From blarson at blars.org Sun Jul 3 03:08:39 2005 From: blarson at blars.org (Blars Blarson) Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 20:08:39 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#316685: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] invalid lvalue in assignment Message-ID: <200507030308.j6338daA014626@renig.nat.blars.org> Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.2.0-1 Severity: normal sbcl fails to build on sparc, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. (There are many warnings in the build log before this.) gcc-4.0 -g -Wall -O3 -DSBCL_HOME='"/usr/lib/sbcl/"' -I. -c -o sparc-arch.o sparc-arch.c In file included from sparc-arch.c:23: interr.h:15: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type sparc-arch.c: In function 'arch_get_bad_addr': sparc-arch.c:52: warning: comparison between pointer and integer sparc-arch.c:53: warning: comparison between pointer and integer sparc-arch.c:54: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast sparc-arch.c:55: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast sparc-arch.c: In function 'arch_skip_instruction': sparc-arch.c:89: error: invalid lvalue in assignment sparc-arch.c:90: error: invalid lvalue in assignment sparc-arch.c: In function 'sigemt_handler': sparc-arch.c:311: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value make[1]: *** [sparc-arch.o] Error 1 From rvb at pro-linux.de Sun Jul 3 23:12:04 2005 From: rvb at pro-linux.de (=?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= van Bevern) Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 01:12:04 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] Re: ITP: cl-clg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050703231203.GA13086@negoyl> Hi, Preliminary packages of the cl-clg GTK bindings are available for testing on: deb-src ftp://progn.org/debian unstable main Ren? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pvaneynd at debian.org Sun Jul 3 08:12:34 2005 From: pvaneynd at debian.org (Peter Van Eynde) Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:12:34 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#316685: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] invalid lvalue in assignment In-Reply-To: <200507030308.j6338daA014626@renig.nat.blars.org> References: <200507030308.j6338daA014626@renig.nat.blars.org> Message-ID: <42C79DF2.1020605@debian.org> Blars Blarson schreef: > Package: sbcl > Version: 1:0.9.2.0-1 > Severity: normal > > sbcl fails to build on sparc, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. (There are > many warnings in the build log before this.) > > > gcc-4.0 -g -Wall -O3 -DSBCL_HOME='"/usr/lib/sbcl/"' -I. -c -o sparc-arch.o sparc-arch.c This is strange. It works with me. What is the debian version of gcc and what does 'gcc-4.0 -v' give? Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| From blarson at blars.org Sun Jul 3 13:35:13 2005 From: blarson at blars.org (Blars Blarson) Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 06:35:13 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#316685: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] invalid lvalue in assignment In-Reply-To: <42C79DF2.1020605@debian.org> References: <200507030308.j6338daA014626@renig.nat.blars.org> <42C79DF2.1020605@debian.org> Message-ID: <20050703133513.GA28088@blars.org> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 10:12:34AM +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > This is strange. It works with me. What is the debian version of gcc and > what does 'gcc-4.0 -v' give? Script started on Sun Jul 3 06:27:06 2005 ]0;root at sundry: /home/blarson/srcsundry:/home/blarson/src# pbuilder login W: /root/.pbuilderrc does not exist Building the build Environment -> extracting base tarball [/var/cache/pbuilder/base.tgz] -> creating local configuration -> copying local configuration -> mounting /proc filesystem -> mounting /dev/pts filesystem -> policy-rc.d already exists Obtaining the cached apt archive contents find: warning: you have specified the -maxdepth option after a non-option argument -name, but options are not positional (-maxdepth affects tests specified before it as well as those specified after it). Please specify options before other arguments. -> entering the shell File extracted to: /var/cache/pbuilder/build//2537 ]0;root at sundry: /sundry:/# apt-get install gcc-4.0 Reading package lists... 0% Reading package lists... 100% Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... 0% Building dependency tree... 0% Building dependency tree... 50% Building dependency tree... 50% Building dependency tree... 69% Building dependency tree... 94% Building dependency tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: cpp-4.0 gcc-4.0-base Suggested packages: gcc-4.0-locales gcc-4.0-doc Recommended packages: libmudflap0-dev The following NEW packages will be installed: cpp-4.0 gcc-4.0 gcc-4.0-base 0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/2463kB of archives. After unpacking 5444kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! gcc-4.0-base cpp-4.0 gcc-4.0 Install these packages without verification [y/N]? y debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed Selecting previously deselected package gcc-4.0-base. (Reading database ... 8782 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gcc-4.0-base (from .../gcc-4.0-base_4.0.0-9_sparc.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package cpp-4.0. Unpacking cpp-4.0 (from .../cpp-4.0_4.0.0-9_sparc.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gcc-4.0. Unpacking gcc-4.0 (from .../gcc-4.0_4.0.0-9_sparc.deb) ... Setting up gcc-4.0-base (4.0.0-9) ... Setting up cpp-4.0 (4.0.0-9) ... Setting up gcc-4.0 (4.0.0-9) ... ]0;root at sundry: /sundry:/# gcc  -4.0 -v Using built-in specs. Target: sparc-linux Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --program-suffix=-4.0 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-mpfr --disable-werror --with-cpu=v7 --enable-checking=release sparc-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.1 20050522 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.0-8) ]0;root at sundry: /sundry:/# gcc   dpkg -l gcc Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-==============-==============-============================================ ii gcc 3.3.6-1 The GNU C compiler ]0;root at sundry: /sundry:/# exit Copying back the cached apt archive contents find: warning: you have specified the -maxdepth option after a non-option argument -name, but options are not positional (-maxdepth affects tests specified before it as well as those specified after it). Please specify options before other arguments. -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem -> unmounting proc filesystem -> cleaning the build env -> removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//2537 and its subdirectories find: warning: you have specified the -xdev option after a non-option argument (, but options are not positional (-xdev affects tests specified before it as well as those specified after it). Please specify options before other arguments. find: warning: you have specified the -xdev option after a non-option argument -type, but options are not positional (-xdev affects tests specified before it as well as those specified after it). Please specify options before other arguments. find: warning: you have specified the -depth option after a non-option argument -type, but options are not positional (-depth affects tests specified before it as well as those specified after it). Please specify options before other arguments. ]0;root at sundry: /home/blarson/srcsundry:/home/blarson/src# exit Script done on Sun Jul 3 06:32:30 2005 -- Blars Blarson blarson at blars.org http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. From pvaneynd at debian.org Tue Jul 5 11:17:11 2005 From: pvaneynd at debian.org (Peter Van Eynde) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 07:17:11 -0400 Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted cmucl 19b-release-20050628-3 (i386 source all) Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 07:51:58 +0200 Source: cmucl Binary: cmucl cmucl-source cmucl-clm cmucl-docs Architecture: source all i386 Version: 19b-release-20050628-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde Description: cmucl - The CMUCL lisp compiler and development system cmucl-clm - The Motif interface for CMUCL cmucl-docs - The CMUCL documentation cmucl-source - The CMUCL lisp sources Changes: cmucl (19b-release-20050628-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Removed old CVS build script * Updated policy version * Added watch file * Moved to darcs-buildpackage * Updated banner Files: 356f880a3ac0a80926a37704b431a86a 739 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628-3.dsc 7f60df0828a48106833d209a85ae739f 1504022 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628-3.diff.gz 7975d8aac2e9ab21888288c089065e66 10534228 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628-3_i386.deb 3d4542b02ad38d5c10307b88078afc8d 651212 devel optional cmucl-clm_19b-release-20050628-3_i386.deb 0131eaa592d28e67fffa68b8b47ff93d 2277428 doc optional cmucl-docs_19b-release-20050628-3_all.deb fadca2900d4149fa11f35173bd732e0a 5166186 devel optional cmucl-source_19b-release-20050628-3_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCymIh11ldN0tyliURArUoAJoDa0iw/BaTbEds/7xBEeSHGxc+mACgwVIi ge5+5uarKqkWjranJBy7FKM= =+Fbk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: cmucl-clm_19b-release-20050628-3_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl-clm_19b-release-20050628-3_i386.deb cmucl-docs_19b-release-20050628-3_all.