[Bordeaux-threads-devel] Deprecating recursive locks

Vladimir Sedach vsedach at gmail.com
Tue Apr 17 16:14:31 UTC 2012


I think it is a very good idea.

When are you planning the 1.0 release? It would be nice to go through
all the systems dependent on bordeaux-threads in Quicklisp and notify
the maintainers of any that use recursive locks to fix their code.

Vladimir

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Stelian Ionescu <sionescu at cddr.org> wrote:
> They're an ugly hack, as described their inventor David Butenhof
> (http://tinyurl.com/butenhof-recursive-mutexes) and aren't supported by
> all lisps: Allegro, Clozure, CMUCL, SBCL(it has a kind of recursive
> lock, but it's not a posix recursive lock), so I was thinking of making
> a 1.0 release in which to remove them altogether.
>
> What do you think ?
>
> --
> Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
> http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bordeaux-threads-devel mailing list
> Bordeaux-threads-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bordeaux-threads-devel
>




More information about the bordeaux-threads-devel mailing list