<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Nah, a tag is supposed to never change. The mechanism for a "tag that<br>
changes" is called... a branch.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>the user story that i desire is a label that someone with the commit bit can move around freely, and then it gets automatically synchronized to everyone else who pulls/fetches the repo (i.e. *without* reading multiple blog posts and issuing multiple git commands).</div><div><br></div><div>a release branch, especially with force-pushed commits, is rather far from that in terms of the user experience. but then maybe i should learn to love merge commits...<br></div><div><br></div><div>now, how exactly git behaves is another story. it never seizes to surprise me.</div><div><br></div><div>(i'm fine with calling the "stable" label as "release", or whatever else. the actual name wasn't my point.)</div><div><br></div><div>- attila</div></div></div>