Problems with nested structs and the newer cffi
Liam Healy
lnp at healy.washington.dc.us
Wed Apr 24 19:44:02 UTC 2013
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Willem Rein Oudshoorn
<woudshoo at xs4all.nl>wrote:
>
> Thank you for all your work and the time to answer my questions.
>
> Liam Healy <lnp at healy.washington.dc.us> writes:
>
> > Willem,
> >
> > Thanks for the report.
> >
> > My thinking is that with-foreign-slots is intended to expose the value
> (and
> > not the pointer), and therefore, expands to foreign-slot-value, so the
> > behavior you're seeing is correct. Your fix to your code is the correct
> way
> > to access the pointer. I think with-foreign-slots is provided as a
> > convenient shortcut to get all the values; since it doesn't do what you
> > need, you need to use the actual access form (foreign-slot-pointer in
> your
> > case).
>
> Ah, ok, I am a bit struggling to convert the old way to the new way. It
> probably has nothing to do with (with-foreign-slots ...), but just my
> mis understanding and trying to quickly convert old code to new.
>
Well, there's a bit of unwritten convention being used, so confusion is
understandable (and I had to think about it and infer what
with-foreign-slots is intended to do). Before we introduced
structures-by-value, this wasn't an issue.
>
> > For your second question: if the argument is actually a pointer to the
> > structure, :pointer is the right thing to use. Are you sure it is a
> pointer
> > argument? Check the .h file where it is defined.
> >
>
> Ah, I do not have an issue with passing it to the c library.
> What I meant was that in my mind the following confused me:
>
> (let ((c-oid (foreing-alloc '(:struct git-oid))))
> ;;; I think of c-oid, conceptually as type
> ;;; (:pointer (:struct git-oid))
> ;;;; later:
>
> (foreign-slot-pointer c-oid '(:struct git-oid) 'id)
> ;;; I thought that because c-oid is of type
> ;;; (:pointer (:struct git-oid))
> ;;; I thought I needed to put here
> ;;; '(:pointer (:struct git-oid)) instead of
> ;;; '(:struct git-oid)
>
> Does this make sense?
>
The documentation to
foreign-slot-pointer<http://common-lisp.net/project/cffi/manual/html_node/foreign_002dslot_002dpointer.html>
says
" ptr
A pointer to a structure.
type
A foreign structure type. "
so it makes sense to me the that first argument is a pointer to a
structure, and the second argument is the type of that structure (and not
the type of the first argument, i.e., the pointer type).
>
> Now I have a small additional question.
>
> I have a struct like:
>
> (defcstruct (git-index-time :class index-time-struct)
> ....)
>
> Now the (translate-from-foreign value (type index-time-struct))
> works if I use as type:
>
> (:struct git-index-time)
>
> So everyting works. However, if I do:
>
> (defctype struct-index-time (:struct git-index-time))
>
> And use as type:
>
> struct-index-time
>
> The `translate-from-foreign` is not called and I end up
> with untranslated values.
>
> I thought that (defctype ...) worked as a typedef and
> naively expected the type translation to still work.
>
> Is this as expected?
>
>
No, that seems like a CFFI error. Per Luis, a bug report would be helpful.
Liam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cffi-devel/attachments/20130424/0234cdf7/attachment.html>
More information about the cffi-devel
mailing list