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl-docs_19b-release-20050628-3_all.deb cmucl-source_19b-release-20050628-3_all.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl-source_19b-release-20050628-3_all.deb cmucl_19b-release-20050628-3.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl_19b-release-20050628-3.diff.gz cmucl_19b-release-20050628-3.dsc to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl_19b-release-20050628-3.dsc cmucl_19b-release-20050628-3_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl_19b-release-20050628-3_i386.deb From installer at ftp-master.debian.org Tue Jul 5 11:32:33 2005 From: installer at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 07:32:33 -0400 Subject: [cl-debian] sbcl_0.9.2.0-2_i386.changes REJECTED Message-ID: Rejected: sbcl_0.9.2.0-2.dsc refers to sbcl_0.9.2.0.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. From installer at ftp-master.debian.org Tue Jul 5 12:06:37 2005 From: installer at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 08:06:37 -0400 Subject: [cl-debian] sbcl_0.9.2.0-2_i386.changes REJECTED Message-ID: Rejected: sbcl_0.9.2.0-2.dsc refers to sbcl_0.9.2.0.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. From installer at ftp-master.debian.org Tue Jul 5 14:02:56 2005 From: installer at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 10:02:56 -0400 Subject: [cl-debian] sbcl_0.9.2.0-3_i386.changes REJECTED Message-ID: Rejected: sbcl_0.9.2.0-3.dsc refers to sbcl_0.9.2.0.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the pool. === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. From pvaneynd at debian.org Tue Jul 5 14:47:19 2005 From: pvaneynd at debian.org (Peter Van Eynde) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 10:47:19 -0400 Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted sbcl 1:0.9.2.0-3 (i386 source all) Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:43:54 +0200 Source: sbcl Binary: sbcl sbcl-common Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1:0.9.2.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde Description: sbcl - A development environment for Common Lisp sbcl-common - Architecture independent files for SBCL Changes: sbcl (1:0.9.2.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * Force a source upload as the -1 version was native by accident. Files: 3f5b1c2e8adddc089055bbbac4f442fe 678 devel optional sbcl_0.9.2.0-3.dsc 1ec1fc7855930379413ec4c30a0d3f48 3269438 devel optional sbcl_0.9.2.0.orig.tar.gz bec58e9888918cb84a2671eca4c27a69 22548 devel optional sbcl_0.9.2.0-3.diff.gz 75cf5b74bb4890d66382d48b4a8be992 3406170 devel optional sbcl-common_0.9.2.0-3_all.deb 4318be6c2767feef8beed805a007a409 8423754 devel optional sbcl_0.9.2.0-3_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCypSw11ldN0tyliURAi8mAKDAdepPCV3IcX9IqmJ/M1HWfyQxnACfTrbc HUFUtvYLhYHCHekLYzvQ97c= =ZkOB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: sbcl-common_0.9.2.0-3_all.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl-common_0.9.2.0-3_all.deb sbcl_0.9.2.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.2.0-3.diff.gz sbcl_0.9.2.0-3.dsc to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.2.0-3.dsc sbcl_0.9.2.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.2.0-3_i386.deb sbcl_0.9.2.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.2.0.orig.tar.gz From tcross at rapttech.com.au Tue Jul 5 09:03:09 2005 From: tcross at rapttech.com.au (Tim Cross) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 19:03:09 +1000 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#316974: cmucl: Missing release info on changes Message-ID: Package: cmucl Version: 19b-pre1-20050614-1 Severity: minor The APROPOS and APROPOS-LIST functions have been changed in CMUCL version 19b to only accept 2 parameters rather than the 3 it previously accepted. This change does not appear to be mentioned in either the release-notes or changelog. However, it is mentioned in the upstream release, in the file release-19b.txt (which does not appear to be in the Debian package). Just thought I'd mention this as the upgrade did break my installation of SLIME, which had the 3 parameter call to APROPOS-LIST. The new versions of APROPOS and APROPOS-LIST bring CMUCL into compliance with the hyperspec. regards, Tim -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages cmucl depends on: ii common-lisp-controller 4.15 This is a Common Lisp source and c ii debconf 1.4.51 Debian configuration management sy -- debconf information: cmucl/upgradeproblems: * cmucl/auto-build: Yes From rvb at pro-linux.de Tue Jul 5 10:13:32 2005 From: rvb at pro-linux.de (=?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= van Bevern) Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 12:13:32 +0200 Subject: Bug#316959: [cl-debian] Bug#316959: cmucl: lisp-dist.core not found, site-init not found, broken starup, In-Reply-To: <200506271913.j5RJDFR0019016@sol8.hunter> References: <200506271913.j5RJDFR0019016@sol8.hunter> Message-ID: <20050705101331.GA8634@negoyl> On 27.06.05, John D. Hendrickson wrote: Hello, > Package: cmucl > Version: 18e-10 The recent Debian stable features CMU Common Lisp 19a, also the common-lisp-controller in use by you (3.88) is outdated and you should consider upgrading. :) > * cmucl binary names "lisp.core" using strings(1) but you distribute the > file as lisp-dist.core. This is correct. lisp-dist.core is the origininally-built core image. On installation, the common-lisp-controller starts CMUCL with this image, adds its own definitions plus the ASDF ones and dumps a new image as lisp.core, so that ASDF and the CLC are available at cmucl startup. So lisp.core is created by the installation process. For details, investigate /usr/share/doc/common-lisp-controller/DESIGN.txt > 2) what is "asdf" and why isn't it part of the origional distribution? ASDF is "Another System Definition Facility", more information is at http://www.cliki.net/asdf ... the common-lisp-controller should integrate ASDF and itself into the CMUCL core image at installation. > 3) why does cmucl_19a-release-20040728-11.diff include diffs to lisp.core I can't find diffs to lisp.core in there. > I know I'd *really* like to use readline - which is why I downloaded > cmulc from www.cons.org/cmucl Have you tried rlwrap already? :) It does not give you completion of lisp symbols but allows for a history and command line editing. Just call it as "rlwrap cmucl". You could also try Slime, a development environment for Common Lisp, found there http://pvaneynd.blogspot.com/2005/06/new-common-lisp-based-repositories.html for Debian and there http://freshmeat.net/redir/slime/53825/url_homepage/slime Do the problems occur with recent packages as well? Does the installation script report any errors, is it run at all? Ren? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pvaneynd at debian.org Tue Jul 5 10:06:00 2005 From: pvaneynd at debian.org (Peter Van Eynde) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:06:00 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#316959: cmucl: lisp-dist.core not found, site-init not found, broken starup, In-Reply-To: <200506271913.j5RJDFR0019016@sol8.hunter> References: <200506271913.j5RJDFR0019016@sol8.hunter> Message-ID: <42CA5B88.4060808@debian.org> John D. Hendrickson schreef: > * cmucl binary names "lisp.core" using strings(1) but you distribute the > file as lisp-dist.core. This is intentional: when the package installs it will compile and then load common-lisp-controller and save a new image as lisp.core. > * only platform is i386 I only have a i386 to build the package on. In future there is a possibility of having other architectures, but for 90% of the users out there x86 is the only architecture that matters. If you want cross-architecture development, please use sbcl. > * startup shows compile corruption due to compiling phase sorry? Could you give an example? > * site-init doesn't seem to be the origional and look like it loads > * itself recursively (that's what happened to me) This should not happen, could you give a typescript > Are my problems that I installed this from Sarge BEFORE it became > official? Because it seems by package file list things would be > more or less the same. The differences between the pre versions and the final 19b seem slight. But I suspect a few of your problems are because you have a mixed non-debian/debian cmucl installation. > 1) I see quite allot of diffs of clisp to the networking and password section. > Why does cmucl need this? clisp? > 2) what is "asdf" and why isn't it part of the origional distribution? Please see http://www.cliki.net/asdf > 3) why does > > cmucl_19a-release-20040728-11.diff > > Include diffs to > > lisp.core > > When lisp.core is cmucl binary that has to be built - a large part of > lisp - which - I might add - makes lisp impossible to use if not built > with lisp(1) binary? It the diff contains a lisp.core patch then this is an error of packaging. