From fahree at gmail.com  Fri Oct  9 18:46:38 2009
From: fahree at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Far=E9?=)
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 14:46:38 -0400
Subject: [babel-devel] XCVB patch for Babel
Message-ID: <653bea160910091146t90672ebob52b7faed1d9ce0d@mail.gmail.com>

Here is the patch I use to build Babel with XCVB (assuming alexandria
and trivial-features are similarly patched).

Is it OK to include this patch upstream?

[ Fran?ois-Ren? ?VB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
[...] there is what I call  the "roundtrip fallacy": it is a mistake to use,
as journalists and some economists do, statistics without logic but the reverse
does not hold:  It is not a mistake to use logic without statistics.
        -- N. C. Taleb, Fooled by Randomness, 2004.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: b.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 7546 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/babel-devel/attachments/20091009/e94f0332/attachment.diff>

From tcr at freebits.de  Sat Oct 10 06:50:20 2009
From: tcr at freebits.de (Tobias C. Rittweiler)
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:50:20 +0200
Subject: [babel-devel] XCVB patch for Babel
References: <653bea160910091146t90672ebob52b7faed1d9ce0d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <87fx9rg2tv.fsf@freebits.de>

Far? <fahree at gmail.com> writes:

> Here is the patch I use to build Babel with XCVB (assuming alexandria
> and trivial-features are similarly patched).
>
> Is it OK to include this patch upstream?
>
> [ Fran?ois-Ren? ?VB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
> [...] there is what I call  the "roundtrip fallacy": it is a mistake to use,
> as journalists and some economists do, statistics without logic but the reverse
> does not hold:  It is not a mistake to use logic without statistics.
>         -- N. C. Taleb, Fooled by Randomness, 2004.
> Index: src/enc-unicode.lisp
> ===================================================================
> --- src/enc-unicode.lisp	(revision 315654)
> +++ src/enc-unicode.lisp	(working copy)
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>  ;;; This implementation is largely based on OpenMCL's l1-unicode.lisp
>  ;;;   Copyright (C) 2006 Clozure Associates and contributors.
>  
> +#+xcvb (module (:depends-on ("src/packages" "src/encodings")))
> +
> ....

I don't see that the patch touched any defpackage form, so: what's the
home-package of MODULE? Isn't it XCVB?

  -T.




From fahree at gmail.com  Fri Oct 23 01:26:44 2009
From: fahree at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Far=E9?=)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:26:44 -0400
Subject: [babel-devel] XCVB patch for Babel
In-Reply-To: <653bea160910091146t90672ebob52b7faed1d9ce0d@mail.gmail.com>
References: <653bea160910091146t90672ebob52b7faed1d9ce0d@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <653bea160910221826y1eec7905k67259a362df2e8c9@mail.gmail.com>

> Here is the patch I use to build Babel with XCVB (assuming alexandria
> and trivial-features are similarly patched).
>
> Is it OK to include this patch upstream?

Updated patch attached.

[ Fran?ois-Ren? ?VB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Is there absolutely no absolute? Isn't relativity relative?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: babel.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 7781 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/babel-devel/attachments/20091022/23174a1b/attachment.diff>