[cffi-devel] LispWorks 5.0/5.1 and LONG-LONG support
Chun Tian (binghe)
binghe.lisp at gmail.com
Sat Apr 5 15:51:40 UTC 2008
Hi,
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Chun Tian (binghe)
> <binghe.lisp at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Though LispWorks cannot use a >=version like compile feature like
>> those in
>> Allegro, but since LW is very stable and its version grows very
>> slowly
>> (0.1/year ^_^), I think we can use #+(and lispworks-64bit (not
>> lispworks5.0)) to mean "LispWorks 64-bit version >= 5.1"
>
> 183c193
> < #+#.(cl:if (cl:find-symbol "FOREIGN-TYPED-AREF" "FLI") '(and) '(or))
> ---
>> #+#.(cl:if (cl:find-symbol "FOREIGN-TYPED-AREF" "FLI") '(and
>> lispworks-64bit (not lispworks5.0)) '(or))
>
> IIUC, this would disable this optimization for all non-64bit
> platforms. It seems easier to simply state that CFFI long-longs
> require LW version 5.1 or greater on 64-bit platforms. Got any
> objections against that?
I ... think CFFI should support LispWorks 5.0 for long-long, because
5.0 (64-bit) do support it and not every 5.0 user can upgrade to 5.1
(new license and money is required). And (I think) LispWorks will
continue support 5.0 by release new patches in the future. For me, I'm
using both 5.0 and 5.1 right now. Without long-long support, it is
impossible to compile IOLIB on LispWorks 64-bit 5.0.
Since it's not hard to consider both versions, I (personal) hope you
can support them both, and that will be perfect.
Regards,
Chun Tian (binghe)
>
>
> --
> Luís Oliveira
> http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/
More information about the cffi-devel
mailing list