-source Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100 Source: slime Binary: slime cl-swank Architecture: source all Version: 1:20090217-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team Changed-By: Luca Capello Description: cl-swank - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server) slime - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs Closes: 518021 Changes: slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/postinst, prerm: - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every Common Lisp-related stuff and the slime package does not need them (Closes: #518021). Checksums-Sha1: 2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Files: 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea 1478 devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f 18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz 8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted slime 1:20090217-2 (source all) X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:12:54 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100 Source: slime Binary: slime cl-swank Architecture: source all Version: 1:20090217-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team Changed-By: Luca Capello Description: cl-swank - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server) slime - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs Closes: 518021 Changes: slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/postinst,prerm: - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every Common Lisp-related stuff and the slime package does not need them (Closes: #518021). Checksums-Sha1: 2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Files: 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea 1478 devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f 18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz 8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5rEUACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPBWwQAyCw79dZTl6lhkN2Ep0maI9vL 9XkFbWNQAKyCFp+rfbPzVEsnK4AQqOca56fW93G2S53A/6rrmMKIFHjRdQqBsezb 1wysy0Uv6zMDJWI2kSuwm/+kHBGQbcPtbVOcfeh9JwtPWr8U0gD1b0/HAECgyrb/ C2nYfMRgezva5VPysOU= =f29O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb slime_20090217-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.diff.gz slime_20090217-2.dsc to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.dsc slime_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2_all.deb >From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 01:18:48 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lhw2w-0003DM-Q2 for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:48 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lhw2w-0002k9-6d; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:46 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lhw2v-0002jw-Nu for slime at packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:45 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LhvzO-0007jY-2J; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:15:06 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello Message-ID: References: <20090303153229.4011.33921.reportbug at PPP0193985.mtu> X-Debian-PR-Message: closed 518021 X-Debian-PR-Package: slime X-Debian-PR-Source: slime Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:15:05 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1236906905-29624-0" Delivered-To: slime at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #518021, regarding aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze to be marked as done. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518021: marked as done (aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze) X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:18:48 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1236906905-29624-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #518021, regarding aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) --=20 518021: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D518021 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems ------------=_1236906905-29624-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2009 15:58:55 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 32; hammy, 149; neutral, 89; spammy, 2. spammytokens:0.997-1--H*M:4011, 0.993-1--H*MI:4011 hammytokens:0.000-+--H*M:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*MI:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*x:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*UA:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*x:3.48 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL,SPF_PASS,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: Received: from mx48.mail.ru ([94.100.176.62]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LeWc9-0005jN-Bj for submit at bugs.debian.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:33:01 +0000 Received: from [91.76.197.248] (port=51851 helo=PPP0193985.mtu) by mx48.mail.ru with asmtp id 1LeWc2-0000No-00; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:32:54 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mikhail Vasil'jev To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: aptitude fails to purge slime in squeeze Message-ID: <20090303153229.4011.33921.reportbug at PPP0193985.mtu> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.48 Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:32:29 +0300 X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org Package: slime Version: 1:20090217-1 Severity: normal I upgraded Lenny to Squeeze today, and tried to purge slime. sudo aptitude purge slime Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: slime{p} 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 2269kB will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] y Writing extended state information... Done (Reading database ... 123269 files and directories currently installed.) Removing slime ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/slime.prerm: line 24: unregister-common-lisp-source: command not found dpkg: error processing slime (--purge): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: slime E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages slime depends on: ii emacsen-common 1.4.17 Common facilities for all emacsen Versions of packages slime recommends: pn cl-swank (no description available) ii emacs [info-browser] 22.2+2-5 The GNU Emacs editor (metapackage) ii emacs22 [info-browser] 22.2+2-5 The GNU Emacs editor ii info [info-browser] 4.11.dfsg.1-4 Standalone GNU Info documentation slime suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ------------=_1236906905-29624-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 518021-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2009 01:13:57 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 73; hammy, 151; neutral, 84; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--ftpmaster at debian.org, 0.000-+--HX-Debian:DAK, 0.000-+--H*RU:128.148.34.103, 0.000-+--UD:diff.gz, 0.000-+--v149 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,HEADER_X_KATIE,IMPRONONCABLE_1, IMPRONONCABLE_2,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD1,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2,PGPSIGNATURE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LhvyH-0006z7-4O for 518021-close at bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:13:57 +0000 Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lhvmm-0002dP-Em; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 From: Luca Capello To: 518021-close at bugs.debian.org X-DAK: dak process-unchecked X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ X-Debian: DAK X-Debian-Package: slime MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Bug#518021: fixed in slime 1:20090217-2 Message-Id: Sender: Archive Administrator Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:02:04 +0000 Source: slime Source-Version: 1:20090217-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of slime, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb slime_20090217-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.diff.gz slime_20090217-2.dsc to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2.dsc slime_20090217-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/slime/slime_20090217-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 