[cdr-discuss] Three RFCs

Edi Weitz edi at agharta.de
Tue Mar 18 14:08:16 UTC 2008


On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:49:19 +0100 (CET), "Leslie P. Polzer" <leslie.polzer at gmx.net> wrote:

> I'm all for extending CL:CASE in a backwards-compatible way. Why
> would that be a problem for CL implementors?

It wouldn't be ANSI-compliant anymore.



More information about the cdr-discuss mailing list