Testing for ASDF 3.3.2 and beyond?

[Robert Goldman]

Thank you very much, Anton.  Question: is the inner-conditional-test 
failure on SBCL 1.3.21 not a regression?  I just loaded this system and 
tested it on my mac with SBCL 1.4.3, and it worked fine, so I'm inclined 
to treat this is not a problem.  Also, the inner conditional system has 
a readme saying it's not maintained and please not to use it.

What about reversi on CCL 1.9?  I guess if I understand correctly, 
reversi must have passed on CCL 1.10 and 1.11, so probably I shouldn't 
worry about this, either.

Fare, what do you think?  Should I release this version, or wait a 
little longer and see if we can get the syntax fix in, as well?

Maybe I should release this as 3.3.2, and make the syntax-fixed version 
of ASDF be 3.4, since (for some people) it might be a bigger change.

Best,
r



On 17 Mar 2018, at 7:51, Anton Vodonosov wrote:

> Results for these lisps:
>
> abcl-1.5.0-fasl43-linux-x86
> ccl-1.10-r16196-f96-linux-x86
> ccl-1.11-r16635-f96-linux-x86
> ccl-1.9-r15756-f96-linux-x86
> clisp-2.49-unix-x86
> ecl-16.1.2-unknown-linux-x86-bytecode
> ecl-16.1.2-unknown-linux-x86-lisp-to-c
> sbcl-1.1.16-linux-x86
> sbcl-1.3.21-linux-x86
>
> show no regressions.
>
> ACL tests are running - needed to re-run them because licence refresh 
> was needed.
>
> The report: 
> https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/asdf/asdf-diff-73.html
>
> Best regards,
> - Anton
>
> 13.03.2018, 16:53, "Anton Vodonosov" <avodonosov at yandex.ru>:
>> I've started tests for 3.3.1.7
>>
>> 11.03.2018, 06:11, "Faré" <fahree at gmail.com>:
>>>  Dear Anton,
>>>
>>>  can you try your test suite again against 3.3.1.7 ? I think we're
>>>  mostly ready to release 3.3.2 this time, with its many bugs fixes 
>>> (and
>>>  bug fix fixes).
>>>
>>>  Can you also try the branch made by Robert for syntax-control + a 
>>> copy
>>>  of the standard readtable as default?
>>>
>>>  —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau 
>>> •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
>>>  Wir Mathematiker sind alle ein bisschen meschugge.
>>>  (We mathematicans are all a bit crazy). — Lev Landau