518021 at bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Capello (supplier of updated slime package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster at debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:32:14 +0100 Source: slime Binary: slime cl-swank Architecture: source all Version: 1:20090217-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team Changed-By: Luca Capello Description: cl-swank - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs (Lisp-side server) slime - Superior LISP Interaction Mode for Emacs Closes: 518021 Changes: slime (1:20090217-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/postinst,prerm: - remove, since dh-lisp takes care of every Common Lisp-related stuff and the slime package does not need them (Closes: #518021). Checksums-Sha1: 2102233b8b29a21483f02d71257742b1b1961368 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 90fe12ae67324f79d603012919206169efc4a65b 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz f2fda04d776012491ae955642d10d9ddf415a1af 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7917c5f31132735315f5f76182969e72cddbf837 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2fdd3d5951062b3f4536dad16dba51efbbccd686466c9302a92c2acbd786b95b 1478 slime_20090217-2.dsc 2461e28b304d7db8c1514c4bb1be35734a6bf98c8f4df7185d71ce25bfff1f47 18693 slime_20090217-2.diff.gz c377609a15ca7e05a7f97cac36a2ae8cd3465e1a9f4626333c22cac71a513850 915902 slime_20090217-2_all.deb 09bfd284f012be23719dbb2ea538301621e58979dfcf44ea1148726dc2578667 466120 cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb Files: 610dba62394bb2969f0c2fb7353fcaea 1478 devel optional slime_20090217-2.dsc 5552216cd020aa54d4959f909d5ed10f 18693 devel optional slime_20090217-2.diff.gz 8ff74217f224c3bbef115f25f5c2ebf4 915902 devel optional slime_20090217-2_all.deb 7571a561c3ce453b8e5c6551a718ab52 466120 devel optional cl-swank_20090217-2_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAkm5rEUACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPBWwQAyCw79dZTl6lhkN2Ep0maI9vL 9XkFbWNQAKyCFp+rfbPzVEsnK4AQqOca56fW93G2S53A/6rrmMKIFHjRdQqBsezb 1wysy0Uv6zMDJWI2kSuwm/+kHBGQbcPtbVOcfeh9JwtPWr8U0gD1b0/HAECgyrb/ C2nYfMRgezva5VPysOU= =f29O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------=_1236906905-29624-0-- >From bounces+20090313-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Fri Mar 13 10:59:26 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Li56r-0005QX-Oa for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:59:26 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Li56q-0001pU-Qc; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:59:24 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Li56q-0001pI-DA for gclcvs at packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:59:24 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Li55B-0005aF-OM; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:41 +0000 X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Luk Claes Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Camm Maguire Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:39 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Message: report 519534 X-Debian-PR-Package: gclcvs X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: gclcvs Received: via spool by submit at bugs.debian.org id=B.123694170816101 (code B ref -1); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:39 +0000 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2009 10:55:08 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 7; hammy, 124; neutral, 31; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--sk:buildd, 0.000-+--podebconf, 0.000-+--po-debconf, 0.000-+--builddepends X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FROMDEVELOPER, HAS_PACKAGE,IMPRONONCABLE_1,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mailrelay007.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.173]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Li52h-00045R-PL for submit at bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:55:07 +0000 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-Ironport-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-Ironport-Anti-Spam-Result: AiYFAL7XuUlbsO7u/2dsb2JhbACBTs4gg34G Received: from 238.238-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO station.luk.local) ([91.176.238.238]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2009 11:55:00 +0100 Received: from luk by station.luk.local with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Li53W-0000an-QS for submit at bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:55:58 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:55:58 +0100 From: Luk Claes To: submit at bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20090313105558.GM1936 at station.luk.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:57:41 +0000 Delivered-To: gclcvs at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: gclcvs at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: gclcvs X-PTS-Package: gclcvs X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Package: gclcvs Version: 2.7.0-96 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Subject: Re: Log for failed build of gclcvs_2.7.0-96 on alpha Reply-To: [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_H >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:35 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LnULD-0002Lo-31 for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:35 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmzFi-0000DV-0E for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:44:50 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmzFh-0000DG-Ds for libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:44:49 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LmzD7-0004Ae-5K; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:42:09 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello Message-ID: References: <200903081758.37343.schepler at math.berkeley.edu> X-Debian-PR-Message: closed 518877 X-Debian-PR-Package: libsigsegv X-Debian-PR-Keywords: patch X-Debian-PR-Source: libsigsegv Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:42:09 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1238110929-16024-0" Delivered-To: libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Keyword: bts Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Your message dated Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #518877, regarding libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch to be marked as done. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518877: marked as done (libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch) X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:37 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1238110929-16024-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Your message dated Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 with message-id and subject line Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #518877, regarding libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) --=20 518877: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D518877 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems ------------=_1238110929-16024-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2009 00:58:39 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 16; hammy, 111; neutral, 40; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--H*u:KDE, 0.000-+--H*UA:KDE, 0.000-+--sk:dpkgbu, 0.000-+--sk:dpkg-bu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LgTpH-0001vV-28 for submit at bugs.debian.