Discoverability of CDR implementations (pre-submission discussion)

[Michael Raskin]

Ooops, sorry, sent to the wrong list. Forwarding to the correct one.

>>>>

                Hello

        I was told that it might be better to have a separate document
about interaction of CDRs and packages. I think as the problem with
packages for CDR-defined symbols is about discoverability and probing,
it is a good idea to also provide some functionality for probing for
available but not loaded CDR implementations.

The draft is currently available at:

https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/mraskin/cdr-walkability/blob/master/cdr-packaging.txt

It is also attached as a text file to this message

All feedback is of course very welcome.

Thank you, goodbye
        Michael Raskin

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: cdr-packaging.txt
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cdr-discuss/attachments/20190623/3539e0c1/attachment.txt>