[asdf-install-devel] Re: [cclan-list] ASDF-Install patch to allow installation of unsigned packages
Gary King
gwking at metabang.com
Thu May 24 22:29:50 UTC 2007
> It seems to me that these are choices made by the person installing
> a package, whereas making a package without a signature is a choice
> made by the person providing the package.
Tim, this is a reasonable distinction.
> I'm okay with opting out of the signature verification on my end if
> it's expedient, but I'm not really down with a potential
> proliferation of unsigned packages. In my world, an unsigned
> package should not be called ASDF-INSTALLable.
Could it be ASDF-Installable but just not be called that (kidding!).
--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413) 885 9127
Fax: (206) 338-4052
gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM
More information about the asdf-install-devel
mailing list