[cffi-devel] Re: %expand-type-to-foreign-dyn vs *runtime-translator-form*

[Stephen Compall]

On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 17:11 +0100, Luís Oliveira wrote:
> Stephen Compall <s11 at member.fsf.org> writes:
> > http://scompall.nocandysw.com/cffi/etfd-opt3.darcs.patch
> > http://scompall.nocandysw.com/cffi/etfd-opt1.darcs.patch
> 
> Many thanks for producing patches for both options! I'm inclined towards
> option 1 and IIUC you are inclined towards option 3

Great!  I actually prefer option 1 as well.

-- 
Stephen Compall
http://scompall.nocandysw.com/blog
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cffi-devel/attachments/20060331/996ff62a/attachment.sig>