[asdf-install-devel] Re: [cclan-list] ASDF-Install patch to allow installation of unsigned packages

Gary King gwking at metabang.com
Thu May 24 22:29:50 UTC 2007


> It seems to me that these are choices made by the person installing  
> a package, whereas making a package without a signature is a choice  
> made by the person providing the package.

Tim, this is a reasonable distinction.

> I'm okay with opting out of the signature verification on my end if  
> it's expedient, but I'm not really down with a potential  
> proliferation of unsigned packages.  In my world, an unsigned  
> package should not be called ASDF-INSTALLable.

Could it be ASDF-Installable but just not be called that (kidding!).
--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413) 885 9127
Fax: (206) 338-4052
gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM







More information about the asdf-install-devel mailing list