[cells-devel] not-to-be and owning slots

[Peter Hildebrandt]

I came across something, which seem odd to me:

- If I remove an instance from a kids slot, not-to-be is called on that instance
- If I remove an instance form any :owning t slot, not-to-be is called
on that instance
- If not-to-be is called on an instance, it is also called on all its kids

BUT

If not-to-be is called on an instance, it is NOT called on all
instances its :owning t slots.

Is this desired behavior, or dfid it get overlooked when owning was introduced?

What is the recommended way to deal with it?

- write a not-to-be method for my specific class which setfs the owned
slots to nil to trigger not-to-be?
- write a not-to-be method for my specific class which mapcs not-to-be
over its owned slots?
or
- fix it in cells and change not-to-be there so it does not only
recurse down kids, but all owned slots?

Thanks for any advice,

Peter