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:58:39 +0000 Received: from frobnitz.localnet ([76.90.122.170]) by hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090309005833.SPIQ3931.hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com at frobnitz.localnet> for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 00:58:33 +0000 From: Daniel Schepler To: submit at bugs.debian.org Subject: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 17:58:37 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903081758.37343.schepler at math.berkeley.edu> Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org Package: libsigsegv Version: 2.5-2 Severity: serious =46rom my pbuilder build log: =2E.. debian/rules build dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. touch aclocal.m4 && \ touch configure # autoconf's stuff for bug #466356 cp configure configure.ORG autoconf aclocal.m4:14: error: this file was generated for autoconf 2.61. You have another version of autoconf. If you want to use that, you should regenerate the build system entirely. aclocal.m4:14: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 63 make: *** [config.status] Error 63 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 =2D-=20 Daniel Schepler ------------=_1238110929-16024-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 518877-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2009 23:40:23 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 61; hammy, 151; neutral, 108; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--ftpmaster at debian.org, 0.000-+--HX-Debian:DAK, 0.000-+--H*RU:128.148.34.103, 0.000-+--UD:diff.gz, 0.000-+--v149 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,HEADER_X_KATIE,IMPRONONCABLE_2, MURPHY_WRONG_WORD1,MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2,PGPSIGNATURE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LmzBP-0003ta-6j for 518877-close at bugs.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:40:23 +0000 Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lmyow-0006eE-9H; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 From: Luca Capello To: 518877-close at bugs.debian.org X-DAK: dak process-unchecked X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ X-Debian: DAK X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Bug#518877: fixed in libsigsegv 2.5-3 Message-Id: Sender: Archive Administrator Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 Source: libsigsegv Source-Version: 2.5-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libsigsegv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 518877 at bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Capello (supplier of updated libsigsegv package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster at debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100 Source: libsigsegv Binary: libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team Changed-By: Luca Capello Description: libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page faults in a portable way libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults in a portable way Closes: 518877 Changes: libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: + Depends: on automake. * debian/rules: + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green (Closes: #518877). Checksums-Sha1: 5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz 9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb 2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Files: b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0 1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860 15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCtYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTOcnQP9EPlWLDbee9PzoyqUAMTf/dkp 3NzgBmwClKAP0VcKLTaex43i/OryiucZm3IpjOUp/VT1J4FsWj5XcEFr1WcoDwVV 76RfR99c/KcErOWD/CP83CGgXZZISheDzrGve/aLwoiSuEmVKoN7E8l8tGTx7uAg 4w8l6d63eCR8nMf0pKI= =EKHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------=_1238110929-16024-0-- >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:34 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LnULB-0002Lo-Ht for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:33 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyWE-0000Zy-7r; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:57:50 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyWD-0000Za-A3; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:57:49 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyJz-0008ON-AH; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:45:11 +0000 X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello CC: Debian Common Lisp Team (sbcl for {519920}, clswank for {519920,517167}) In-Reply-To: <87fxgz7vp3.fsf at gismo.pca.it> References: <87fxgz7vp3.fsf at gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Package: X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:45:11 +0000 Delivered-To: slime at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 519920 cl-swank Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `sbcl' to `cl-swank'. > found 519920 1:20090217-1 Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:36 -0000 Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 519920 cl-swank Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `sbcl' to `cl-swank'. > found 519920 1:20090217-1 Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. > severity 519920 normal Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Severity set to `normal' from `normal' > merge 517167 519920 Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug#519920: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Merged 517167 519920. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:37 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LnULE-0002Lo-Gj for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:36 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyrF-00058r-7C for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:19:33 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyrE-00058Z-NJ for libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:19:32 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lmyk0-0005sM-Ac; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:04 +0000 X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello CC: Debian Common Lisp Team (libsigsegv for {518877}) In-Reply-To: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf at gismo.pca.it> References: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf at gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Package: X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:04 +0000 Delivered-To: libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 518877 + pending Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000 Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 518877 + pending Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:36 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LnULD-0002Lo-Tw for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:36 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmzCQ-0008Fs-QJ for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:41:26 +0000 Received: from ries.debian.org ([128.148.34.103]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmzCQ-0008Fh-7S for libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:41:26 +0000 Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lmyow-0006eC-8N; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 From: Luca Capello To: debian-devel-changes at lists.debian.org X-Dak: dak process-unchecked X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ X-Debian: DAK X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:17:10 +0000 Delivered-To: libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Keyword: upload-source Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100 Source: libsigsegv Binary: libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team Changed-By: Luca Capello Description: libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page faults in a portable way libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults in a portable way Closes: 518877 Changes: libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: + Depends: on automake. * debian/rules: + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green (Closes: #518877). Checksums-Sha1: 5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz 9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb 2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Files: b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0 1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860 15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted libsigsegv 2.5-3 (source amd64) X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:04:29 +0100 Source: libsigsegv Binary: libsigsegv0 libsigsegv-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team Changed-By: Luca Capello Description: libsigsegv-dev - Library for handling page faults in a portable way libsigsegv0 - Library for handling page faults in a portable way Closes: 518877 Changes: libsigsegv (2.