[cl-debian] Re: clc: what to force into the cache directories and what not
Luca Capello
luca at pca.it
Mon Oct 2 13:22:54 UTC 2006
Hello!
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:59:20 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> I'm preparing a clc version that will undo the
> *redirect-fasl-files-to-cache* 'fix'.
[...]
> So what to do?
>
> - claim that slime/McClim is broken and fix them
> - only redirect to /var/cache for packaged libraries
>
> I'm voting for option 1.
/me too.
SLIME had this problem for a while, but IIRC it was solved with the
patch at [1], which seems to not have been applied yet. We need to
push it upstream again.
I didn't check the Debian cl-mcclim sources yet, so I don't know how
its maintainer solved the problem, thus I cc:ed him :-)
> Oh Luca: #384457 seems still closed to me, not?
I replied to that bug because IMHO it was the one that trigger your
changes to c-l-c. Maybe the best thing is to leave the
*redirect-fasl-files-to-cache* variable (a fix that closes #384457),
but default it to t (the simplest solution for a normal user and for
the CL-Debian packages), documenting its behavior in README.Debian
(and maybe NEWS.Debian, too, thus it appears during upgrades).
Just my 0.02€...
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
Footnotes:
[1] http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/2006-July/005056.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-debian/attachments/20061002/e94ce8bf/attachment.sig>
More information about the Cl-debian
mailing list