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jul 5 19:03:24 2005 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:03:24 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: merging 316958 316959 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > merge 316958 316959 Bug#316958: cmucl: Retracting one statment in last report: I had a wrong arg. Bug#316959: cmucl: lisp-dist.core not found, site-init not found, broken starup, Merged 316958 316959. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jul 5 19:04:11 2005 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:04:11 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#316959: marked as done (cmucl: lisp-dist.core not found, site-init not found, broken starup,) In-Reply-To: <42CA69B9.80504@debian.org> References: <42CA69B9.80504@debian.org> <200506271913.j5RJDFR0019016@sol8.hunter> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2005 13:06:33 +0200 with message-id <42CA69B9.80504 at debian.org> and subject line Bug#316959: cmucl: lisp-dist.core not found, site-init not found, broken starup, has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2005 07:40:06 +0000 >From johndhendrickson22124 at yahoo.com Tue Jul 05 00:40:06 2005 Return-path: Received: from lakermmtao09.cox.net [68.230.240.30] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dpi2H-0003hA-00; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 00:40:05 -0700 Received: from borphee.com ([70.187.205.235]) by lakermmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050705073933.IYNP6804.lakermmtao09.cox.net at borphee.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 03:39:33 -0400 Received: from sol8.hunter (sol8.hunter [192.168.3.22]) by borphee.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j657dX8J017974; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 03:39:34 -0400 Received: from sol8.hunter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sol8.hunter (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5RJDF1e019017; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:13:15 -0400 Received: (from jdh at localhost) by sol8.hunter (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id j5RJDFR0019016; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:13:15 -0400 Message-Id: <200506271913.j5RJDFR0019016 at sol8.hunter> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "John D. Hendrickson" To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: cmucl: lisp-dist.core not found, site-init not found, broken starup, X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:13:15 -0400 X-BadReturnPath: jdh at sol8.hunter rewritten as johndhendrickson22124 at yahoo.com using "From" header Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cmucl Version: 18e-10 Severity: normal I consider cmucl to be the *best* of gcl and clisp because of it's stability. However. * cmucl binary names "lisp.core" using strings(1) but you distribute the file as lisp-dist.core. * only platform is i386 * startup shows compile corruption due to compiling phase * site-init doesn't seem to be the origional and look like it loads * itself recursively (that's what happened to me) $ /usr/bin/lisp -load /usr/lib/cmucl/lisp-dist.core ; Loading #p"/mnt/hda5/usr/lib/cmucl/lisp-dist.core". Error in KERNEL::UNBOUND-SYMBOL-ERROR-HANDLER: the variable |EROCL?F??4??HZ? | is unbound. Restarts: 0: [CONTINUE] Return NIL from load of "/usr/lib/cmucl/lisp-dist.core". 1: [ABORT ] Skip remaining initializations. Debug (type H for help) (EVAL |EROCL?F??4??HZ? |) Source: Error finding source: Error in function DEBUG::GET-FILE-TOP-LEVEL-FORM: Source file no longer exists: target:code/eval.lisp. 0] ed Error in KERNEL::UNDEFINED-SYMBOL-ERROR-HANDLER: the function HEMLOCK::TS-STREAM-P is undefined. Error flushed ... I compiled cmucl myself from the cmucl website and here's what I see when I run lisp(1): ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////// CMU Common Lisp 19a, running on sol8 With core: /mnt/hda5/usr/local/lib/cmucl/lib/lisp.core Dumped on: Wed, 2004-07-28 12:51:48-04:00 on lorien See for support information. Loaded subsystems: Python 1.1, target Intel x86 CLOS based on Gerd's PCL 2004/04/14 03:32:47 * ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////// I'll add that while I have good results compiling the bin and some tools that my build of extra libs stops on /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a (becuase I compiled my own Motif and have a mix of libs I have to fix). ..................................... Are my problems that I installed this from Sarge BEFORE it became official? Because it seems by package file list things would be more or less the same. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// A couple last things: 1) I see quite allot of diffs of clisp to the networking and password section. Why does cmucl need this? 2) what is "asdf" and why isn't it part of the origional distribution? 3) why does cmucl_19a-release-20040728-11.diff Include diffs to lisp.core When lisp.core is cmucl binary that has to be built - a large part of lisp - which - I might add - makes lisp impossible to use if not built with lisp(1) binary? /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Anyway. It appears you've done allot of work and I hope you get your problems done soon. I know I'd *really* like to use readline - which is why I downloaded cmulc from www.cons.org/cmucl -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages cmucl depends on: ii common-lisp-controller 3.88 This is a Common Lisp source and c ii debconf 1.4.25 Debian configuration management sy -- debconf information: cmucl/upgradeproblems: * cmucl/auto-build: Yes --------------------------------------- Received: (at 316959-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2005 11:06:36 +0000 >From pvaneynd at debian.org Tue Jul 05 04:06:36 2005 Return-path: Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DplG8-0000eY-00; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 04:06:36 -0700 Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15580CB649C for <316959-done at bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 07:06:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: MP9YqvOebZS7EKTbTmXbaP1+k4hUXAPnwCF51Axi8BHb 1120561594 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (blueice4n1.uk.ibm.com [195.212.29.91]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8341B56F785 for <316959-done at bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 07:06:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42CA69B9.80504 at debian.org> Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 13:06:33 +0200 From: Peter Van Eynde User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: nl-NL, nl, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 316959-done at bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#316959: cmucl: lisp-dist.core not found, site-init not found, broken starup, References: <200506271913.j5RJDFR0019016 at sol8.hunter> In-Reply-To: <200506271913.j5RJDFR0019016 at sol8.hunter> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 316959-done at bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Bug caused by manual instalation of cmucl binaries. Groetjes, Peter Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jul 5 19:04:12 2005 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 12:04:12 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#316958: marked as done (cmucl: Retracting one statment in last report: I had a wrong arg.) In-Reply-To: <42CA69B9.80504@debian.org> References: <42CA69B9.80504@debian.org> <200506280546.j5S5kHpi000310@sol8.hunter> Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2005 13:06:33 +0200 with message-id <42CA69B9.80504 at debian.org> and subject line Bug#316959: cmucl: lisp-dist.core not found, site-init not found, broken starup, has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2005 07:40:06 +0000 >From johndhendrickson22124 at yahoo.com Tue Jul 05 00:40:05 2005 Return-path: Received: from lakermmtao08.cox.net [68.230.240.31] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dpi2H-0003gy-00; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 00:40:05 -0700 Received: from borphee.com ([70.187.205.235]) by lakermmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050705073933.IEVW18139.lakermmtao08.cox.net at borphee.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 03:39:33 -0400 Received: from sol8.hunter (sol8.hunter [192.168.3.22]) by borphee.