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: + Depends: on automake. * debian/rules: + regenerate all autoreconf's stuff at 'config.status' target and restore the original one at 'clean' target, thanks to Peter Green (Closes: #518877). Checksums-Sha1: 5cf1554ceaccaa4abaaa0e55427154c1c20d00d4 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 1e2cf17cf19445ab20ce84cc8bdba47a53b8f714 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz f58da098409ffedfcaf9c447e9cad916b2b5b0a7 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb e6b3c5d077ca6b4d47095dbe790d08b8d3308f55 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: c6faa7529cde55329dde9236f105457127ed378fe1517056597abdae45d8fda9 1478 libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc d1f274957c716064e124270f13db3354fee6e275122d5e97e467c968030be8e2 4565 libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz 9e1e9178fc89c89377babdec6e82a0691451798c9cea5b758feedb0832fded23 20976 libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb 2128b3b4f43b1f6f3522b5b3848b79c890b58404b1ee605effe81eac26810773 15286 libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb Files: b499515d83f98e45d03efb6a67fc76a0 1478 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc 330b6a3601015d100ed8dd88469d4dca 4565 libdevel optional libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz d6eadbfce0e7c8a525bf69071042f895 20976 libs optional libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb f5ee2ef02c4212fb943938ee0f3fb860 15286 libdevel optional libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCtYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTOcnQP9EPlWLDbee9PzoyqUAMTf/dkp 3NzgBmwClKAP0VcKLTaex43i/OryiucZm3IpjOUp/VT1J4FsWj5XcEFr1WcoDwVV 76RfR99c/KcErOWD/CP83CGgXZZISheDzrGve/aLwoiSuEmVKoN7E8l8tGTx7uAg 4w8l6d63eCR8nMf0pKI= =EKHq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv-dev_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv0_2.5-3_amd64.deb libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.diff.gz libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc to pool/main/libs/libsigsegv/libsigsegv_2.5-3.dsc >From bounces+20090327-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:36 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LnULC-0002Lo-7R for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:34 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ln01k-0000DX-4M; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:34:28 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ln01j-0000DN-KJ for slime at packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:34:27 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ln00M-0007nj-AC; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:02 +0000 X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Luca Capello Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 456004 X-Debian-PR-Package: slime X-Debian-PR-Keywords: help X-Debian-PR-Source: slime Received: via spool by 456004-submit at bugs.debian.org id=B456004.123811387429173 (code B ref 456004); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 456004) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2009 00:31:14 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 59; hammy, 149; neutral, 81; spammy, 2. spammytokens:0.987-1--HTo:D*stanfordalumni.org, 0.952-+--evaluated hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, HAS_BUG_NUMBER, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lmzyb-0007Zz-Lp for 456004 at bugs.debian.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:31:13 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from gismo.pca.it (45-117.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.117.45]) by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KH5002592RUBP00 at victor.unige.ch> for 456004 at bugs.debian.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:31:07 +0100 (MET) Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 371AA2C0C9; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:31:07 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello To: Ross Boylan CC: 456004 at bugs.debian.org References: <20071212212706.26920.85946.reportbug at corn.betterworld.us> <47698D40.8050001 at mailworks.org> <1227990689.8876.17.camel at cotton.betterworld.us> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:31:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1227990689.8876.17.camel at cotton.betterworld.us> Message-ID: <8763hv4xix.fsf at gismo.pca.it> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:33:02 +0000 Delivered-To: slime at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Ross! On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:31:29 +0100, Ross Boylan wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:29 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: >> Ross Boylan wrote: >> > During a recent emacs upgrade the install log shows >> > Setting up emacs22 (22.1+1-2.1+lenny1) ... >> > emacs-install emacs22 >> > .... >> > Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... >> > Error while loading 50slime >> >> I've tried analysing this problem but I have no idea where it comes >> from, but the slime does work for me in the end. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#456004: Error while loading 50slime X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Luca Capello , 456004 at bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ross! On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:31:29 +0100, Ross Boylan wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:29 +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: >> Ross Boylan wrote: >> > During a recent emacs upgrade the install log shows >> > Setting up emacs22 (22.1+1-2.1+lenny1) ... >> > emacs-install emacs22 >> > .... >> > Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... >> > Error while loading 50slime >>=20 >> I've tried analysing this problem but I have no idea where it comes >> from, but the slime does work for me in the end. The problem is the following lines: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (load (concat "/usr/share/" (if (boundp 'flavor) (symbol-name flavor) "emacs") "/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads")) =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The full output helps understanding the problem =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Setting up emacs22 (22.2+2-5) ... emacs-install emacs22 emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs22 emacsen-common: byte-compiling for emacs22 Loading /etc/emacs22/site-start.d/00debian-vars.el (source)... No /etc/mailname. Reverting to default... Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... Error while loading 50slime =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D /u/s/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el is not present yet, thus the code I reported previously fails. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Wrote /etc/emacs22/site-start.d/00debian-vars.elc Wrote /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/debian-startup.elc install/slime: Handling install for emacsen flavor emacs22 Loading 00debian-vars... No /etc/mailname. Reverting to default... Loading /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50slime.