[babel-devel] Changes

[Dan Weinreb]

Luís Oliveira wrote:
>
>
> I see. For our purposes, though, it seems that if CODE-CHAR returns
> NIL, we should signal a test failure immediately.
>   
I don't understand why.  If code-char is allowed to return nil,
explicitly, in the CL standard, why consider that to be
a babel test failure?

Shouldn't it be possible to run the regression test under
CCL and have it succeed if babel does not have bugs?

-- Dan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/babel-devel/attachments/20090410/fd692d9f/attachment.html>