[cdr-discuss] Re: [RfC] WITH-READTABLE-ITERATOR
Tobias C. Rittweiler
tcr at freebits.de
Fri Oct 3 13:41:48 UTC 2008
Stephen Compall <s11 at member.fsf.org> writes:
> I offer two extensions to the proposed standard:
> 1. Make READTABLE a "readtable designator", having its meaning from the
> CLHS (where NIL indicates the initial readtable).
> 2. Specify that a type-error shall be signaled when READTABLE does not
> evaluate to a readtable designator.
I changed the proposal accordingly.
More information about the cdr-discuss