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el (source)... =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D At this point, /u/s/emacs22/site-lisp/slime/slime-autoloads.el is present because we have already installed slime. Note that /u/s/emacs/site-list/slime/slime-autoloads.el is *always* present, which means one possible solution would be to always load that instead. This does not change anything WRT the current situation, because /u/s/emacs22/site-listp/slime-autoloads.el is exactly the same the slime package install. However, while this would solve the problem, it is not the correct solution, since what we want is to use the compiled elisp files, thus we should replace the above with a simpler (require 'slime-autoloads). The latter should be evaluated *only* if byte-compiled files have been generated, or, witch is the same, if the slime package has been completely installed through emacsen. Suggestions are welcome :-) Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMHkYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTPKZwP/Q2Z0WKC/PqH1uugH5eDkIsS6 SLabH7O2CdJgrLKMfRph+67ckLVPckje4+Bs3Z8cHp/pWUBEGWvhLxdyr/Hl3Xs5 dGrciuln+/grsLnXHsQdb79WvWOgJif4je0RmCt7HYW+NMN2rZ79/RBufyuncDVx BEoHm+0zm4MQeyDOe0s= =WFdK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:38 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LnULE-0002Lo-Tf for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:37 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmymK-0003M8-3c for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:14:28 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmymJ-0003Lx-F4 for libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:14:27 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lmyjy-0005ry-FK; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:02 +0000 X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Luca Capello Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 518877 X-Debian-PR-Package: libsigsegv X-Debian-PR-Keywords: patch Received: via spool by 518877-submit at bugs.debian.org id=B518877.123810894220104 (code B ref 518877); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:01 +0000 Received: (at 518877) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2009 23:09:02 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 19; hammy, 121; neutral, 30; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, HAS_BUG_NUMBER, IMPRONONCABLE_2,MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lmyh4-0005CJ-72; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:09:02 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from gismo.pca.it (45-117.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.117.45]) by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KH40024NYYVBP00 at victor.unige.ch>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:08:55 +0100 (MET) Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D4552C0C9; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:08:55 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello To: peter green CC: 518877 at bugs.debian.org, Daniel Schepler In-Reply-To: <49C4654A.1050305 at p10link.net> References: <49C4654A.1050305 at p10link.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:08:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87y6ur6fwd.fsf at gismo.pca.it> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:12:02 +0000 Delivered-To: libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: libsigsegv at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Package: libsigsegv X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 518877 + pending thanks Hi Peter! On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:55:54 +0100, peter green wrote: > The attatched patch makes the package use autoreconf rather than > autoconf so all the autotools stuff is regenerated consistantly. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#518877: libsigsegv: FTBFS: autoconf version mismatch X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Luca Capello , 518877 at bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000 --=-=-= tags 518877 + pending thanks Hi Peter! On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:55:54 +0100, peter green wrote: > The attatched patch makes the package use autoreconf rather than > autoconf so all the autotools stuff is regenerated consistantly. Thank you, applied: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-common-lisp/libsigsegv.git;a=commitdiff;h=00ccc3a8e4364496513ce1fe45c46972d7c4fe0f Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMCwIACgkQZwOMsWhEDTMLKwQArtXAeI26G/WtnUNWz3/VKFkR AQpV63r/uDEKtjyZ0gszKWSYlHBjv0Ajgq/Sm5JCCi9ie7H23HckRuqEAgvzkQmK iS+l9v92FfhOPuI3XUSVXluigs8dcauiLRoVhoUnhzQ0duDEJPR9n7Ykao3AcQlt g79eYrH58ReWJMnGZ0Q= =tywT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:39 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LnULG-0002Lo-VA for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:39 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyES-00059u-1Z; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:39:28 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyER-00059k-L8 for slime at packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:39:27 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyBB-0005NP-Am; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:05 +0000 X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Luca Capello CC: Debian Common Lisp Team (slime for {517167}, clswank for {517167}) In-Reply-To: <87tz5f7w22.fsf at gismo.pca.it> References: <87tz5f7w22.fsf at gismo.pca.it> Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Package: X-Debian-PR-Message: transcript Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:05 +0000 Delivered-To: slime at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts-control Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 517167 cl-swank Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `slime' to `cl-swank'. > found 517167 1:20090217-1 Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 -0000 Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 517167 cl-swank Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug reassigned from package `slime' to `cl-swank'. > found 517167 1:20090217-1 Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server Bug marked as found in version 1:20090217-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) >From bounces+20090326-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Sat Mar 28 08:56:40 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LnULH-0002Lo-Ck for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:40 +0000 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyFY-0005Jb-NC; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:40:36 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyFX-0005J9-RT for slime at packages.qa.debian.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:40:36 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LmyB8-0005MI-MN; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000 X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Luca Capello Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 517167 X-Debian-PR-Package: slime X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: slime Received: via spool by 517167-submit at bugs.debian.org id=B517167.123810688215735 (code B ref 517167); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 517167) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2009 22:34:42 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 76; hammy, 151; neutral, 248; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-+--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-+--H*u:linux, 0.000-+--H*UA:linux X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, HAS_BUG_NUMBER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from victor.unige.ch ([129.194.9.224]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lmy9p-0003vz-NL; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:34:41 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from gismo.pca.it (45-117.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.117.45]) by victor.unige.ch (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-5.02 (built Oct 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KH400249XDMBP00 at victor.unige.ch>; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:34 +0100 (MET) Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B8202C0C9; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:34 +0100 (CET) From: Luca Capello To: "A.W." CC: 517167 at bugs.debian.org, ML SLIME-devel References: <613b861a0902252149s61a17530p932d3621ad97dc29 at mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:34:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87tz5f7w22.fsf at gismo.pca.it> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:36:02 +0000 Delivered-To: slime at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: slime at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: slime X-PTS-Package: slime X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: reassign 517167 cl-swank found 517167 1:20090217-1 thanks Hi there! Cc:ing the slime-devel@ mailing list, since I think there is a misinterpretation about the function you use. