[Bese-devel] Re: hunchentoot backend?

[Asbjørn Bjørnstad]

On 10/15/06, Marco Baringer <mb at bese.it> wrote:
> Jan Rychter <jan at rychter.com> writes:
>
> > I currently have some setups with UCW using the plain httpd backend
> > behind lighttpd -- that works, but I have doubts about its scalability
> > and the features are very limited. I'd much rather replace it with
> > hunchentoot behind lighttpd.
>
> yes, i've thought of the same thing. i'd like to be able to drop the
> httpd backend and replace it with hunchentoot, but i want to make sure
> that it works as well as the httpd on openmcl and sbcl first. in
> particular i want to make sure hunchentoot, like the httpd, provides
> the option on not keeping the entire request/response in memory. if it
> does we lose the ability to handle large files (this, and stream
> encoding issues, was one of the reasons i wrote the httpd backend in
> the first place).

I don't think that is a problem.
http://gmane.lisp.lib.tbnl.general/544


-- 
  -asbjxrn