ASDF upgrade script fails on cmucl/Linux
rpgoldman at sift.info
Thu Feb 14 22:15:37 UTC 2019
On 14 Feb 2019, at 4:55, Anton Vodonosov wrote:
> 13.02.2019, 01:44, "Robert Goldman" <rpgoldman at sift.info>:
>> On a happier note, both (Home)brew and Ubuntu have newish versions of
>> clisp which, AFAICT, pass all the ASDF tests. Yay!
> What newish clisp it is? I have been hoping clips will release somem
> "refreshment" release, maybe just the same code as the previous
> release but new ASDF. From time to time are check the mailing list
> and project page - no news.
> Is that OS package maintainers did anything on the package level?
I think it's the packaging managers, not the clisp maintainers who did
On my Mac, with Homebrew, the version is:
/usr/local/Cellar/clisp/2.49_2 (64 files, 16.2MB)
According to GitHub, it was last updated 20 days ago. I don't really
know how up-to-date it is with the clisp repo versus the ancient zip
On my Ubuntu Box, I have a package whose version is listed as
`1:2.49.20170913-4build1`. I don't know how to tell what that
corresponds to in terms of the clisp source repo.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the asdf-devel