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j657dX8F017974; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 03:39:33 -0400 Received: from sol8.hunter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sol8.hunter (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5S5kH1e000311; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:46:17 -0400 Received: (from jdh at localhost) by sol8.hunter (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id j5S5kHpi000310; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:46:17 -0400 Message-Id: <200506280546.j5S5kHpi000310 at sol8.hunter> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "John D. Hendrickson" To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: cmucl: Retracting one statment in last report: I had a wrong arg. X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:46:17 -0400 X-BadReturnPath: jdh at sol8.hunter rewritten as johndhendrickson22124 at yahoo.com using "From" header Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cmucl Version: 18e-10 Severity: normal In the last report I erroneously stated when starting cmucl there were errors shown (example show before below). lisp -load /usr/lib/cmucl/lisp-dist.core # ... is *wrong* lisp -core /usr/lib/cmucl/lisp-dist.core # ... is "right" and does work However - I still have the problem (as meantioned last time) that lisp-dist.core can't be found by lisp(1) and lisp(1) only has the "lisp.core" string, etc... CMU Common Lisp L19a, running on sol8 With core: /mnt/hda4/hog-hda5/tmp/tmp4/target/lisp/lisp.core Dumped on: Mon, 2005-06-27 21:52:54-04:00 on sol8 See for support information. Loaded subsystems: Python 1.1, target Intel x86 CLOS based on Gerd's PCL 2004/04/14 03:32:47 * -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages cmucl depends on: ii common-lisp-controller 3.88 This is a Common Lisp source and c ii debconf 1.4.25 Debian configuration management sy -- debconf information: cmucl/upgradeproblems: * cmucl/auto-build: Yes --------------------------------------- Received: (at 316959-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2005 11:06:36 +0000 >From pvaneynd at debian.org Tue Jul 05 04:06:36 2005 Return-path: Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DplG8-0000eY-00; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 04:06:36 -0700 Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15580CB649C for <316959-done at bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 07:06:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: MP9YqvOebZS7EKTbTmXbaP1+k4hUXAPnwCF51Axi8BHb 1120561594 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (blueice4n1.uk.ibm.com [195.212.29.91]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8341B56F785 for <316959-done at bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 07:06:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42CA69B9.80504 at debian.org> Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 13:06:33 +0200 From: Peter Van Eynde User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: nl-NL, nl, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 316959-done at bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#316959: cmucl: lisp-dist.core not found, site-init not found, broken starup, References: <200506271913.j5RJDFR0019016 at sol8.hunter> In-Reply-To: <200506271913.j5RJDFR0019016 at sol8.hunter> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: 316959-done at bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Bug caused by manual instalation of cmucl binaries. Groetjes, Peter Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| From rvb at pro-linux.de Tue Jul 5 20:01:30 2005 From: rvb at pro-linux.de (=?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= van Bevern) Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:01:30 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] AspectL relicensed Message-ID: <20050705200129.GA7129@negoyl> Hi, AspectL has now been relicensed and can go to Debian main. The new packages are available at deb-src ftp://progn.org/debian unstable main Peter, could you please upload cl-aspectl to the archive along with the updated cl-screen-sbcl for Debian's slang2 transition? :) Ren? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pvaneynd at debian.org Tue Jul 5 20:47:14 2005 From: pvaneynd at debian.org (Peter Van Eynde) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:47:14 -0400 Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted cmucl 19b-release-20050628-4 (i386 source all) Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 20:23:03 +0200 Source: cmucl Binary: cmucl cmucl-source cmucl-clm cmucl-docs Architecture: source all i386 Version: 19b-release-20050628-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde Description: cmucl - The CMUCL lisp compiler and development system cmucl-clm - The Motif interface for CMUCL cmucl-docs - The CMUCL documentation cmucl-source - The CMUCL lisp sources Closes: 316974 Changes: cmucl (19b-release-20050628-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Now include 19b release notes instead of 19a! Closes: #316974 Files: 6daf0a206ed9232776a0b5947d2db51a 739 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.dsc 363a959fd8080ecabc8372463d485134 4644271 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628.orig.tar.gz b1b1ef79c04bf4e8b00c5f2e4dd4af9f 1504059 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.diff.gz 96551e958f160b26460b7bde155accfe 10535032 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb 8a9ba109b54740e9ca418de13449ccea 651332 devel optional cmucl-clm_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb cc72a32833c63c24369c6cceef32b859 2276960 doc optional cmucl-docs_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb 059144431746853e459987d65d465b58 5166152 devel optional cmucl-source_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCyuSr11ldN0tyliURAn+zAJwPXa67eaOnheHVDSGhhhXAQKEpHgCfcSBt 2AdNoOzzWjEZRq/n6W7G8QY= =NjPZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: cmucl-clm_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl-clm_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb cmucl-docs_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl-docs_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb cmucl-source_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl-source_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.diff.gz cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.dsc to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.dsc cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb From installer at ftp-master.debian.org Tue Jul 5 21:02:03 2005 From: installer at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Installer) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:02:03 -0400 Subject: [cl-debian] cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3_i386.changes REJECTED Message-ID: Rejected: md5sum for /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/c/cl-screen-sbcl/cl-screen-sbcl_1.0.orig.tar.gz doesn't match cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.dsc. Rejected: size for /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/c/cl-screen-sbcl/cl-screen-sbcl_1.0.orig.tar.gz doesn't match cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.dsc. Rejected: 'dpkg-source -x' failed for cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.dsc [return code: 65280]. [dpkg-source output:] dpkg-source: error: file cl-screen-sbcl_1.0.orig.tar.gz has size 10213 instead of expected 10794 === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. From cl-debian at pvaneynd.mailworks.org Tue Jul 5 21:22:44 2005 From: cl-debian at pvaneynd.mailworks.org (Peter Van Eynde) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 23:22:44 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3_i386.changes REJECTED In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <42CAFA24.4090004@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Debian Installer schreef: > Rejected: md5sum for /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/c/cl-screen-sbcl/cl-screen-sbcl_1.0.orig.tar.gz doesn't match cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.dsc. > Rejected: size for /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/c/cl-screen-sbcl/cl-screen-sbcl_1.0.orig.tar.gz doesn't match cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.dsc. > Rejected: 'dpkg-source -x' failed for cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.dsc [return code: 65280]. > [dpkg-source output:] dpkg-source: error: file cl-screen-sbcl_1.0.orig.tar.gz has size 10213 instead of expected 10794 My mistake. The darcs-buildpackage recreated the .orig.tar.gz file :-(. Uploading a new version now... Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| From rvb at pro-linux.de Tue Jul 5 21:30:38 2005 From: rvb at pro-linux.de (=?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= van Bevern) Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 23:30:38 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3_i386.changes REJECTED In-Reply-To: <42CAFA24.4090004@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> References: <42CAFA24.4090004@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Message-ID: <20050705213037.GC13628@negoyl> On 5.07.05, Peter Van Eynde wrote: Hi Peter, > My mistake. The darcs-buildpackage recreated the .orig.tar.gz file :-(. As you know, I've also used darcs-buildpackage for some time. Although darcs is very nice to keep ones debian packages in, darcs-buildpackage is not quite mature yet, as it seems. As you mentioned, it doesn't do epochs well, but the worst: it drops permissions when creating the orig.tar.gz. I have gone over to only maintain my debian/ directories in Darcs and to make modifications to the upstream source using DPatch or CDBS' simple-patchsys. By the way, where are your repositories? :) Ren? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: not available URL: From owner at bugs.debian.org Tue Jul 5 23:50:40 2005 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:50:40 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#316974: marked as done (cmucl: Missing release info on changes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Your message dated Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:47:14 -0400 with message-id and subject line Bug#316974: fixed in cmucl 19b-release-20050628-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2005 09:03:18 +0000 >From tcross at rapttech.com.au Tue Jul 05 02:03:18 2005 Return-path: Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DpjKo-0004Qr-00; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 02:03:18 -0700 Received: from tiger.rapttech.com.au (ppp1-192.lns1.syd3.internode.on.net [59.167.1.192]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6593ApL032404 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:33:15 +0930 (CST) Received: from tcross by tiger.rapttech.com.au with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DpjKf-0001ap-Jz for maintonly at bugs.debian.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 19:03:09 +1000 To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: cmucl: Missing release info on changes X-Debbugs-CC: Tim Cross Message-Id: From: Tim Cross Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 19:03:09 +1000 Delivered-To: maintonly at bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cmucl Version: 19b-pre1-20050614-1 Severity: minor The APROPOS and APROPOS-LIST functions have been changed in CMUCL version 19b to only accept 2 parameters rather than the 3 it previously accepted. This change does not appear to be mentioned in either the release-notes or changelog. However, it is mentioned in the upstream release, in the file release-19b.txt (which does not appear to be in the Debian package). Just thought I'd mention this as the upgrade did break my installation of SLIME, which had the 3 parameter call to APROPOS-LIST. The new versions of APROPOS and APROPOS-LIST bring CMUCL into compliance with the hyperspec. regards, Tim -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages cmucl depends on: ii common-lisp-controller 4.15 This is a Common Lisp source and c ii debconf 1.4.51 Debian configuration management sy -- debconf information: cmucl/upgradeproblems: * cmucl/auto-build: Yes --------------------------------------- Received: (at 316974-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2005 20:53:05 +0000 >From katie at ftp-master.debian.org Tue Jul 05 13:53:05 2005 Return-path: Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DpuPg-00035b-00; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 13:53:04 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DpuK2-0004un-00; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:47:14 -0400 From: Peter Van Eynde To: 316974-close at bugs.debian.org X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#316974: fixed in cmucl 19b-release-20050628-4 Message-Id: Sender: Archive Administrator Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:47:14 -0400 Delivered-To: 316974-close at bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: cmucl Source-Version: 19b-release-20050628-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cmucl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cmucl-clm_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl-clm_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb cmucl-docs_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl-docs_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb cmucl-source_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl-source_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.diff.gz cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.dsc to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.dsc cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 316974 at bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Van Eynde (supplier of updated cmucl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster at debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 20:23:03 +0200 Source: cmucl Binary: cmucl cmucl-source cmucl-clm cmucl-docs Architecture: source all i386 Version: 19b-release-20050628-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde Description: cmucl - The CMUCL lisp compiler and development system cmucl-clm - The Motif interface for CMUCL cmucl-docs - The CMUCL documentation cmucl-source - The CMUCL lisp sources Closes: 316974 Changes: cmucl (19b-release-20050628-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Now include 19b release notes instead of 19a! Closes: #316974 Files: 6daf0a206ed9232776a0b5947d2db51a 739 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.dsc 363a959fd8080ecabc8372463d485134 4644271 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628.orig.tar.gz b1b1ef79c04bf4e8b00c5f2e4dd4af9f 1504059 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4.diff.gz 96551e958f160b26460b7bde155accfe 10535032 devel optional cmucl_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb 8a9ba109b54740e9ca418de13449ccea 651332 devel optional cmucl-clm_19b-release-20050628-4_i386.deb cc72a32833c63c24369c6cceef32b859 2276960 doc optional cmucl-docs_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb 059144431746853e459987d65d465b58 5166152 devel optional cmucl-source_19b-release-20050628-4_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCyuSr11ldN0tyliURAn+zAJwPXa67eaOnheHVDSGhhhXAQKEpHgCfcSBt 2AdNoOzzWjEZRq/n6W7G8QY= =NjPZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From rvb at pro-linux.de Wed Jul 6 04:02:03 2005 From: rvb at pro-linux.de (=?utf-8?q?Ren=C3=A9_van_Bevern?=) Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 00:02:03 -0400 Subject: [cl-debian] Accepted cl-screen-sbcl 1.0-3 (all source) Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:11:45 +0200 Source: cl-screen-sbcl Binary: cl-screen-sbcl Architecture: source all Version: 1.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ren?? van Bevern Changed-By: Ren?? van Bevern Description: cl-screen-sbcl - SLang interface for Steel Bank Common Lisp Changes: cl-screen-sbcl (1.0-3) unstable; urgency=low . * build against libslang2 for the slang2-transition * package conforms to Debian policy 3.6.2.1 Files: 68fdfa1d6e6b48e6a599550164d04741 608 devel optional cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.dsc 99fb59584a28e646c0c8f89de3be7639 10213 devel optional cl-screen-sbcl_1.0.orig.tar.gz 87105f89dd66a613e19329e41878eacd 3084 devel optional cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.diff.gz 970b7bf7cdee80d18530c02e88a881de 74082 devel optional cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCyvov11ldN0tyliURAuaZAJsE4SSaDnKjM2kGYb/zcZCdnnCe3wCeMBRK Buima9aLi2pmGAs/29sCSDs= =J6de -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Accepted: cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cl-screen-sbcl/cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.diff.gz cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.dsc to pool/main/c/cl-screen-sbcl/cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3.dsc cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3_all.deb to pool/main/c/cl-screen-sbcl/cl-screen-sbcl_1.0-3_all.deb From emres at bilgi.edu.tr Sat Jul 9 14:17:43 2005 From: emres at bilgi.edu.tr (Emre Sevinc) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 17:17:43 +0300 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#317533: sbcl install does not complete (with CPU at %99) Message-ID: <9940BA60F8E6414F9F0307DD411BCF6906BF9248@ex2k.bilgi.networks> Package: sbcl version: 0.9.2.0 When I try to install the latest version of SBCL on my Debian (unstable) it comes to a step in which it waits forever (I had to C-c it after about 15 minutes) and the CPU is at %99. Here's what I did: # apt-get install sbcl Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Suggested packages: ilisp The following packages will be upgraded: sbcl 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 600 not upgraded. Need to get 8424kB of archives. After unpacking 631kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 ftp://ftp.debian.org unstable/main sbcl 1:0.9.2.0-3 [8424kB] Fetched 8424kB in 5m10s (27.2kB/s) (Reading database ... 91643 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace sbcl 1:0.8.20.5-2 (using .../sbcl_1%3a0.9.2.0-3_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement sbcl ... Setting up sbcl (0.9.2.0-3) ... /usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/sbcl.sh loading and dumping clc. After printing the last line above, the CPU is stuck at %99 and it goes on and on... Here are details of my system: $ uname -a Linux debian 2.4.18 #1 Mon Mar 24 02:00:40 EET 2003 i686 GNU/Linux And my locale info (if this is relavant): LC_NUMERIC=C LC_MESSAGES=C LC_TIME=C LANG=tr_TR -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kevin at rosenberg.net Sat Jul 9 15:46:01 2005 From: kevin at rosenberg.net (Kevin Rosenberg) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 09:46:01 -0600 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#317533: sbcl install does not complete (with CPU at %99) In-Reply-To: <9940BA60F8E6414F9F0307DD411BCF6906BF9248@ex2k.bilgi.networks> References: <9940BA60F8E6414F9F0307DD411BCF6906BF9248@ex2k.bilgi.networks> Message-ID: <20050709154601.GB26606@rosenberg.net> Emre Sevinc wrote: > $ uname -a > Linux debian 2.4.18 #1 Mon Mar 24 02:00:40 EET 2003 i686 GNU/Linux That is likely the issue. I get the same with kernel 2.4. A work-around that I've used: reboot into 2.6 and complete the installation. Then, you can go back to 2.4 if you wish and run sbcl. Kevin From emres at bilgi.edu.tr Sat Jul 9 17:29:30 2005 From: