From drewc at tech.coop Tue Jun 15 14:54:03 2010 From: drewc at tech.coop (Drew Crampsie) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bese-devel] [PATCH] Use the provided form for session in WITH-LOCK-HELD-ON-SESSION In-Reply-To: References: <20090923112408.02e0f5c9@whitehouse.id.au> Message-ID: Hey, I'm on vacation for a week or so. Clinton, can you have a look at these and apply them? Do you have access to the cl-net repo? If not, throw it on corsucant and i'll pull them from there when i can. Cheers, drewc On 14 June 2010 12:25, Daniel White wrote: > Not sure what the story is, but I've just dumped the files into a > Google Docs for now since I don't have any better space to host the > patches at present. > > https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B4jyBCwAiYwMZjA4NDBlMzctNTgzOC00MzdmLWFkZTMtMzdlYTJlM2NiZDU5&hl=en > > One fixes a bug where the lexical value of the session is captured. > > The other fixes a bug that breaks the CALL/ANSWER mechanism when you > have multiple nested components. > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Daniel White wrote: >> Sorry to be a nuisance yet again, but did this even make it through? >> I'm not getting any bounce messages, so I can't for the life of me >> work out why messages with attachments aren't making it through. >> >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Daniel White wrote: >>> Previously it was capturing the lexical value of session. > > Cheers, > > -- > Daniel White > From clinton at unknownlamer.org Thu Jun 17 17:20:49 2010 From: clinton at unknownlamer.org (Clinton Ebadi) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bese-devel] [PATCH] Use the provided form for session in WITH-LOCK-HELD-ON-SESSION In-Reply-To: (Drew Crampsie's message of "Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:54:03 -0400") References: <20090923112408.02e0f5c9@whitehouse.id.au> Message-ID: <87vd9hlgni.fsf@rvannith.home.unknownlamer.org> Drew Crampsie writes: > Hey, > > I'm on vacation for a week or so. Clinton, can you have a look at > these and apply them? Do you have access to the cl-net repo? If not, > throw it on corsucant and i'll pull them from there when i can. Ok, I looked at the patches finally. Two of them will apply cleanly, but the > Cheers, > > drewc > > On 14 June 2010 12:25, Daniel White wrote: >> Not sure what the story is, but I've just dumped the files into a >> Google Docs for now since I don't have any better space to host the >> patches at present. >> >> https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B4jyBCwAiYwMZjA4NDBlMzctNTgzOC00MzdmLWFkZTMtMzdlYTJlM2NiZDU5&hl=en >> >> One fixes a bug where the lexical value of the session is captured. >> >> The other fixes a bug that breaks the CALL/ANSWER mechanism when you >> have multiple nested components. >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Daniel White wrote: >>> Sorry to be a nuisance yet again, but did this even make it through? >>> I'm not getting any bounce messages, so I can't for the life of me >>> work out why messages with attachments aren't making it through. >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Daniel White wrote: >>>> Previously it was capturing the lexical value of session. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Daniel White >> > -- emacsen: "Like... windows are portals man... emacsen: Dude... let's yank this shit out of the kill ring" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 229 bytes Desc: not available URL: