[Cffi-devel] cffi-grovel bitfield

[Luís Oliveira]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Frank <fau at riseup.net> wrote:
> We could add a new construct like this for c-enums holding bitfields?
>
> (define-grovel-syntax bitfieldenum (name-and-opts &rest masks)
[...]

Sounds good, but perhaps we can refactor things such that we have only
CENUM and BITFIELD -- ditching CONSTANTENUM and BITFIELDENUM -- and
whether they expect constants or enums becomes a parameter. Makes
sense?

-- 
Luís Oliveira
http://kerno.org/~luis/