[cdr-discuss] Re: [RfC] WITH-READTABLE-ITERATOR

[Tobias C. Rittweiler]

Stephen Compall <s11 at member.fsf.org> writes:

> I offer two extensions to the proposed standard:
>
> 1. Make READTABLE a "readtable designator", having its meaning from the
>    CLHS (where NIL indicates the initial readtable).
>
> 2. Specify that a type-error shall be signaled when READTABLE does not
>    evaluate to a readtable designator.

I changed the proposal accordingly.

  -T.