emres at bilgi.edu.tr (Emre Sevinc) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 20:29:30 +0300 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#317533: sbcl install does not complete (with CPUat %99) Message-ID: <9940BA60F8E6414F9F0307DD411BCF6906BF924D@ex2k.bilgi.networks> -----Original Message----- From: cl-debian-bounces at common-lisp.net on behalf of Kevin Rosenberg Sent: Sat 7/9/2005 6:46 PM To: Common Lisp on Debian coordination Subject: Re: [cl-debian] Bug#317533: sbcl install does not complete (with CPUat %99) >Emre Sevinc wrote: >> $ uname -a >> Linux debian 2.4.18 #1 Mon Mar 24 02:00:40 EET 2003 i686 GNU/Linux >That is likely the issue. I get the same with kernel 2.4. A >work-around that I've used: reboot into 2.6 and complete the >installation. Then, you can go back to 2.4 if you wish and run sbcl. Well, actually I prefer to wait until this bug is fixed (I'm writing on the premise that the bug belongs to SBCL not the Linux 2.4). In the meantime, I installed SBCL 0.8.16 from the testing Debian repository which installed and worked fine. I did not intend to upgrade to the latest SBCL had it not produce an error regarding with-output-to-string. The details are at: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_frm/thread/a87893925ce0a19a/29f5bbdc04678248 I think I'll prefer waiting, since this is a major issue, hoping the fix is going to come very soon. Regards, Emre -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rvb at pro-linux.de Sat Jul 9 17:54:14 2005 From: rvb at pro-linux.de (=?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= van Bevern) Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 19:54:14 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] RFC: [DRAFT] Debian CL-Policy Message-ID: <20050709175413.GC8701@negoyl> Hi, there is the DESIGN.txt from common-lisp-controller and some documents describing Common Lisp packaging for Debian in the CLiki, but no central document. So I have started drafting something like a Common Lisp in Debian Policy [1], that describes the current package practises for CL and also sets some requirements for CL-packages in Debian. Not all packages comply with that document yet, cmucl for example does not provide a remove-clc in its cmucl.sh script, which I allowed myself to set as a requirement, because it is just "clean" to have it as a counterpart of to the required install-clc. However, once (and if) this document goes beyond its draft state, I'd of course come up with patches also. I'd like others to comment on this packaging manual. However: When writing this, I noticed that clc-{un,}register-user-package in /usr/sbin does not conform to the FHS. These should eventually be placed in /usr/bin, as they are of use for every regular user, not just for the system administrator. Ren? [1] ftp://progn.org/pub/papers/cl-policy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: not available URL: From paduch at mail.ru Sun Jul 10 06:29:24 2005 From: paduch at mail.ru (Dmitriyi Paduchikh) Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:29:24 +0600 Subject: [cl-debian] Re: Bug#317533: sbcl install does not complete (with CPUat %99) In-Reply-To: <9940BA60F8E6414F9F0307DD411BCF6906BF924D@ex2k.bilgi.networks> (Emre Sevinc's message of "Sat, 9 Jul 2005 20:29:30 +0300") References: <9940BA60F8E6414F9F0307DD411BCF6906BF924D@ex2k.bilgi.networks> Message-ID: <87eka7kwcb.fsf@paduch.mail.ru> Emre Sevinc writes: [...] > Well, actually I prefer to wait until this bug is fixed > (I'm writing on the premise that the bug belongs to SBCL > not the Linux 2.4). You may try to set locale environment variables to C before installation. It seems I had a problem very similar to yours. See bug#313230. > In the meantime, I installed SBCL 0.8.16 from the testing > Debian repository which installed and worked fine. > I did not intend to upgrade to the latest SBCL had it not > produce an error regarding with-output-to-string. The > details are at: > http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_frm/thread/a87893925ce0a19a/29f5bbdc04678248 > I think I'll prefer waiting, since this is a major > issue, hoping the fix is going to come very soon. -- Dmitriyi Paduchikh From liw at iki.fi Wed Jul 20 09:39:23 2005 From: liw at iki.fi (Lars Wirzenius) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:39:23 +0300 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#319163: common-lisp-controller: purging leaves /etc/lisp-config.l.lisp Message-ID: <1121852364.7033.3.camel@esme.liw.iki.fi> Package: common-lisp-controller Version: 4.15 The postinst script of common-lisp-controller creates /etc/lisp-config.lisp, but the prerm or postrm scripts do not remove it, which means that the package does not install cleanly. This is not a big problem, since nothing should particularly break from it, but it should still be fixed. (Found with piuparts. :) From kurem at upcase.inf.upol.cz Wed Jul 20 19:37:34 2005 From: kurem at upcase.inf.upol.cz (Miroslav Kure) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:37:34 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#319265: [l10n] Initial Czech translation of hyperspec debconf messages Message-ID: <20050720193734.GB6817@vychodil.inf.upol.cz> Package: hyperspec Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Hi, in attachement there is initial Czech translation (cs.po) of hyperspec debconf messages, please include it. -- Miroslav Kure -------------- next part -------------- ?1??Bcs.po???n?F??~??}p?xI?uZ?M?????S?V ??eE???]ew(?~?<@???=}?^?Wg?%?m$:53?????v?v??#+??$??@???E?????????PT???Bal-i&H?o??????Q?$e4( c9???????fJVU 3? ?\e?02]*9sU?I?l?5?H???Q?0 4?~??9?z?*t???z?r???&?rd{ij ??X?>H-T??`fD????"@?s?*9???6N?O?8???bf????????? ?y#?X(?fi/????????Xi??j???/???+3C?(M?Kc? ??M`???=???uQ?????????#??????bk?i.~??L"????????#.p???3?,?k&N?L ?'>C?????)?'?c?|!? ???G? I?????=??J?'??H??G??2??H?{4?3e ????? y2????_v??2IO9A1BY?p|?Y O? ?????zV)Gn?}?}v??{??rl4q??#I??S?_Q??Bb+b\?? '??????????~?6????6??2~??i at k??2????r?Cz+M??k???]+p=? ?a??t?)xk?/?x??????Q?f~{??Z??e?????eo&??d{?L?l???$???? Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.1.41-1hoary Severity: normal Here is the error I get when starting SLIME with SBCL as the `inferior-lisp-program': --- ; compiling file "/usr/share/common-lisp/source/slime/swank-sbcl.lisp" (written 27 APR 2005 09:11:59 PM): debugger invoked on a SB-EXT:PACKAGE-LOCKED-ERROR in thread 30461: Lock on package SB-C violated when interning DEBUG-SOURCE-INFO. See also: The SBCL Manual, Node "Package Locks" Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name): 0: [CONTINUE ] Ignore the package lock. 1: [IGNORE-ALL ] Ignore all package locks in the context of this operation. 2: [UNLOCK-PACKAGE] Unlock the package. 3: [ABORT ] Exit debugger, returning to top level. (SB-EXT:PACKAGE-LOCK-VIOLATION #) 0] --- Thanks for help, Alexis. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-5-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages sbcl depends on: ii common-lisp-control 4.15hoary This is a Common Lisp source and c ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20ubuntu13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii sbcl-common 1:0.9.1.41-1hoary Architecture independent files for -- no debconf information From rvb at pro-linux.de Fri Jul 22 10:10:03 2005 From: rvb at pro-linux.de (=?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= van Bevern) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:10:03 +0200 Subject: Bug#319427: [cl-debian] Bug#319427: Error while compiling SBCL for SLIME In-Reply-To: <42E03EA3.9030806@nerim.net> References: <42E03EA3.9030806@nerim.net> Message-ID: <20050722101002.GA2827@progn.org> On 22.07.05, Alexis Rimbaud wrote: Hello Alexis, > Version: 1:0.9.1.41-1hoary > Here is the error I get when starting SLIME with SBCL as the > `inferior-lisp-program': Assuming that you are using Slime from Peter van Eynde's repository: The recent released Slime version, which is the one provided there, (1.2.1) is known to support SBCL only up to version 0.8.21. See /usr/share/doc/slime/PROBLEMS for details. Ren? van Bevern, http://progn.