From levin108 at gmail.com  Wed Dec 21 11:21:33 2011
From: levin108 at gmail.com (levin)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:21:33 +0800
Subject: [babel-devel] Submit a GBK patch
Message-ID: <CA+vr8WYcLomBcb9_q18Fd=aV5B=d=+Sryvoy39gy08sMq9HhRg@mail.gmail.com>

HI,all

Days ago, I found this project babel, and tried to use it in my project, as
I'm Chinese,
I found it doesn't support GBK encoding in babel, so I wrote a patch for
babel to make
it support GBK.

I just used common lisp for not a long time, so if there was something not
good enough, please let me know, I also hope you can accept this patch or
help me
modify it to make babel support GBK, so we can use it freely to process
Chinese text.

Thanks.

-- 
levin
twitter: @levin108 <http://twitter.com/levin108>
blog: basiccoder.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/babel-devel/attachments/20111221/024b8fde/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-New-encoding-GBK.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 76832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/babel-devel/attachments/20111221/024b8fde/attachment.obj>

From n.akr.akiiya at gmail.com  Thu Dec 22 14:55:37 2011
From: n.akr.akiiya at gmail.com (Xiaofeng Yang)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:55:37 +0800
Subject: [babel-devel] Submit a GBK patch
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+N7Gk1HkDgCsmOn+Q=ZaVERnu5q0LSiJcUhN0eEUYTkkSWTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+vr8WYcLomBcb9_q18Fd=aV5B=d=+Sryvoy39gy08sMq9HhRg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ+N7Gk1HkDgCsmOn+Q=ZaVERnu5q0LSiJcUhN0eEUYTkkSWTA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJ+N7GnZOsaJwyVssrAE86_e-xjR9vDMC6ZRkW1PGomCu1nL-g@mail.gmail.com>

I suggest this for both GB2312 and GBK encoding (this 2 encodings are very
important for Chinese users):
http://trac.clozure.com/ccl/changeset/14911
I've tested this for CCL using the encoding tables and tests from GNU's
iconv.

Most babel code came from CCL. I think to integrated this for babel is
easily and more suitable though it just only for CCL now.

     Best regards,
Xiaofeng Yang


2011/12/21 levin <levin108 at gmail.com>

>  HI,all
>
> Days ago, I found this project babel, and tried to use it in my project,
> as I'm Chinese,
> I found it doesn't support GBK encoding in babel, so I wrote a patch for
> babel to make
> it support GBK.
>
> I just used common lisp for not a long time, so if there was something not
> good enough, please let me know, I also hope you can accept this patch or
> help me
> modify it to make babel support GBK, so we can use it freely to process
> Chinese text.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> levin
> twitter: @levin108 <http://twitter.com/levin108>
> blog: basiccoder.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> babel-devel mailing list
> babel-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/babel-devel/attachments/20111222/18cf5bb2/attachment.html>

From avodonosov at yandex.ru  Wed Dec 28 21:21:34 2011
From: avodonosov at yandex.ru (Anton Vodonosov)
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:21:34 +0400
Subject: [babel-devel] Unit tests failures on different lisps
Message-ID: <759491325107294@web141.yandex.ru>

Hello.

I am running tests of some most often Quicklisp-downloaded libraries, including babel.

Babel tests have different number of failures/errors on different Lisps (about 8, 9 or 5).

You may find the results here: http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/pivot_ql-lib_lisp.html

Clicking the ok/fail status refer to the library test logs where you may find what failures
occurred.

Best regards,
- Anton



From luismbo at gmail.com  Thu Dec 29 00:29:17 2011
From: luismbo at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lu=EDs_Oliveira?=)
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:29:17 +0000
Subject: [babel-devel] [cffi-devel] Unit tests failures on different
	lisps
In-Reply-To: <760261325107519@web141.yandex.ru>
References: <760261325107519@web141.yandex.ru>
Message-ID: <CAB-HnLSi9ZCP_jLywuJuV2e=ZRMQadSHqjMDD6MTsdHnr7wf-Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
> I am running tests of some most often downloaded CL libraries, including CFFI.
>
> So far CFFI was only tested on Linux. It has Linux, has different number
> (of expected and unexpected) failures on different Lisps.

Thanks, this is rather helpful since these days I don't convenient
access to all the Lisps/platforms supported by CFFI. Those failures
are mostly harmless, although the BFF ones are probably
implementation-specific bugs.