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50 message body is 25-50% uppercase 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#517167: sbcl has trouble starting a new swank server X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Luca Capello , 517167 at bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:56:41 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable reassign 517167 cl-swank found 517167 1:20090217-1 thanks Hi there! Cc:ing the slime-devel@ mailing list, since I think there is a misinterpretation about the function you use. On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:49:48 +0100, A.W. wrote: > Package: slime The bug is not in the slime package, but in the cl-swank one, reassigned. > Version: 1:20090217 This is not a proper Debian version, which is always in the form $UPSTREAM_VERSION-$DEBIAN_REVISION For the next time, can you please submit bugs using the reportbug tool, as explained in the following link? http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting This also helps the environment in which you have experienced the bug, e.g. versions of other dependendent packages and so on. > Starting a new swank server with the following code > > (require 'asdf) This is not needed since ASDF is loaded by default on Debian Common Lisp implementations. > (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'swank) This works as expected. > ;Specifically, this line\/ What does this mean? > (swank:start-server :dont-close t) > > results in the following error: > > debugger invoked on a SB-INT:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR in thread # "initial thread" RUNNING {AA6A649}>: > odd number of &KEY arguments Are you sure that `start-server' is intended to be used from a CL implementation? The source code seems to disagree with this use: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (defun start-server (port-file &key (style *communication-style*) (dont-close *dont-close*) (coding-system *coding-system*)) "Start the server and write the listen port number to PORT-FILE. This is the entry point for Emacs." (setup-server 0 (lambda (port)=20 (announce-server-port port-file port)) style dont-close=20 (find-external-format-or-lose coding-system))) =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Leaving the rest of your mail for the slime-devel@ mailing list. > Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. > > restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name): > 0: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level. > > (SWANK:START-SERVER :DONT-CLOSE)[:EXTERNAL] > > > A longer backtrace when trying to load the same code from stumpwm via > stumpwm-mode, though I think all relevant information is the same: > > > odd number of &KEY arguments0: (SB-DEBUG::MAP-BACKTRACE # (LAMBDA #) {B95CCAD}>)[:EXTERNAL] > 1: (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE 100 #) > 2: (BACKTRACE-STRING) > 3: (ERR "~A")[:EXTERNAL] > 4: (EVAL-LINE "(swank:start-server :dont-close t)") > 5: (CALL-INTERACTIVELY > "eval" > #S(ARGUMENT-LINE > :STRING "eval (swank:start-server :dont-close t)" > :START 39)) > 6: (EVAL-COMMAND "eval (swank:start-server :dont-close t)" NIL) > 7: (HANDLE-STUMPWM-COMMANDS #) > 8: (HANDLE-EVENT)[:EXTERNAL] > 9: ((FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK)) > 10: ((FLET #:WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS-BODY-[CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK]509)) > 11: (SB-THREAD::CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK > # > #S(SB-THREAD:MUTEX > :NAME "CLX Event Lock" > :%OWNER # > :STATE 1)) > 12: (XLIB:PROCESS-EVENT # R10402000)>)[:EXTERNAL] > 13: (STUMPWM-INTERNAL-LOOP) > 14: (STUMPWM-INTERNAL ":0") > 15: (STUMPWM ":0") > 16: ((LAMBDA ())) > 17: ((LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP)) > > > I don't have any suggestions at the moment, though perhaps the > upstream slime will have a fix soon. It's possible that this is an > sbcl bug, but what research I'm able to do points me to slime/swank. > > I am using Debian GNU/Linux Sid, updated. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAknMAvYACgkQZwOMsWhEDTMqIwP9FqyzS7nCxNE4drYp9Dq/tJZ4 pY2Sf+k46uVdSz8tBqwaB4WWYsQ7H3SNvWMxToBS9B3QVua1sOvfRr3tQ20ym4sP p9xfVEx2n80I33g7KvZmMFap9IxhZeE1mmm4C64XIDcwOgOYB6ryjqYirY7mUa/8 GnaXUmcaiZShs/T0bxs= =NMSM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- >From bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 16:45:49 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoOMe-0003vg-6A for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:45:49 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoNyh-0002JV-5G for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:21:03 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoNyg-0002Iu-FY for clisp at packages.qa.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:21:02 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoNvn-0006y9-O8; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:03 +0000 X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Daniel Schepler Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Common Lisp Team Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Message: report 521906 X-Debian-PR-Package: clisp X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: clisp Received: via spool by submit at bugs.debian.org id=B.123844401222508 (code B ref -1); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2009 20:13:32 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 68; hammy, 141; neutral, 36; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--H*u:KDE, 0.000-+--H*UA:KDE, 0.000-+--sk:dpkgbu, 0.000-+--sk:dpkg-bu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoNrP-0005oj-TF for submit at bugs.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:13:32 +0000 Received: from frobnitz.localnet ([76.90.122.170]) by hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090330201318.HIGC23691.hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com at frobnitz.localnet> for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:13:26 +0000 From: Daniel Schepler To: submit at bugs.debian.org Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:13:39 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200903301313.40166.schepler at math.berkeley.edu> Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:18:03 +0000 Delivered-To: clisp at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: clisp at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: clisp X-PTS-Package: clisp X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Package: clisp Version: 1:2.44.1-4.1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lisp.run -M /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lispinit.mem -B /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build -N /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/locale -E 1:1 -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -q ../modprep.fas bdb.c ; ; MODPREP: "bdb.c" --> #P"bdb.m.c" ; ; MODPREP: reading "bdb.c": 105,314 bytes, 2,654 lines ; ; MODPREP: 272 objects, 61 DEFUNs, 1 DEFVAR (1 init) ; ; packages: ("BDB") MODPREP: wrote bdb.m.c (199, 932 bytes) x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Igllib -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type - Wmissing-declarations -Wno-sign-compare -O -DUNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -DDYNAMIC_MODULES -I. -fPIC -I.. -c bdb.m.c -o bdb.o bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_set_options': bdb.c:703: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:703: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once bdb.c:703: error: for each function it appears in.) bdb.c:709: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c: In function 'dbe_get_flags_list': bdb.c:939: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:943: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_get_options': bdb.c:1104: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:1110: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [bdb.