From luismbo at gmail.com  Tue May 10 08:38:38 2011
From: luismbo at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lu=EDs_Oliveira?=)
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:38:38 +0100
Subject: [babel-devel] patch for cp1252
In-Reply-To: <874o5pggxd.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <874o5pggxd.fsf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikdHyuP9npb=y0UY8c0ouvCFe6f-g@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Nicolas Martyanoff <khaelin at gmail.com> wrote:
> I added support for the cp1252 encoding:

Just dropping a note to tell you I've applied your patch but haven't
been able to push it yet because c-l.net is undergoing a migration
process.

Thanks,

-- 
Lu?s Oliveira
http://r42.eu/~luis/



From luismbo at gmail.com  Wed May 11 07:32:33 2011
From: luismbo at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lu=EDs_Oliveira?=)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:32:33 +0100
Subject: [babel-devel] octets-to-string with UTF8 and Byte Order Marker
In-Reply-To: <6D8D0E393259694788637A444E1C5EC75C2AEE@venus.intra.aws.net>
References: <6D8D0E393259694788637A444E1C5EC75C2A62@venus.intra.aws.net>
	<BANLkTi=3de47vanPZsTLLAfp6T=s0zuDyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6D8D0E393259694788637A444E1C5EC75C2AEE@venus.intra.aws.net>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikZ+6q-LDJFZnutdoz3mXepKeji2g@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

Sorry for the late reply.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Rob Blackwell <rob.blackwell at aws.net> wrote:
> I'm still a little confused as to why the length is 4 and not 3 - shouldn?t the byte order mark have been discarded?

I'm not sure. I couldn't find any clear indications on how leading
BOMs should be handled for UTF-8. The BOM FAQ seems to indicate they
should be converted to ZERO WIDTH NON-BREAKING SPACEs, maybe. Any
comments? It would perhaps be interesting to check what well
established libraries such as ICU do.

Cheers,

-- 
Lu?s Oliveira
http://r42.eu/~luis/