[cells-devel] not-to-be and owning slots

[Ken Tilton]

Ken Tilton wrote:
> Peter Hildebrandt wrote:
> 
>>>> Sounds good.  I wasn't sure as to whether I understood what I was
>>>> doing.  I just saw that not-to-be did not propagate to kids *at all*
>>>> if I did it the way I suggested.
>>>
>>>
>>> OK.
>>
>>
>>
>> That was with test-gtk -- my favorite test case.
> 
> 
> I hacked up not-to-be a little (tho nothing fundamentally different than 
> what I recall of your efforts which I cannot find in my email), moved 
> cells-store out into its own source file (update your asd!), reran the 
> cells regression test and test-gtk -- everything works.
> 
> Mind you there may not be a non-.kids owning test anywhere in there, or 
> even anything that verifies that the .kids are getting quiesced, but 
> your report above of "I just saw that not-to-be did not propagate to 
> kids *at all*" does not say /how/ you saw that, so maybe there is still 
> non-propagation which is not being exposed by the test suite and still 
> needs to be cured.

yep. I think I am seeing it myself. stay tuned.

this is probably, btw, something about load-time vs compile-time, with 
me propagating :ownings at compile-time and not getting those on a 
reload... nope, just a total mess from the beginning, hairy rewrite 
underway.

kt