[cl-debian] Accepted clisp 1:2.35-4 (source all i386)

Peter Van Eynde cl-debian at pvaneynd.mailworks.org
Sat Oct 22 07:05:23 UTC 2005


Hello people,

On Saturday 22 October 2005 00:32, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> Source: clisp
> Architecture: source all i386

The 'all' for clisp is rather optimistic. If you see on 
http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=clisp
that for alpha, hppa, ia64 and sparc the build fails.

The problems visible in the build logs seem pretty severe:
alpha:

./lisp.run -B . -N locale -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -m 1400KW -x 
"(and (load \"init.lisp\") (sys::%saveinitmem) (ext::exit)) (ext::exit t)"
Cannot map memory to address 0x4000000000000 .
[spvw_mmap.d:359] errno = ENOMEM: Not enough memory.
./lisp.run: Not enough memory for Lisp.

hppa:

./lisp.run -B . -N locale -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -m 1400KW -x 
"(and (load \"init.lisp\") (sys::%saveinitmem) (ext::exit)) (ext::exit t)"
make[1]: *** [interpreted.mem] Segmentation fault

ia64:

./lisp.run -B . -N locale -Efile UTF-8 -Eterminal UTF-8 -norc -m 1400KW -x 
"(and (load \"init.lisp\") (sys::%saveinitmem) (ext::exit)) (ext::exit t)"
Cannot map memory to address 0x4000000000000 .
[spvw_mmap.d:359] errno = EINVAL: Invalid argument.
./lisp.run: Not enough memory for Lisp.

Does anybody have an idea what the cause could be? It does not look like a 
packaging problem, so I'm inclined to say that these architectures are not 
supported anymore by upstream and just drop them.

Comments?

Groetjes, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| 



More information about the Cl-debian mailing list