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: not available URL: From alerim at nerim.net Fri Jul 22 11:36:52 2005 From: alerim at nerim.net (Alexis Rimbaud) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:36:52 +0200 Subject: Bug#319427: [cl-debian] Bug#319427: Error while compiling SBCL for SLIME In-Reply-To: <20050722101002.GA2827@progn.org> References: <42E03EA3.9030806@nerim.net> <20050722101002.GA2827@progn.org> Message-ID: <42E0DA54.7040702@nerim.net> Hi Ren?, Ren? van Bevern a ?crit : > On 22.07.05, Alexis Rimbaud wrote: > >>Here is the error I get when starting SLIME with SBCL as the >>`inferior-lisp-program': > > > Assuming that you are using Slime from Peter van Eynde's repository: > The recent released Slime version, which is the one provided there, > (1.2.1) is known to support SBCL only up to version 0.8.21. See > /usr/share/doc/slime/PROBLEMS for details. The 0.8.17.4-1 version from universe (which should fit) doesn't work either. The error here occurs when requiring sb-bsd-sockets ("Don't know how to REQUIRE SB-BSD-SOCKETS.") but has nothing to do with SLIME. Since I'm starting with Common Lisp, I don't really need to use SBCL (I think CMUCL could be fine for now), but I don't like to not have the choice... :-) Are these problems specific to Debian or is there a way to have (one of) the last SBCL version working with SLIME? Cheers, Alexis. From rm at seid-online.de Fri Jul 22 12:44:57 2005 From: rm at seid-online.de (R. Mattes) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:44:57 +0200 Subject: Bug#319427: [cl-debian] Bug#319427: Error while compiling SBCL for SLIME In-Reply-To: <42E0DA54.7040702@nerim.net> References: <42E03EA3.9030806@nerim.net> <20050722101002.GA2827@progn.org> <42E0DA54.7040702@nerim.net> Message-ID: <1122036298.5983.6.camel@hobbes.mh-freiburg.de> On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 13:36 +0200, Alexis Rimbaud wrote: > Hi Ren?, > > Ren? van Bevern a ?crit : > > On 22.07.05, Alexis Rimbaud wrote: > > > >>Here is the error I get when starting SLIME with SBCL as the > >>`inferior-lisp-program': > > > > > > Assuming that you are using Slime from Peter van Eynde's repository: > > The recent released Slime version, which is the one provided there, > > (1.2.1) is known to support SBCL only up to version 0.8.21. See > > /usr/share/doc/slime/PROBLEMS for details. > > The 0.8.17.4-1 version from universe (which should fit) doesn't work > either. The error here occurs when requiring sb-bsd-sockets ("Don't know > how to REQUIRE SB-BSD-SOCKETS.") but has nothing to do with SLIME. Same happened to me over here on a freshly installed Ubuntu/Hoary. This looks _suspiciously_ like the problem with build environment I encountered on Debian/PPC a while ago: the test in contrib/bsd-sockets fails (because of missing echo service?) and the module doesn't get included into the package. > Since I'm starting with Common Lisp, I don't really need to use SBCL (I > think CMUCL could be fine for now), but I don't like to not have the > choice... :-) > > Are these problems specific to Debian or is there a way to have (one of) > the last SBCL version working with SLIME? Well, the sbcl-9.nn seem to have a general slime problem. HTH Ralf Mattes > Cheers, > Alexis. > > > _______________________________________________ > cl-debian mailing list > cl-debian at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian From rvb at pro-linux.de Fri Jul 22 12:49:16 2005 From: rvb at pro-linux.de (=?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= van Bevern) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:49:16 +0200 Subject: Bug#319427: [cl-debian] Bug#319427: Error while compiling SBCL for SLIME In-Reply-To: <42E0DA54.7040702@nerim.net> References: <42E03EA3.9030806@nerim.net> <20050722101002.GA2827@progn.org> <42E0DA54.7040702@nerim.net> Message-ID: <20050722124916.GB2827@progn.org> On 22.07.05, Alexis Rimbaud wrote: Hello Alexis, > The 0.8.17.4-1 version from universe (which should fit) doesn't work either. The error here occurs when requiring > sb-bsd-sockets ("Don't know how to REQUIRE SB-BSD-SOCKETS.") but has > nothing to do with SLIME. True, I have just tried it out in a Hoary chroot. The 0.8.16 from Sarge works, but 0.8.17 in Hoary does not find SB-BSD-SOCKETS. The Hoary package only contains sb-bsd-sockets as source code in /usr/share/sbcl/contrib, not compiled in /usr/lib/sbcl. There is however a kludge to make it use the provided source code: (run as the user that is going to use SB-BSD-SOCKETS) /usr/sbin/clc-register-user-package /usr/share/sbcl/contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/sb-bsd-sockets.asd Note that this is really only a workaround, as it will compile everything, also some C source code, on your first loading attempt. This will take some time for your first (require 'sb-bsd-sockets) or Slime run. > Since I'm starting with Common Lisp, I don't really need to use SBCL > (I think CMUCL could be fine for now), but I don't > like to not have the choice... :-) I am not going to start a discussion about different implementations now. :) But it really does not matter for a beginner. > Are these problems specific to Debian Well, the SBCL packages in all Debian versions and Peter's repository are working correctly, at least. (aside the fact thet Slime can not use these recent sbcl versions) > or is there a way to have (one of) the last SBCL version working > with SLIME? It seems like the current CVS tree of Slime has some work done regarding SBCL 0.9.2. I have not tested it, though. Ren? van Bevern, http://progn.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rm at seid-online.de Fri Jul 22 12:44:57 2005 From: rm at seid-online.de (R. Mattes) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:44:57 +0200 Subject: Bug#319427: [cl-debian] Bug#319427: Error while compiling SBCL for SLIME In-Reply-To: <42E0DA54.7040702@nerim.net> References: <42E03EA3.9030806@nerim.net> <20050722101002.GA2827@progn.org> <42E0DA54.7040702@nerim.net> Message-ID: <1122036298.5983.6.camel@hobbes.mh-freiburg.de> On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 13:36 +0200, Alexis Rimbaud wrote: > Hi Ren?, > > Ren? van Bevern a ?crit : > > On 22.07.05, Alexis Rimbaud wrote: > > > >>Here is the error I get when starting SLIME with SBCL as the > >>`inferior-lisp-program': > > > > > > Assuming that you are using Slime from Peter van Eynde's repository: > > The recent released Slime version, which is the one provided there, > > (1.2.1) is known to support SBCL only up to version 0.8.21. See > > /usr/share/doc/slime/PROBLEMS for details. > > The 0.8.17.4-1 version from universe (which should fit) doesn't work > either. The error here occurs when requiring sb-bsd-sockets ("Don't know > how to REQUIRE SB-BSD-SOCKETS.") but has nothing to do with SLIME. Same happened to me over here on a freshly installed Ubuntu/Hoary. This looks _suspiciously_ like the problem with build environment I encountered on Debian/PPC a while ago: the test in contrib/bsd-sockets fails (because of missing echo service?) and the module doesn't get included into the package. > Since I'm starting with Common Lisp, I don't really need to use SBCL (I > think CMUCL could be fine for now), but I don't like to not have the > choice... :-) > > Are these problems specific to Debian or is there a way to have (one of) > the last SBCL version working with SLIME? Well, the sbcl-9.nn seem to have a general slime problem. HTH Ralf Mattes > Cheers, > Alexis. > > > _______________________________________________ > cl-debian mailing list > cl-debian at common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-debian From martin.sin at seznam.cz Sat Jul 23 06:34:57 2005 From: martin.sin at seznam.cz (Martin =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A9=EDn?=) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:34:57 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#319578: [l10n] Czech translation for cltl Message-ID: <1122100497.7973.4.camel@gentoonbk.cz> Package: cltl Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch In attachement there is initial Czech translation (cs.po) for cltl package, please include it. Regards, Martin Sin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cltl_1.0.15_cs.po Type: text/x-gettext-translation Size: 2199 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mange at freemail.hu Wed Jul 27 19:21:17 2005 From: mange at freemail.hu (Magnus Henoch) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:21:17 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#320237: cl-port: Sockets don't work with stock sbcl Message-ID: Package: cl-port Version: 1.0.1.3-2 Severity: wishlist With sbcl, cmucl, clisp and cl-port installed, running the following code succeeds on clisp and cmucl but fails on sbcl with "Not implemented": (assuming a web server running on localhost) (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :port) (setf s (port:open-socket "localhost" 80)) (format s "HEAD / HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost ") (format t "Got output: ~A~%" (read-line s)) Looking at net.lisp, it seems that sockets would work in sbcl with either "db-sockets" or "net.sbcl.sockets", but not with "sb-bsd-sockets", which is included in sbcl. It would be nice if net.lisp supported sb-bsd-sockets. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages cl-port depends on: ii common-lisp-controller 4.15 This is a Common Lisp source and c cl-port recommends no packages. -- no debconf information From owner at bugs.debian.org Thu Jul 28 06:34:57 2005 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:34:57 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: Re: Bug#319970: FTBFS: Internal error in SBCL In-Reply-To: <20050727140740.GA3188@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050727140740.GA3188@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 319970 sbcl Bug#319970: FTBFS: Internal error in SBCL Bug reassigned from package `cl-aspectl' to `sbcl'. > tags 319970 - unreproducible Bug#319970: FTBFS: Internal error in SBCL Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible > tags 319970 - moreinfo Bug#319970: FTBFS: Internal error in SBCL Tags were: moreinfo Tags removed: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) From pvaneynd at mailworks.org Fri Jul 29 08:55:03 2005 From: pvaneynd at mailworks.org (Peter Van Eynde) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:55:03 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] Re: Bug#317533: sbcl install does not complete (with CPUat %99) In-Reply-To: <87eka7kwcb.fsf@paduch.mail.ru> References: <9940BA60F8E6414F9F0307DD411BCF6906BF924D@ex2k.bilgi.networks> <87eka7kwcb.fsf@paduch.mail.ru> Message-ID: <42E9EEE7.8070400@mailworks.org> Dmitriyi Paduchikh wrote: > You may try to set locale environment variables to C before > installation. It seems I had a problem very similar to yours. See > bug#313230. I would have also suggested this. Try to install with LC_ALL=C LANG=C Hmm. I think I'll remove the Reply-To hack as the debian bug db has nothing of this thread... Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| From emres at bilgi.edu.tr Fri Jul 29 09:35:06 2005 From: emres at bilgi.edu.tr (=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Emre_Sevin=E7?=) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:35:06 +0300 Subject: [cl-debian] Re: Bug#317533: sbcl install does not complete (with CPUat %99) In-Reply-To: <42E9EEE7.8070400@mailworks.org> References: <9940BA60F8E6414F9F0307DD411BCF6906BF924D@ex2k.bilgi.networks> <87eka7kwcb.fsf@paduch.mail.ru> <42E9EEE7.8070400@mailworks.org> Message-ID: <42E9F84A.9070608@bilgi.edu.tr> Peter Van Eynde wrote: > Dmitriyi Paduchikh wrote: > >> You may try to set locale environment variables to C before >> installation. It seems I had a problem very similar to yours. See >> bug#313230. > > > I would have also suggested this. Try to install with > LC_ALL=C LANG=C > My only solution was to install a new kernel: 2.6.11 After booting with that kernel I was able to use SBCL (I also tried running it in 2.4 after installing it in 2.6.11 but it didn't work, too). So I went along with linux kernel 2.6.11 and SBCL 0.9.2 debian package. -- Emre Sevinc eMBA Software Development Team Istanbul Bilgi University http://www.bilgi.edu.tr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: getfirefox_large.png Type: image/png Size: 3958 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org Fri Jul 29 12:34:32 2005 From: ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org (Debian Archive Maintenance) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:34:32 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Bug#317416: fixed Message-ID: We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: acl-alisp | 6.2.32 | i386, powerpc acl-alisp8 | 6.2.32 | i386, powerpc acl-installer | 6.2.32 | source, i386, powerpc acl-mlisp | 6.2.32 | i386, powerpc acl-mlisp8 | 6.2.32 | i386, powerpc acl-pro-installer | 6.2.32 | i386, powerpc acldoc-el | 6.2.32 | all arpd | 1.0.2-10 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc bg5cc | 0.1-5 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc bg5ps | 1.3.0-1.2 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc bibview | 2.2-8 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc bock | 0.20.2.6 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc boust | 0.161-6 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc cce | 0.36-2 | source, i386 cl-odcl | 1.3.5-3 | source, all epic4-script-thirdeye | 1.72-4 | source, all ezmlm | 0.53-11 | source ezmlm-src | 0.53-11 | all fda | 1.0-4 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc freewrl | 1.07-1 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc ftape | 4.04a.x.2002.03.21-0.10 | source ftape-doc | 1.04.x.2001.11.12-0.2 | source, all ftape-source | 4.04a.x.2002.03.21-0.10 | alpha, i386 ftape-tools | 1:1.09.2002.03.21-0.3 | source ftape-util | 1:1.09.2002.03.21-0.3 | alpha, arm, i386 gpppkill | 1.0.3-5 | arm, ia64 gpppkill | 1.0.3-6 | source, alpha, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc gsn-curses | 1:1-2 | all gsn-jigsaw | 1:1-2 | all gtkrecover | 0.3-9 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc gumshoe | 1:1-2 | all if-transition | 1:1-2 | source ipautofw | 980511-2 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc jitterbug | 1.6.2-4.5 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libapache-auth-ldap | 1.6.0-8 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libarr | 0.1-52 | source libarr-dev | 0.1-52 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libarr0 | 0.1-52 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libctk | 3.0.24.6 | source libctk-dev | 3.0.24.6 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libctk3 | 3.0.24.6 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libctk3-dev | 3.0.24.6 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libmeshio-dev | 0.2.0-4.4 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libmeshio0 | 0.2.0-4.4 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libmifluz0 | 0.24.0-10 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libmifluz0-dev | 0.24.0-10 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc librio500-dev | 0.8.1-6 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libtest-unit-perl | 0.24-2 | source, all lpkg | 19980629-3 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc meshio | 0.2.0-4.4 | source mifluz | 0.24.0-10 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc mifluz-doc | 0.24.0-10 | all moria | 5.5.2-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, ia64, m68k, mips, powerpc, s390 moria | 5.5.2-6 | source, i386 nase-a60 | 0.20a-4 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc nqxml | 1.1.3p1-2 | source, all p3nfs | 5.18-1 | alpha, arm, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc p3nfs | 5.18-2 | source, hppa, i386 pgperl | 1:2.18-5 | source, alpha, i386, m68k, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc phototk | 0.9.9.0-5 | source, all propsel | 971130-5.3 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc ptknettools | 0.2.3 | source, all pup | 1.1-5 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc qvplay | 0.95-4 | source, alpha, i386, mips race | 0.7.0-10 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc race-data | 0.7.0-10 | all rio500 | 0.8.1-6 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc rtf2latex | 1.0fc2-4 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc rubymagick | 0.1.3-13 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc sel | 0.08.4-2 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc selectwm | 0.4.1-2 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc shx | 1:0.1.49-2 | hppa, hurd-i386 shx | 1:0.1.49-3 | source, alpha, arm, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc so-far | 1:1-2 | all splitdigest | 2.4-5 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc statslog | 2.0.10-2 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc stklos | 0.55-0.2 | ia64 stklos | 0.55-1 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc tatctae | 1:1-2 | all tkworld | 1.4.0-3 | source, all trustees | 2.8-3 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc ttfprint | 0.9-5.3 | hurd-i386 ttfprint | 0.9-6 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc visual-tcl | 1:1.6.0b2-2 | all visualos | 1.0.5-1 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc vtcl | 1:1.6.0b2-2 | source w3mir | 1:1.0.10-4 | source, all weather | 1:1-2 | all wminet | 2.0.3-10 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc wmpload | 0.9.5-2 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc wordinspect | 0.1a-8.2 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc xae | 1.0beta6-5 | source, all xbmbrowser | 5.1-8.2 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc xwave | 0.6+2-10 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc yencode | 0.46-1 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc zircon | 1.18.255-5 | source, all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 317416 at bugs.debian.org. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster at debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) From cl-debian at pvaneynd.mailworks.org Sat Jul 30 08:19:17 2005 From: cl-debian at pvaneynd.mailworks.org (Peter Van Eynde) Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:19:17 +0200 Subject: [cl-debian] darcs repositories available Message-ID: <42EB3805.7070307@pvaneynd.mailworks.org> Hello people, I've created a alioth project to host the darcs repositories of people working on CL on debian. The structure is as follows: to get my (pvaneynd) cl-plus repository you have: darcs get\ http://cl-debian.alioth.debian.org/repository/pvaneynd/cl-plus/ Other people who want to host their repositories (related to packaging), just give me a shout with your alioth id. Please note that some upstream repositories contain the CVS directories to allow an easy upgrade to a non-released CVS version. To build these packages you need to use: darcs-buildpackage -rfakeroot '-i_darcs|CVS|.cvsignore' Also darcs-buildpackage has a problem with epochs at the moment, but you can just create a tar of the broken upstream directory with the correct and the wrong name, like for sbcl: sbcl_0.9.3.0.orig.tar.gz and sbcl_1:0.9.3.0.orig.tar.gz. Have fun. Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| From owner at bugs.debian.org Sun Jul 31 17:49:09 2005 From: owner at bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:49:09 -0700 Subject: [cl-debian] Processed: closing 305396 In-Reply-To: <20050731173952.29156179F13@sharrow> References: <20050731173952.29156179F13@sharrow> Message-ID: Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2 > close 305396 19a-release-20040728-12 Bug#305396: [l10n] Czech translation for cmucl 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 19a-release-20040728-12, send any further explanations to Martin ????n > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)