[cells-devel] not-to-be and owning slots

[Ken Tilton]

Peter Hildebrandt wrote:
>>>Sounds good.  I wasn't sure as to whether I understood what I was
>>>doing.  I just saw that not-to-be did not propagate to kids *at all*
>>>if I did it the way I suggested.
>>
>> OK.
> 
> 
> That was with test-gtk -- my favorite test case.

I hacked up not-to-be a little (tho nothing fundamentally different than 
what I recall of your efforts which I cannot find in my email), moved 
cells-store out into its own source file (update your asd!), reran the 
cells regression test and test-gtk -- everything works.

Mind you there may not be a non-.kids owning test anywhere in there, or 
even anything that verifies that the .kids are getting quiesced, but 
your report above of "I just saw that not-to-be did not propagate to 
kids *at all*" does not say /how/ you saw that, so maybe there is still 
non-propagation which is not being exposed by the test suite and still 
needs to be cured.

kt