Re[3]: [Bese-devel] UCW AJAX Problem

[John Doe]

Hi

> I would suggest you look at the communication between client and server
> using the Firefox plugin called Tamper Data.

Is it possible to find crossbrowser solution (I need to support IE too) ?

> modlisp form source. It have a vague rememberance that it may have with
> chunked transfers to do. Also, ask yourself what you want the modlisp
> backend for. Is it a premature optimization? Also you can still have apache
> but use proxying and mod_rewrite to communicate with the http or another
> backend.

Simply with mod_lisp backend all worker threads never die, but with UCW's built-in server I get "No worker threads" constantly.

> This seems very very strange, I have not heard of it. Does SBCL stop for
> garbage collection at all? I use it all the time and don't see this.

Exactly. It should have generational GC, but it stops all jobs while collecting garbage.
Is it possible to change this behaviour somehow ? What version of SBCL and Linux do you use for real things ?

> SBCL, which is probably most popular. I have also tried Allegro. You can
> also try clisp or openmcl. But stay away of windows, it is not acceptable
> for production.

Sure ;-) Our target server platform is Linux. 

> If I were you I would stick with SBCL/Linux and the default http server.

It is only one working solution for now, 'cause I can't build working UCW_AJAX using Lispworks,mod_lisp etc. I'd like to use LispWorks. Trying to port current UCW_AJAX to Lispworks > 4.4.

Thanks for answers
XSet

-----Original Message-----
From: "Henrik Hjelte" <henrik.hjelte at stix.to>
To: "John Doe" <x-set at mail.ru>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:33:06 +0200
Subject: Re: Re: [Bese-devel] UCW AJAX Problem

> 
> On 6/26/07, John Doe <x-set at mail.ru> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for answer, attila. When I change backend from built-in to
> > mod_lisp, IE gets right XML answer (with increased counter and HTML
> > elements) through AJAX, but can't render it properly. I think mod_lisp
> > backend sends something different from built-in web server. Is it possible
> > to turn on more detailed logging on JavaScript side ?
> 
> 
> I would suggest you look at the communication between client and server
> using the Firefox plugin called Tamper Data. Also make sure you use the last
> modlisp form source. It have a vague rememberance that it may have with
> chunked transfers to do. Also, ask yourself what you want the modlisp
> backend for. Is it a premature optimization? Also you can still have apache
> but use proxying and mod_rewrite to communicate with the http or another
> backend.
> 
> Another question about lisp implementations. I see that SBCL 1.0.6 collects
> > garbage too long (up to 20 sec. with default options), it is not acceptable
> > for production.
> 
> 
> This seems very very strange, I have not heard of it. Does SBCL stop for
> garbage collection at all? I use it all the time and don't see this.
> 
> 
> > UCW's AJAX branch don't compile with Lispworks 4.4 for Windows (errors
> > related to MOPP), same thing with LispWorks 5 Personal Edition for Linux.
> > What implementation(s) do you actually use ?
> 
> SBCL, which is probably most popular. I have also tried Allegro. You can
> also try clisp or openmcl. But stay away of windows, it is not acceptable
> for production.
> 
> If I were you I would stick with SBCL/Linux and the default http server.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Henrik Hjelte
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards
> > XSet
> > _______________________________________________
> > bese-devel mailing list
> > bese-devel at common-lisp.net
> > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bese-devel
> >
> >
> >
> 
>