<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">On Aug 26, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Robert P. Goldman <<a href="mailto:rpgoldman@sift.info">rpgoldman@sift.info</a>> wrote:<br><div><blockquote type="cite">Ben Hyde wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">Would changing (:tree <path>) so it accepts an optional argument be less<br>adhoc?<br><br>Possibly (:tree <path> &key (depth nil)<br>(don-not-recure-after-asdf-encountered nil))<br><br>That said this would have little if any value in my use case. I point<br>ask it to sweep over my<br>the directory where all my coding lives, and most of the directories in<br>there are not lisp, and so<br>there ain’t any asd files in those.<br></blockquote><br>I think the problem with this is that, as Fare points out, it's the<br>author of the system who has laid out the directory tree</blockquote><br></div><div>your both quite wise, i agree</div></body></html>