[cffi-devel] Fix CFFI-UFFI-compat on ECL

[Michael Raskin]

On 01/30/2010 01:25 PM, dherring at tentpost.com wrote:
>> package. I think the second is a better (although marginally more
>> complex) behavior, because it increases portability and reduces number
>> of people who notice implementation quirks of UFFI package.
> 
> Why load cffi's uffi-compat if ECL has its own UFFI?  I don't see the
> increase in portability.

Well, the question is whether CFFI has more subtle differences when used
on different implementations than "native" UFFI implementations have.
OK, I am probably wrong.