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/berkeley-db' make[1]: *** [berkeley-db] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler [...] Content analysis details: (-3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#521906: clisp: FTBFS: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Daniel Schepler , 521906 at bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:45:49 -0000 Package: clisp Version: 1:2.44.1-4.1 Severity: serious =46rom my pbuilder build log: =2E.. /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/lisp.run -M /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/= debian/build/lispinit.mem -B=20 /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build -N /tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/bu= ild/locale -E 1:1 -Efile UTF-8=20 =2DEterminal UTF-8 -norc -q ../modprep.fas bdb.c ;; MODPREP: "bdb.c" --> #P"bdb.m.c" ;; MODPREP: reading "bdb.c": 105,314 bytes, 2,654 lines ;; MODPREP: 272 objects, 61 DEFUNs, 1 DEFVAR (1 init) ;; packages: ("BDB") MODPREP: wrote bdb.m.c (199,932 bytes) x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Igllib -W -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith= -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type - Wmissing-declarations -Wno-sign-compare -O -DUNICODE -DDYNAMIC_FFI -DDYNAMI= C_MODULES -I. -fPIC=20 =2DI.. -c bdb.m.c -o bdb.o bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_set_options': bdb.c:703: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c:703: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once bdb.c:703: error: for each function it appears in.) bdb.c:709: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this functio= n) bdb.c: In function 'dbe_get_flags_list': bdb.c:939: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this functio= n) bdb.c:943: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) bdb.c: In function 'C_subr_bdb_dbe_get_options': bdb.c:1104: error: 'DB_LOG_AUTOREMOVE' undeclared (first use in this functi= on) bdb.c:1110: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [bdb.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build/berkeley-= db' make[1]: *** [berkeley-db] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/clisp-2.44.1/debian/build' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 =2D-=20 Daniel Schepler >From bounces at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 17:14:01 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoOnw-0004ls-TB for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:14:01 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoOTS-0003Cm-Cr; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:52:50 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org To: luca at pca.it X-Loop: pts at qa.debian.org References: <87iqltagyk.fsf at gismo.pca.it> <87vdpqivhn.fsf at gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87vdpqivhn.fsf at gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Message-Id: Sender: Debian QA Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:52:50 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian at common-lisp.net subscription > unsubscribe cl-lw-compat cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [cl-debian] Last try to remove any cl-debian at common-lisp.net subscription X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:14:01 -0000 Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: Last try to remove any cl-debian at common-lisp.net subscription > unsubscribe cl-lw-compat cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-syslog cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-typesetting cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-ubf cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-uffi cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-unit cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-units cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-utilities cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-who cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. > unsubscribe cl-xmls cl-debian at common-lisp.net A confirmation mail has been sent to cl-debian at common-lisp.net. > thanks Stopping processing here. >From bounces+20090330-cl+2Ddebian=common+2Dlisp.net at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 17:35:14 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoP8U-0005cn-7h for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:35:14 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoP8T-0005Kw-Fa for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:35:13 +0000 Received: from rietz.debian.org ([140.211.166.43]) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoP8S-0005KH-R0 for gcl at packages.qa.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:35:12 +0000 Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoP6P-0003R9-4F; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:15 +0000 X-Loop: owner at bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Daniel Schepler Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Camm Maguire Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Message: report 521929 X-Debian-PR-Package: gcl X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: gcl Received: via spool by submit at bugs.debian.org id=B.12384484769463 (code B ref -1); Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2009 21:27:56 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 34; hammy, 127; neutral, 33; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--Severity, 0.000-+--H*u:KDE, 0.000-+--H*UA:KDE, 0.000-+--sk:dpkgbu, 0.000-+--sk:dpkg-bu X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoP0x-0002LG-DI for submit at bugs.debian.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:27:32 +0000 Received: from frobnitz.localnet ([76.90.122.170]) by hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090330212718.VCIW27506.hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com at frobnitz.localnet> for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:27:21 +0000 From: Daniel Schepler To: submit at bugs.debian.org Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:27:36 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200903301427.36990.schepler at math.berkeley.edu> Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:05 +0000 Delivered-To: gcl at packages.qa.debian.org Precedence: list X-Loop: gcl at packages.qa.debian.org X-Debian: PTS X-Debian-Package: gcl X-PTS-Package: gcl X-PTS-Keyword: bts Resent-Sender: Debian QA X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-45 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... gcc -o raw_pre_gcl \ -L. -Wl, -Map raw_pre_gcl_map -lpre_gcl -lSM -lICE -lXmu -lXt -lXext -lXaw -lX11 -lm -pg - lgmp -lreadline -lncurses -lc -lgclp ./libpre_gcl.a(binutils_bfd_compress.o): In function `bfd_uncompress_section_contents': /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:96: undefined reference to `inflateInit_' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:103: undefined reference to `inflate' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:106: undefined reference to `inflateReset' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:108: undefined reference to `inflateEnd' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [raw_pre_gcl_map] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/unixport' make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7' make: *** [build-gprof-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- Daniel Schepler [...] Content analysis details: (-3.