Luís Oliveira wrote:
> Other platforms where SBCL doesn't use the linkage table yet will fail
> this test as well. So I've marked this test as expected when *features*
> match (and sbcl (not linkage-table)).
>
Hmm, now (SBCL 0.9.11.3) linkage table is present:
CL-USER> *features*
(:ASDF :ANSI-CL
:COMMON-LISP
:SBCL
:UNIX
:SB-DOC
:SB-TEST
:SB-PACKAGE-LOCKS
:SB-UNICODE
:SB-SOURCE-LOCATIONS
:IEEE-FLOATING-POINT
:X86
:WIN32
:GENCGC
:STACK-GROWS-DOWNWARD-NOT-UPWARD
:C-STACK-IS-CONTROL-STACK
:STACK-ALLOCATABLE-CLOSURES
:ALIEN-CALLBACKS
:LINKAGE-TABLE
:OS-PROVIDES-DLOPEN
:OS-PROVIDES-PUTWC)
but:
Test CFFI-TESTS::DEFCFUN.UNDEFINED failed
Form: (PROGN
(EVAL
'(CFFI:DEFCFUN
("undefined_foreign_function"
CFFI-TESTS::UNDEFINED-FOREIGN-FUNCTION)
:VOID))
(COMPILE 'CFFI-TESTS::UNDEFINED-FOREIGN-FUNCTION)
T)
Expected value: T
Actual value: #<UNDEFINED-ALIEN-ERROR undefined_foreign_function {A7A4631}>.
Why?
Thanks!
--
WBR, Yaroslav Kavenchuk.