Is there a way to take advantage of your buildfarm such that I can
test CFFI versions before doing a release or before even pushing to
the main repository?

Cheers,

-- 
Lu?s Oliveira
http://r42.eu/~luis/



From luismbo at gmail.com  Thu Dec 29 01:07:31 2011
From: luismbo at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lu=EDs_Oliveira?=)
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:07:31 +0000
Subject: [babel-devel] Submit a GBK patch
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+N7GnZOsaJwyVssrAE86_e-xjR9vDMC6ZRkW1PGomCu1nL-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+vr8WYcLomBcb9_q18Fd=aV5B=d=+Sryvoy39gy08sMq9HhRg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ+N7Gk1HkDgCsmOn+Q=ZaVERnu5q0LSiJcUhN0eEUYTkkSWTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ+N7GnZOsaJwyVssrAE86_e-xjR9vDMC6ZRkW1PGomCu1nL-g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAB-HnLSmyBkC3gSVkA+Yf80DGXzBUuq00umbMvdkU7JJKPOd-Q@mail.gmail.com>

Yang and Wenpeng,

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofeng Yang <n.akr.akiiya at gmail.com> wrote:
> I suggest this for both GB2312 and GBK encoding (this 2 encodings are very
> important for Chinese users):

I've pushed Wenpeng's patch to the main repository. Some of the bits
in CCL's code do seem cleaner. It'd be nice to simplify Babel's
version if any of you has the time.

Thanks!

-- 
Lu?s Oliveira
http://r42.eu/~luis/



From avodonosov at yandex.ru  Thu Dec 29 03:23:44 2011
From: avodonosov at yandex.ru (Anton Vodonosov)
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:23:44 +0400
Subject: [babel-devel] [cffi-devel] Unit tests failures on different
	lisps
In-Reply-To: <CAB-HnLSi9ZCP_jLywuJuV2e=ZRMQadSHqjMDD6MTsdHnr7wf-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <760261325107519@web141.yandex.ru>
	<CAB-HnLSi9ZCP_jLywuJuV2e=ZRMQadSHqjMDD6MTsdHnr7wf-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <854611325129024@web51.yandex.ru>



29.12.2011, 04:29, "Lu?s Oliveira" <luismbo at gmail.com>:
>
> Is there a way to take advantage of your buildfarm such that I can
> test CFFI versions before doing a release or before even pushing to
> the main repository?

Not yet, because I am in the beginning of the project and only
starting to see the first results (it's not really a buildfarm, but
a small system where anyone may run a simple command, like
(load "agent.lisp"), and it runs the tests and submits the results
to the central server; so that we will be able to accumulate 
the statictics; currently this command just runs tests on 
whatever is the current quicklisp distribution is installed 
on the system, and I am the only person who runs this command 
- I am testing how it works and polishing the corner cases). 

The ability for library authors to express a wish to run tests on the 
recent (not released) version is one of the important future goals. 
There is no decision yet on how it will be specified, we may discuss it.
 I will contact you when (hopefully) I ready for this.

Best regards,
- Anton



From luismbo at gmail.com  Thu Dec 29 11:08:03 2011
From: luismbo at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lu=EDs_Oliveira?=)
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:08:03 +0000
Subject: [babel-devel] [cffi-devel] Unit tests failures on different
	lisps
In-Reply-To: <854611325129024@web51.yandex.ru>
References: <760261325107519@web141.yandex.ru>
	<CAB-HnLSi9ZCP_jLywuJuV2e=ZRMQadSHqjMDD6MTsdHnr7wf-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<854611325129024@web51.yandex.ru>
Message-ID: <CAB-HnLSzsir3Dcxcviv-uF=AwKZYbJwS4DbcRyy=Jv0CTSQ1xw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov at yandex.ru> wrote:
> Not yet, because I am in the beginning of the project and only
> starting to see the first results (it's not really a buildfarm, but
> a small system where anyone may run a simple command, like
> (load "agent.lisp"), and it runs the tests and submits the results
> to the central server; so that we will be able to accumulate
> the statictics; currently this command just runs tests on
> whatever is the current quicklisp distribution is installed
> on the system, and I am the only person who runs this command
> - I am testing how it works and polishing the corner cases).

OK, cool stuff. Have you considered using something like Jenkins?

-- 
Lu?s Oliveira
http://r42.eu/~luis/