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#521929: gcl: FTBFS: current binutils static libs need -lz X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Reply-To: Daniel Schepler , 521929 at bugs.debian.org List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:35:14 -0000 Package: gcl Version: 2.6.7-45 Severity: serious =46rom my pbuilder build log: =2E.. gcc -o raw_pre_gcl \ -L. -Wl,-Map raw_pre_gcl_map -lpre_gcl -lSM -lICE -lXmu= -lXt -lXext -lXaw -lX11 -lm -pg - lgmp -lreadline -lncurses -lc -lgclp=20 =2E/libpre_gcl.a(binutils_bfd_compress.o): In function `bfd_uncompress_sect= ion_contents': /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:96: un= defined reference to=20 `inflateInit_' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:103: u= ndefined reference to=20 `inflate' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:106: u= ndefined reference to=20 `inflateReset' /tmp/buildd/binutils-2.19.1/builddir-single/bfd/../../bfd/compress.c:108: u= ndefined reference to=20 `inflateEnd' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [raw_pre_gcl_map] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/unixport' make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.7' make: *** [build-gprof-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 =2D-=20 Daniel Schepler >From bounces at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 17:37:07 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPAI-0005df-Ts for cl-debian at common-lisp.net; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:37:07 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPAI-0005iK-5V; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:37:06 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner at common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts at qa.debian.org References: <87myb2hevd.fsf at gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87myb2hevd.fsf at gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Message-Id: Sender: Debian QA Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:37:06 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM ca84d2e20f6c0e6d03362c19ef92e936 cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-lw-compat at packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-lw-compat X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:37:07 -0000 Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM ca84d2e20f6c0e6d03362c19ef92e936 cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-lw-compat at packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:36 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:00:27 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPWs-0006uT-T1; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:00:27 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPWs-0003Wr-4g; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:26 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner at common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts at qa.debian.org References: <87skkufz81.fsf at gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87skkufz81.fsf at gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Message-Id: Sender: Debian QA Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:26 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM e9441231365a7d686303e565a2027f95 cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-uffi at packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-uffi X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:27 -0000 Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM e9441231365a7d686303e565a2027f95 cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-uffi at packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:34 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:01:00 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPXP-00071k-R3; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:01:00 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPXP-0003eK-7r; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:59 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner at common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts at qa.debian.org References: <87ocvifz72.fsf at gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87ocvifz72.fsf at gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Message-Id: Sender: Debian QA Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:00:59 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM fcdd132037c4ac7f8248bfabf1a6983f cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-syslog at packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-syslog X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:00 -0000 Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM fcdd132037c4ac7f8248bfabf1a6983f cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-syslog at packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:34 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:01:28 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPXs-00072D-D4; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:01:28 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPXr-0003o1-GV; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:27 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner at common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts at qa.debian.org References: <87iqlqfz6a.fsf at gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87iqlqfz6a.fsf at gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Message-Id: Sender: Debian QA Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:27 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 8b0c4c66321ebba7562e15c2fecc8c48 cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-ubf at packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-ubf X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:28 -0000 Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM 8b0c4c66321ebba7562e15c2fecc8c48 cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-ubf at packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:39 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:01:55 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPYI-00072f-RJ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:01:55 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPYI-0003uQ-7L; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:54 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner at common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts at qa.debian.org References: <87eiwefz5m.fsf at gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <87eiwefz5m.fsf at gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Message-Id: Sender: Debian QA Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:54 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM bb11d9db58aa931f58340de6b48dcc68 cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-typesetting at packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-typesetting X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:01:55 -0000 Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM bb11d9db58aa931f58340de6b48dcc68 cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-typesetting at packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:11:39 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:02:42 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPZ4-00073T-6H; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:02:42 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPZ3-00046K-GU; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:41 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner at common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts at qa.debian.org References: <878wmmfz48.fsf at gismo.pca.it> In-Reply-To: <878wmmfz48.fsf at gismo.pca.it> CC: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Message-Id: Sender: Debian QA Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:41 +0000 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cl-net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM dd224374803296a194e53b9e53cdc4d3 cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-who at packages.qa.debian.org. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [70.103.162.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: [cl-debian] You are no longer subscribed to cl-who X-BeenThere: cl-debian at common-lisp.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Common Lisp on Debian coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:42 -0000 Processing commands for pts at qa.debian.org: > Subject: Re: CONFIRM dd224374803296a194e53b9e53cdc4d3 cl-debian at common-lisp.net has been unsubscribed from cl-who at packages.qa.debian.org. > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:12:54 +0200, > > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > > following mailing list posting: > > > > List: cl-debian at common-lisp.net Five lines without new commands: stopping. 1 command(s) successfully treated. Good bye ! >From bounces at packages.qa.debian.org Mon Mar 30 18:03:07 2009 Received: from master.debian.org ([70.103.162.29]) by common-lisp.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPZS-00073r-Ou; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:03:07 -0400 Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LoPZR-0004Cj-Sf; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:03:05 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) From: owner at packages.qa.debian.org To: cl-debian-owner at common-lisp.net X-Loop: pts at qa.debian.org References: