[Bese-devel] question about FiveAM & Arnesi bug report: compile fails in Lispworks Pro 5.1 for Linux
Larry Clapp
larry at theclapp.org
Tue Nov 4 13:40:34 UTC 2008
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:56:07AM -0500, Larry Clapp wrote:
> Bug report:
>
> ASDF compiling lexenv.lisp:
>
> Error: Reader cannot find package LEXICAL.
>
> The code in question is (I think):
>
> #+(and lispworks (or win32 linux))
> (defmethod environment-p ((environment lexical::environment))
> t)
>
> The class browser shows two packages with an ENVIRONMENT class
> (ENVIRONMENT:ENVIRONMENT and COMPILER::ENVIRONMENT), so I'm not sure
> which to change it to.
Further research suggests that Arnesi uses an environment interface
found in LW 4.x. I tried a brute-force-and-lots-of-ignorance approach
and changed
#+(and lispworks (or win32 linux))
to
#+(and lispworks (not lispworks5.1) (or win32 linux))
;; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
and then Arnesi at least compiled. Whether it works correctly seems
unlikely. Most FiveAM tests pass, but some don't:
5AM 5 > (run! :it.bese.fiveam)
[... snip lots of dots ...]
Did 46 checks.
Pass: 44 (95%)
Skip: 0 ( 0%)
Fail: 2 ( 4%)
Failure Details:
--------------------------------
IS []:
Unexpected Error: #<UNDEFINED-FUNCTION 200D23D3>
Undefined function IT.BESE.ARNESI::%COLLECT-TIMING called with
arguments (#<Function ((LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 8) . 1) 21B0A25A>)...
--------------------------------
--------------------------------
BEFORE []:
RESULTS evaluated to (#<TEST-FAILURE 22209337> #<TEST-PASSED
2220408B>), which is not SOME to #<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION
TEST-SKIPPED-P 21B10E52>..
--------------------------------
NIL
Poking further, I saw that Arnesi has a test-suite itself, but it
wouldn't compile:
5AM 8 > (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :arnesi.test)
[snip]
;;; Compiling file /home/lmc/lisp/arnesi_dev/t/csv.lisp ...
;;; Safety = 1, Speed = 3, Space = 1, Float = 1, Interruptible = 0
;;; Compilation speed = 0, Debug = 3, Fixnum safety = 3
;;; Source level debugging is on
;;; Source file recording is on
;;; Cross referencing is on
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 0)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 1)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 2)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 2)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 3)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 3)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 4)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 4)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 4)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 4)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 5)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 5)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 5)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 5)
; (LISPWORKS:TOP-LEVEL-FORM 0)
; Loading fasl file /home/lmc/lisp/arnesi_dev/t/accumulation.ufasl
; Loading fasl file /home/lmc/lisp/arnesi_dev/t/call-cc.ufasl
Error: Sorry, No walker for the special operater DECLARE defined.
1 (continue) Try loading /home/lmc/lisp/arnesi_dev/t/call-cc.ufasl again.
2 Give up loading /home/lmc/lisp/arnesi_dev/t/call-cc.ufasl.
3 Try loading another file instead of /home/lmc/lisp/arnesi_dev/t/call-cc.ufasl.
4 Retry performing #<ASDF:LOAD-OP NIL 21A3148B> on #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "call-cc" 2207676F>.
5 Continue, treating #<ASDF:LOAD-OP NIL 21A3148B> on #<ASDF:CL-SOURCE-FILE "call-cc" 2207676F> as
having been successful.
6 (abort) Return to level 0.
7 Return to top loop level 0.
Type :b for backtrace, :c <option number> to proceed, or :? for other options
Does any of that help at all?
As a side note, "operator" is misspelled in the above error message.
% pwd
/home/lmc/lisp/arnesi_dev/src
% grep -i operater *lisp
walk.lisp: (error "Sorry, No walker for the special operater ~S defined." (car form)))
-- Larry
More information about the bese-devel
mailing list