[Bese-devel] Re: OpenLaszlo and UCW

[Waldo Rubinstein]

Marco,

Thanks. That's what I was suspecting. Well, since my original  
intentions were to link my existing UCW app to OL, I might as well  
stick to UCW and use the XML exchange of data. I really haven't done  
it; not have I done anything but continuations in UCW, so I don't  
know how that's going to work out. I guess I will need to play with  
UCW in terms of extracting data purely through HTTP GET/POST requests  
independently of the continuation as well as posting data and  
extracting posting feedback.

Thanks,
Waldo

On May 9, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Marco Baringer wrote:

> Waldo Rubinstein <waldo at trianet.net> writes:
>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> Well, that's the thing. So far, I've just been "playing" with OL.  
>> It is because
>> I also want to combine it with UCW that I was asking. I haven't  
>> done anything
>> to combine/integrate them yet, but I guess not many people have. I  
>> may just
>> take a stab at it later this week, unless someone comes forward  
>> with practical
>> experience or suggestions.
>
> to the best of my knowledge (which is admitedly limited) merging UCW's
> continuations and OL would require reloading the client rich interface
> on every request, which defeats the point of OL. you could always use
> ucw as the backend and just return XML which OL can then deal with,
> but at that point why not just use araneida or tbnl? (i'd still
> suggest using ucw, just because, but you're not going to take
> advantage of continuations or the component UI stuff)
>
> -- 
> -Marco
> Ring the bells that still can ring.
> Forget the perfect offering.
> There is a crack in everything.
> That's how the light gets in.
> 	-Leonard Cohen
>
> _______________________________________________
> bese-devel mailing list
> bese-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bese-devel